S StorablePrawn Banned Oct 7, 2005 #51 AndoCalrissian said: Great, now I need to decide whether I want the PC special edition for the future, as I don't have a DVD drive yet. Click to expand... So you're the reason publishers still ship PC games on 19 CD-ROMs.
AndoCalrissian said: Great, now I need to decide whether I want the PC special edition for the future, as I don't have a DVD drive yet. Click to expand... So you're the reason publishers still ship PC games on 19 CD-ROMs.
F flipswitch Member Oct 7, 2005 #52 ManaByte said: PS2 Quake 3 blew away the DC one, even without online play. It ran at a silky 60fps. Bullfrog, bitches! Click to expand... Indeed it did but when you had more players the texture resolution decreases.I dont think that was a problem for the DC.
ManaByte said: PS2 Quake 3 blew away the DC one, even without online play. It ran at a silky 60fps. Bullfrog, bitches! Click to expand... Indeed it did but when you had more players the texture resolution decreases.I dont think that was a problem for the DC.
T Tain Member Oct 7, 2005 #53 True, but framerate's a big enough issue for low-res textures to not be a problem. Christ, some people still play Q3 on absolute minimal detail to get the highest framerate possible. So you're the reason publishers still ship PC games on 19 CD-ROMs. Click to expand... Seriously. A good DVD burner is, like, $45.
True, but framerate's a big enough issue for low-res textures to not be a problem. Christ, some people still play Q3 on absolute minimal detail to get the highest framerate possible. So you're the reason publishers still ship PC games on 19 CD-ROMs. Click to expand... Seriously. A good DVD burner is, like, $45.