• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Quantum Break rated for PC in Brazil

Somebody else suggested that. As far as I'm concerned a Microsoft published game won't ever appear on Playstation/Nintendo platforms outside of Minecraft. The Android/iOS markets are too large to ignore as far as their productivity and office suites are concerned, Microsoft lives for products like Office so they need to look at where the users are. Sony and Nintendo are small fish as far as revenue is concerned, they're not anything worth going after. Hell, gaming in general is.

Oh shit, yea... I got mixed up with who I was responding to.

In that case, McHuj... same question. :P
 
I don't think that this is the case. RotTR isn't MS's game, the IP isn't theirs and the publisher is not them. It was never their decision on how to publish RotTR on PC.

Gears and QB on the other hand are Microsoft's games and as such they will most likely be WinStore "exclusive" without any dependency on how RotTR will sell in WinStore. I'm not expecting them to release their IPs anywhere but in WinStore. Well, I'm not expecting them to release QB on PC at all but I still hope.

I'm saying that if the split with RotTR shows that there is a preference for the Steam version above the WinStore version, then it strikes me as likely that MS will release its paid games on Steam in addition to the WinStore as that's evidently where the mindshare is. Gears UE PC still lacking any sort of release date beyond a vague "Spring 2016" gives MS a few months of sales data to sift through.

You and I have a history of back-and-forths that you suddenly bailed out of, I presume because you don't permit yourself to admit when someone else has even a vaguely valid point (which is not to be misconstrued as a personal insult -- if I believed talking to you to be a hopelessly lost cause, I wouldn't have made this post), so let's just agree that time will tell. I could very well be wrong.
 
I suppose this is good news for those interested, but I'd rather have had Rare Replay (out of the question, I know) or Sunset Overdrive. :(
 
Well it would of course be tied to your xb gamertag on pc, so it really only affects the people who buy it for xb1 first and then for pc again or vice versa, which is not that many I reckon for a purely single player game. I bet it's well below 1% of people (number from my ass) and it could generate some good will.

Heh, you are more optimistic than me!

I'm too much of the belief that moneys gotta be made first for the vast majority of large game companies, but would be an awesome gesture to have a cross buy deal in.
 
Well it would of course be tied to your xb gamertag on pc, so it really only affects the people who buy it for xb1 first and then for pc again or vice versa, which is not that many I reckon for a purely single player game. I bet it's well below 1% of people (number from my ass) and it could generate some good will.

Your Windows Store account can be different from the XBL account you use to play. So there's actually a lot more scope for cross-buy to be exploited than you may think.
 
MS may feel that getting people to use their W10 environment is more valuable than selling a few xboxes. Not that i think this will impact sales (much)

The Xbox as a piece of hardware isn't going to be as important in the future. Are you buying those games on your Windows 10 PC from the Xbox/Windows store (or whatever they call it)? Good, you're the customer Microsoft wants. They will want you as much as they want consumers buying stuff from the XBO.

It's not going to happen overnight, but with (potential) announcements like this and Recore every so often, it's eventually going to be the future of the Xbox brand. Xbox hardware is not valuable to Microsoft anymore.

I agree with your general point... after all, I'm primarily an Xbox user, but would opt for the Windows 10 version of pretty much everything they release (Fable Legends, Killer Instinct, etc). If it got to the point that I could play everything that would otherwise be exclusive to XB1 on PC, then I'd likely just transition away from using the Xbox in general, which basically means that they'd simply lose my annual Live fees, whilst not actually seeing any additional sales from me.

However... I don't agree that it can only harm the Xbox One either. As the PS4 continues to extend its lead, it becomes easier for third-parties to see that platform as sufficient enough to skip releasing certain software on Xbox, or at least strike favorable deals with Sony for them. If MS is able to make the Win10 store an attractive option as a result of gamers that don't own an Xbox being drawn to it in order to access Xbox games, then because it would likely be considered the same general ecosystem and userbase, it could lead to software being released to it (and subsequently XB1) that would otherwise have not been released. This would however be practically impossible without MS first making the effort to get eyes on their store by releasing compelling software of their own. They've just got to be careful to cut the legs out from under the XB1 without managing to securing a recurring base of visitors to the Windows Store. If everyone simply downloads a copy of Gears, and then returns to Steam then the tradeoff wouldn't be at all worth it... which is why I think the early focus on F2P content that encourage repeated store engagement makes sense.

Xbox hardware (outside of accessories) has never been valuable to MS... but the Live subscriptions (and licensing fees) are, and currently only users of Xbox hardware have been willing to provide that.

Yeah, I also think these may be the first steps towards replacing or turning XOne with/into a kind of Win10 machine.
But still, even if that ends up being a masterplay and getting MS tons of money, it will have come at the expense of the XOne. I´m not saying it´s a bad move for MS as an enterprise, I´m saying that it´s a bad move for the XOne. Today, the XOne has one reason less to convince me to get one and if this trend continues it will have none at all. If Demon´s Souls, Bloodborne and Last of Us got ported to PC I would have no interest in getting someday a PS4.


But you have to realize that not every gamer wants to game on a PC or has a PC that's capable of playing these games.

Like you can buy madden, Fifa and COd and play it on PC yet tons of people don't. QB being on PC isn't gonna hurt Xbox sales much at all. It'll inly bemused in forum list wars
Of course there are cases where people can´t play them on PC, but some other people will opt out of a XOne for a PC. There are two scenarios:
1-XOne exclusives only in XOne = 100% of people who want to play those games have to buy a XOne.
2-XOne "exclusives" also in Win10 = X% people will decide to upgrade their PC, Y% will buy a XOne and Z% will just get the games for their already capable PC.

As long as X+Z > 0% XOne will have less sales in scenario 2 than in scenario 1.
 
Ok, so to get back to the "third-party" stuff... how does this work in regards to releasing isolated game within other companies closed ecosystems? Release a game on PS5, and you don't strengthen the MS ecosystem, you strengthen Sony's (who will be looking to expand into the PC space with stuff like PS Now as well). They can't provide an Xbox Live on PlayStation... same with Nintendo. Pretty much anything that's not a f2p that they can monetize as a service becomes it's own isolated entity. Shit, EA can't even get their small little EA Access ecosystem off the ground as a result of Sony veto'ing.

I don't think it's a question of strengthening the other platform, just increasing their own revenue and profit by reaching the widest possible audience. You don't have to win by making the other guy lose.
 
Currently this is more or less the only exclusive for which I would buy an Xbox One. If it really comes to PC I would really embrace it! Until then I fire up Rise of the Tomb Raider on my PC :>
 
Good, because I love remedy games in general. However I'm still not buying until Microsoft can demonstrate a competent service over several years
 
I don't think it's a question of strengthening the other platform, just increasing their own revenue and profit by reaching the widest possible audience. You don't have to win by making the other guy lose.

Yea, but what you're describing isn't an ecosystem play.. .and in this case the other guy has reasons to make you lose in order to win (again, see EA Access). When you cut out the money they see from their own ecosystem (made from other people's games more than their own) the tradeoff doesn't look very favourable at all. So Halo goes from selling 5mil to selling 10mil again... that's nice and all... but small fry compared to taking a cut of every Xbox game ever sold. Hell, even without the cut obtained from other publishers EA has seen fit to try and remove themselves from their competitors ecosystems, despite the reduced audience that would imply. Creating games as a third-party publisher isn't the way for MS to maximize revenue... having a widely present Xbox ecosystem is.
 
Good, because I love remedy games in general. However I'm still not buying until Microsoft can demonstrate a competent service over several years

So what, you are going to wait a few years to play a game you want to play? I wish I had your patience.
 
I think it's coming as well to PC, but they do not have a good record (Brazilian here) they also rated Gears of War 3, Halo 4 and Halo ODST, Forza Horizon 2 for PC a long time ago, example:

9NbviUd.jpg


I would take this as a grain of salt
 
Not officially confirmed, plus there are console exclusive games rated for PC on the Brazilian board.

It's probably a mistake on their part.

Lol just checked the actual site, just some games which were rated for pc in addition to xbox by them I could find within 20 secs:

halo 3, halo 4, halo reach, gears of war 3, gears of war judgement, forza 4

So this rating says absolutely nothing unfortunately...

giphy.gif



Edit: Damn, beaten....
 
I'm not going to buy the game on day one so I'll wait and see what happens. Would definitely prefer to play it on PC (mostly because I'm more invested in that ecosystem).
 
So what, you are going to wait a few years to play a game you want to play? I wish I had your patience.

I guess you don't get the mindset of a lot of PC gamers then :/

Also, when you have a catalog that runs into the 100s, as well as a plethora of timesink online games, it becomes a lot easier to wait for things...
 
So what, you are going to wait a few years to play a game you want to play? I wish I had your patience.

Pretty much. I've been burned on Microsoft services before and after GFWL, I'm not putting my money there until I'm thoroughly convinced that the service won't completely fuck itself. That will take several years. I avoid Uplay games for similar reasons and have been avoiding Origin, although that is no longer due to the service as that seems to have improved over the years, just eggergious pricing, dlc and broken games for years at a time remain the issue.

I am happy to see more competition, but Microsoft have a lot to prove to me first.
 
I don't mind this being exclusive to Windows 10 store. I love Steam, but I'm not afraid to use other stores such as Origin and Uplay. Cross buy would be awesome too. I'm just glad it coming to PC.
 
Great news if true. I sold my xbox one to get a PC and this and Scalebound are the only games that made me hesitate (played and loved SO)
 
I think it's coming as well to PC, but they do not have a good record (Brazilian here) they also rated Gears of War 3, Halo 4 and Halo ODST, Forza Horizon 2 for PC a long time ago, example:

9NbviUd.jpg


I would take this as a grain of salt

Forza Horizon 2 wasn't rated for PC, only FH 1.

Recently they have a solid record. There are no PC ratings for Halo 5, The Master Chief Collection, Sunset Overdrive, Forza Horizon 2 or Rare Replay.
 
Awesome, it's the one game X1 had that I wanted and now I can get it.
 
I'm saying that if the split with RotTR shows that there is a preference for the Steam version above the WinStore version, then it strikes me as likely that MS will release its paid games on Steam in addition to the WinStore as that's evidently where the mindshare is. Gears UE PC still lacking any sort of release date beyond a vague "Spring 2016" gives MS a few months of sales data to sift through.
They don't need any test case to know that a title launching right now will sell better in Steam than in WinStore, that's just common sense. It is also common sense for them to lock down their IPs beyond WinStore exclusivity to promote and test the platform this way - I mean I don't expect Valve to release DOTA2 in WinStore no matter how many copies it would sell there, why would MS do anything differently here?

You and I have a history of back-and-forths that you suddenly bailed out of, I presume because you don't permit yourself to admit when someone else has even a vaguely valid point (which is not to be misconstrued as a personal insult -- if I believed talking to you to be a hopelessly lost cause, I wouldn't have made this post), so let's just agree that time will tell. I could very well be wrong.

I have no issues admitting that I'm wrong - when I'm clearly wrong. With you it's mostly a difference of opinions from which I tend to bail out at some point when there's nothing more to explain to each other -)
 
Pretty much. I've been burned on Microsoft services before and after GFWL, I'm not putting my money there until I'm thoroughly convinced that the service won't completely fuck itself. That will take several years. I avoid Uplay games for similar reasons and have been avoiding Origin, although that is no longer due to the service as that seems to have improved over the years, just eggergious pricing, dlc and broken games for years at a time remain the issue.

I am happy to see more competition, but Microsoft have a lot to prove to me first.

Gotcha. Make sense.
 
Forza Horizon 2 wasn't rated for PC, only FH 1.

Recently they have a solid record. There are no PC ratings for Halo 5, The Master Chief Collection, Sunset Overdrive, Forza Horizon 2 or Rare Replay.

Still this is hardly evidence, they have been wrong so many times, just because they got 4 games right doesn't instill a whole lot of confidence in them.
 
Yea, but what you're describing isn't an ecosystem play.. .and in this case the other guy has reasons to make you lose in order to win (again, see EA Access). When you cut out the money they see from their own ecosystem (made from other people's games more than their own) the tradeoff doesn't look very favourable at all. So Halo goes from selling 5mil to selling 10mil again... that's nice and all... but small fry compared to taking a cut of every Xbox game ever sold. Hell, even without the cut obtained from other publishers EA has seen fit to try and remove themselves from their competitors ecosystems, despite the reduced audience that would imply. Creating games as a third-party publisher isn't the way for MS to maximize revenue... having a widely present Xbox ecosystem is.

The thing is I don't think MS has an ecosystem play. They'll probably try, but I don't think it will be successful, especially, on an open platform like PC. I think it will be limited to first party games only. I don't think any third party would put their software on the MS store when Steam is such an established platform or other publishers have their own (Origin, Uplay)
 
This would be awesome if true. Hopefully it starts the cross-buy stuff. I'm still keeping my XBO (I need to upgrade my PC though) as it provides more than just games to me (I love using Kinect for my TV...I hope they have an option for it in the next Xbox). Maybe it's something that MS announces at the February event.

For those saying the next Xbox is basically a win10 machine...well that's what the Xbox One is now (it was previously an Win8 machine). I just want the cross-buy for MS IPs to start happening with PC. I see a lot of posts about devaluation of Xbox One and all that jazz but who cares? MS has to figure it out. The biggest thing to any business is having and getting customers. Even if you have to give stuff away or even if you gotta take some sort of loss, you got to get and keep customers. If cross-buy and day and date of XBO/PC release for MS IP is some good will ish, then so be it. MS needs to be customer driven, PC customers want some of the MS IP. Well, they'll give it to you and to the xbox one customer because those are their platforms. People who are in their "garden" should be rewarded for being there (in my opinion).

Personally, I want cross-buy because I want to be able to go use the PC if I'm not on the couch playing games and my lady wants to use the main TV. I don't want to have two gaming PCs and most of the time I don't want to sit a desk to play games. I did the same when I didn't have my lady. Xbox One was in a different room than my PC. Some reasons of releasing games on both platforms go beyond devaluation.
 
Makes sense microsoft is finally realizing that windows is also their platform for games and can make a lot more money by selling their games on PC too. This fits Nadella's vision for the overall company.
 
I can see the next Xbox being a PC/Console hybrid with the W10 wrote being the unifies storefront.

It's great that more people get the chance to play the game. Personally I'll stick with my Xbox as it sits under my TV where I want it.

People who keep howling this mantra that Xbox is losing it exclusivity don't seem to be seeing the bigger picture.
 
giphy.gif


This is the one xbone exclusive I really feel like I can't go without. I can't see them announcing a PC version prior to the xbone launch, but later in the year once the initial hype has died down makes sense. Can't wait.
 
I can see the next Xbox being a PC/Console hybrid with the W10 wrote being the unifies storefront.

It's great that more people get the chance to play the game. Personally I'll stick with my Xbox as it sits under my TV where I want it.

People who keep howling this mantra that Xbox is losing it exclusivity don't seem to be seeing the bigger picture.

You my friend...I like you.
 
The thing is I don't think MS has an ecosystem play. They'll probably try, but I don't think it will be successful, especially, on an open platform like PC. I think it will be limited to first party games only. I don't think any third party would put their software on the MS store when Steam is such an established platform or other publishers have their own (Origin, Uplay)

Well, if they're Windows platform and the Xbox platform become one and the same, then I think plenty of publishers would. That's kinda the whole point of having a unified platform rather than simply creating a Windows gaming platform to challenge Steam directly.

But sure, it's possible that they'll fail at this, and that the Xbox platform itself also fails to be sustainable in the form that it is. But if such a drastic situation were to occur, then I would expect MS to focus on things that actually do strengthen their ecosystem (their primary focus in all areas), rather than bother to operate as a publisher. They have little incentive or desire to act in that fashion. Look at Xbox Video for example... hardly the most successful video service on the planet, but what got dropped first, their attempt at an ecosystem play, or their attempts to compete, creating original video content? One of these will consistently be deemed not worth their time when push comes to shove, and it'll never be the ecosystem option.
 
They don't need any test case to know that a title launching right now will sell better in Steam than in WinStore, that's just common sense. It is also common sense for them to lock down their IPs beyond WinStore exclusivity to promote and test the platform this way - I mean I don't expect Valve to release DOTA2 in WinStore no matter how many copies it would sell there, why would MS do anything differently here?

Of course there's no debate as to which service will sell more copies, especially when you take into account GeForce bundles. But Microsoft no doubt has expectations and if those expectations are not met, then it's not outlandish to believe there's a strong possibility that MS will release its own paid games on Steam in addition to the WinStore. An attempt to position the WinStore as "The place to get Microsoft games" won't work if people aren't using it.
 
Top Bottom