• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Question About Firefly

Status
Not open for further replies.

pnjtony

Member
For those of you that watched the show. Does Serenity start where the show leaves off or is it before the show or middle? How is the timeline between the movie and the show?
 
Takes place a month or two after the conclusion of the series; the only story in the interim is in the recent comic miniseries (which just ties up a few loose ends from the series not addressed in the movie).
 
just a few months (8??) after the show leaves off.

didn't Mal mention something about 8 months in the movie?
 
wow, that must be dissapointing for original fans. I wonder if it'll be hard for me to watch the show now with that knowledge.
 
Iceman said:
just a few months (8??) after the show leaves off.

didn't Mal mention something about 8 months in the movie?

yes. but I think that was in reference to the total time they have been on board. So 8 months total.

Say 5 or 6 for the actual show, and then a month to pass for the comic stories (which I need to find!!!), and then the movie? That sound about right?

pnjtony said:
wow, that must be dissapointing for original fans. I wonder if it'll be hard for me to watch the show now with that knowledge.

Actually.. there was hints. She did some crazy stuff in the series, but nothing quite like the film. It made sense and was a logical, (if slightly predictable), angle to go with.
 
pnjtony said:
wow, that must be dissapointing for original fans. I wonder if it'll be hard for me to watch the show now with that knowledge.

How so?

The browncoat fans are so psychoticly defensive about Firefly/Serenity, there could be a scene in the movie where the Fonz is waterskiing in space and jumps over the ship and they'll still say it's the greatest fucking thing ever.
 
pnjtony said:
wow, that must be dissapointing for original fans. I wonder if it'll be hard for me to watch the show now with that knowledge.

I found River Tam, in general, to be the least interesting character in the series, to the point where I was disappointed when I figured out that the film was going to focus on her (though I guess that River's storyline was the plot point that most urgently needed to be wrapped up).

Which is to say that there are a number of other things that make the show worth watching besides River's plotline--I'd go so far as to say that River's plotline is not one of the things that makes the show worth watching.

EDIT: so you know where I'm coming from opinion-wise, I think there are several episodes of the TV series that have better writing and directing than the film, and that the film's overrated.
 
Red Mercury: that could work.

In the show they imply and forshadow much River involved ass-kicking. Plus they also show her
shooting dead 3 armed soldiers without even looking
.. so not only were we prepared for that we were expecting it.
 
No, the 5th Element super chick weapon angle was just for the movie.

I don't remember her kicking the shit out of anyone but she definitely knew how to shoot a gun on the show (without even looking where she was shooting). It didn't seem out of place in the movie.
 
There was less than a minute between our replies (so I didn't know) and everyone knows from the movie trailer that she's some sort of super weapon.

edit: Plus Manabyte is spreading misinformation and it deserves to be countered without spoiler tags.
 
ManaByte said:
The browncoat fans are so psychoticly defensive about Firefly/Serenity, there could be a scene in the movie where the Fonz is waterskiing in space and jumps over the ship and they'll still say it's the greatest fucking thing ever.
Wow, defensive much? I think most Firefly fans are fans of Sci-fi in general, if not a good story first, and after having years and years of garbage shoved down out throat we were pretty damn happy to have a good movie we could point too again. Sorry if your sci-fi series of choice just happened to be the dreck we were all getting force fed.

While the movie is fantastic, it isn't perfect, and I doubt any fan of the series would say otherwise in an honest debate. So lay off.

Prospero said:
I found River Tam, in general, to be the least interesting character in the series, to the point where I was disappointed when I figured out that the film was going to focus on her (though I guess that River's storyline was the plot point that most urgently needed to be wrapped up).
Agreed, 100%. Not a bad character, but really they most predictable one in the bunch. It was the kind of main underlying arc of the series, and thus needed to be wrapped up first, but I think there is much more interesting subject material to work with within the Firefly/Serenity universe. Hopefully we'll get to see some of that fleshed out in future projects.
 
Well, my copy of the Firefly series is on it's way and I was just wondering how everything fit together. Some things I noticed about the movie though.

It felt like that opening scene with Simon, the getaway and then the bad guy was written and directed by someone else alltogether separate from the rest of the movie. Did anyone else notice that? It was like all slick and shit, then it went to making wisecracks about grenades. Don't get me wrong, I totally loved the laid back and humor in the movie, it just felt wierd. Plus the budding little romance with Simon and that loading dock chick was wierd. Like they mentioned it in the beginning and you didn't see anything else til the end. All of a sudden they're having sex.
 
ManaByte said:
No, the 5th Element super chick weapon angle was just for the movie.
didn't she shoot 3 guys in the head with pin point accuracy while her eyes were closed?
 
Red Mercury said:
Wow, defensive much? I think most Firefly fans are fans of Sci-fi in general, if not a good story first, and after having years and years of garbage shoved down out throat we were pretty damn happy to have a good movie we could point too again. Sorry if your sci-fi series of choice just happened to be the dreck we were all getting force fed.

While the movie is fantastic, it isn't perfect, and I doubt any fan of the series would say otherwise in an honest debate. So lay off.

While there are a few that are as you described, the majority are die-hard Whedon worshippers who see everything he touches as completely perfect - including Serenity and they go so far as to attack things completely unrelated.

At Comic Con, DC was going to file a complaint against Universal after Universal supplied Browncoats with Serenity stickers and the Browncoats went and plastered the stickers all over the Batman Begins and Superman Returns posters in the DC booth. They DID complain to Comic Con at the gripe panel about the vandalism.

As far as SciFi fans go, the majority of Browncoats are on the Greenpeace/PETA fringe of things.
 
Red Mercury said:
[...]I think there is much more interesting subject material to work with within the Firefly/Serenity universe. Hopefully we'll get to see some of that fleshed out in future projects.

I agree, but I'll be surprised if we see any more Firefly-based films.

Box Office Mojo said:
Serenity rustled up $5.4 million in its second weekend for a 10-day tally of $18 million. The $39 million space western's 47 percent drop was precipitous but solid for the genre—such similar pictures as The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow and The Chronicles of Riddick each had greater falls. However, they were generating much more business, and, at its current pace, Serenity is aiming for a final haul of around $28 million.

Theaters get around 50% of the gross (a little more or less, depending on the deal the chain cuts with the studio). So at around $14 million going back to the studio, the film is still around $25 million in the hole, not counting what was spent on advertising. It will take a long time for Serenity to make that back on DVD, cable, and network TV, if it ever makes it back.

I'm kind of surprised at how poorly the film's doing--though I wouldn't rank it anywhere near the best films I've seen this year, it's certainly better than Hitchhiker's or Sky Captain (though I had a soft spot for Riddick, and given the choice between watching Serenity or Riddick again, I'd probably take Riddick). Serenity's terrible initial trailer could have been part of the problem.

On the whole, it seemed like Universal's advertising plan was to whip up the rabid fanbase and depend on them to evangelize; it may be the case that that backfired. To be fair to ManaByte, a number of Firefly fanboys (especially online) really are crazy as hell and devoid of any critical judgment, and their behavior may have done the film a disservice in the end.

The end result is that I'll probably never get to see a movie in which the Serenity crew engages in a ridiculously elaborate and cunning operation to steal some insanely valuable McGuffin, only to have a monkeywrench thrown in their plans by
Saffron
. If that could have somehow been the film we got instead of the one we did, it might be performing much better.
 
Prospero said:
I agree, but I'll be surprised if we see any more Firefly-based films.

/snip/

The end result is that I'll probably never get to see a movie in which the Serenity crew engages in a ridiculously elaborate and cunning operation to steal some insanely valuable McGuffin, only to have a monkeywrench thrown in their plans by
Saffron
. If that could have somehow been the film we got instead of the one we did, it might be performing much better.

Man... I'd kill for that film. Maybe I am one of those crazy fan boys then. :D

Those episodes were always the best, and honestly.. it probably would have made a better film. Introduce River to the general public, hint again at her backstory. Don't
kill off any of the crew
so that when this trick is pulled in the second film it has more impact. Maybe resolving the River storyline wasn't the best route to go....

Seriously though, while I think the film will make its budget back, and while we might not see a second film, I do hope that the series will live on in some way. Ideally, I'd like to see one more flick, maybe two setting up a return to TV. Barring that.. well I don't know how it would return. Not enough interest obviously to bring it back as a series, unfortunately. I doubt the comic books have been tearing up the charts.
 
Prospero said:
I'm kind of surprised at how poorly the film's doing--though I wouldn't rank it anywhere near the best films I've seen this year, it's certainly better than Hitchhiker's or Sky Captain
I disagree (and I still can't believe that anybody likes the near-unwatchable mess that is Riddick), but it's undeniable that both films were far better marketed than Serenity. And Sky Captain had some actual star power.

Mana actually has a point, but given his relentless Lucas cocksucking... you know, glass houses and all.

(I may think Serenity is overrated, but I can agree that it shits all over the Star Wars prequels.)

Best (maybe) example of fans in denial: "I guess word-of-mouth doesn't mean much anymore!" As though it were unthinkable that Serenity might, you know, not be getting such great word of mouth. Shock.
 
Listen, Joss Whedon and his fans can go fuck a blender, but if you say one more disgustingly hypocritical thing ManaByte, I'm going to strap George Lucas to a rocket and launch it at your face while you're riding Space Mountain.
 
ManaByte said:
While there are a few that are as you described, the majority are die-hard Whedon worshippers who see everything he touches as completely perfect - including Serenity and they go so far as to attack things completely unrelated.

At Comic Con..

Comic Con.

this thread.

Comic Con.

this thread.

Do you see the difference, Manabyte?

I MAY SEEM DEFENSIVE TO YOU BUT I WAS ONLY ATTACKING THE PEOPLE WHO PUT STICKERS OVER BATMAN AT COMICCON SO IT MAKES PERFECT SENSE FOR WHAT I SAID BECAUSE THOSE PEOPLE ARE POSTING IN THIS THREAD EPCOT CENTER 4EVER

You are such a massive tool.
 
FoneBone said:
I disagree (and I still can't believe that anybody likes the near-unwatchable mess that is Riddick), but it's undeniable that [Hitchhiker's and Sky Captain] were far better marketed than Serenity. And Sky Captain had some actual star power.

I'll put it this way--I was bored through about two-thirds of Hitchhiker's, and I was bored during all but about ten minutes of Sky Captain (and I still have a grudge against Ebert for giving that a four-star review). For me those rank among the worst movies I've paid to see in a theater in the past five years. On the other hand, I was only bored through about the middle third of Serenity.

Riddick may have been an utter train wreck, but I'll say this for it--I was never bored. I acknowledge that it's a bad movie, but I'd be lying if I said I didn't like watching it, if only for Colm Feore and Judi Dench slumming it for a paycheck.
 
pnjtony said:
So in the show...River never kicks the shit out of people?

in the final 2 or 3 episodes she does some ass kicking, not physically though. shooting and outsmarting a guy real bad.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom