Doesn't this cover kind of make Cruz' point (in the eyes of his supporters)?
Every debate I pop in this thread looking for this. Never disappointed. Awesome
Doesn't this cover kind of make Cruz' point (in the eyes of his supporters)?
Made another debate summary / highlights video
2.5 hours condensed into 30 minutes:
https://youtu.be/oetvxpIOml0
There was substance. Trump said we should start a trade war with China. Cruz wants to eliminate our government's ability to collect taxes. Jeb knew where planes are built.Ok, so I watched this.
Is this how "political debates" work out in the US usually? I only saw low attacks on every part in every directs, but absolutely 0 substance.
(also seriously, what do you have against socialism? It's talked about as worse than Nazism from what I always hear/read....)
There was substance. Trump said we should start a trade war with China. Cruz wants to eliminate our government's ability to collect taxes. Jeb knew where planes are built.
It would look like a retreat.
"I uhhh uhh don't mean all new york values. just uh...the liberal ones that don't include 9/11. You know, those ones."
He can't own up to NY Values comment because of what Trump said and he can't try and clarify. If you have to clarify something after your attack has been heavily rebuffed, you look worse off in a debate.
It's like when you say "no no, I don't mean all black people. Hey, I even have black friends. I just mean.."
Why the hell didn't he have a response? I don't understand. Not only is "New York Values" standard shit, Trump made the 9/11 response before the debate. And Cruz still didn't have something to say? I bet even Jeb could have hit that one out of the park.What he did looked like a retreat. His criticism was about liberal policies, not how New Yorkers responded to 9/11. Clarifying that would have shut down Trump's attack and made it look like an opportunistic invocation of 9/11: "Don't criticize me because 9/11 so there!"
I don't think such a response would be anything like the black-friend defense. The latter doesn't clarify a statement.
Ok, so I watched this.
Is this how "political debates" work out in the US usually? I only saw low attacks on every part in every directs, but absolutely 0 substance.
(also seriously, what do you have against socialism? It's talked about as worse than Nazism from what I always hear/read....)
Why the hell didn't he have a response? I don't understand. Not only is "New York Values" standard shit, Trump made the 9/11 response before the debate. And Cruz still didn't have something to say? I bet even Jeb could have hit that one out of the park.
Christie is the biggest proverbial piece of shit on that stage. Easily. He is the biggest blowhard bully with the nastiest attacks against President Obama. Like how he will escort Obama out of the whitehouse on his last day etc. When the hurricane hit NJ, none of the states helped him so he goes crawling on his knees to beg Obama for federal dollars and Obama of course comes to the aid of people of New Jersey. Now this fat dipshit is acting all high and mighty talking like he's gonna kick Obama's ass or something. Beg Obama when you need his help and then chew him out infront of rabid frothing conservatives. Like I said, a giant piece of shit.
I agree. Its fucking annoying. He looks like he's there just to advertise himself and not care to engage with the questioners or give attention to the audience. The audience, despite being crazy thunderdome crowd, still deserves your respect because they are the ones who put the effort to be there. Dude just ignores them and treats the debates like a national primetime address and pounds Hillary and Obama. I mean, are we in the general or what. He is polling worse than fukking Ben "Joseph built pyramids to store grain" Carson. You got bigger problems buddy.Christie definitely needs to stop looking into the camera and look at moderators/crowd like the rest of them. You can't become President when you're flat out scaring people.
I dunnoChristie definitely needs to stop looking into the camera and look at moderators/crowd like the rest of them. You can't become President when you're flat out scaring people.
Christie definitely needs to stop looking into the camera and look at moderators/crowd like the rest of them. You can't become President when you're flat out scaring people.
Yeah his mugging is really dumb especially since it's all an act. His artifice shows any time he tries to be a tell-it-like-it-is, anti-Washington, anti-establishment outsider. He's so clearly just another politician trying to do what's popular.
He's that easily swayed, huh? Christie is the living personification of a non-factor.
I'm struggling to find how Christie is profiting from being in the race still. He has no chance and he knows it, he's just there for some ulterior motive that really has nothing to do with the race.
I'm struggling to find how Christie is profiting from being in the race still. He has no chance and he knows it, he's just there for some ulterior motive that really has nothing to do with the race.
I mean that was his "thing" prior to Trump coming in and stealing that spotlight of boorish-loud-person-with-no-filter, so I don't think he's "stealing" that act so much as he's trying to put the spotlight back on him by saying ridiculously stupider shit every time.
I'm struggling to find how Christie is profiting from being in the race still. He has no chance and he knows it, he's just there for some ulterior motive that really has nothing to do with the race.
What he did looked like a retreat. His criticism was about liberal policies, not how New Yorkers responded to 9/11. Clarifying that would have shut down Trump's attack and made it look like an opportunistic invocation of 9/11: "Don't criticize me because 9/11 so there!"
I don't think such a response would be anything like the black-friend defense. The latter doesn't clarify a statement.
It feels immature for a presidential candidate to insult New Yorkers or any segment of the population he or she is running to represent.. Cruz literally insults the people he wants to lead. Why pit our own nation against itself?
Having worked for the Republican Party for several years, the answer is this:It feels immature for a presidential candidate to insult New Yorkers or any segment of the population he or she is running to represent.. Cruz literally insults the people he wants to lead. Why pit our own nation against itself?
Christie completely shat the bed. The 2012 GOP nomination was his to take. Begged Obama for help during Sandy. He wanted to broker the image of a maverick who can cross party aisle for his inevitable 2016 crowning. Then Bridgegate happened and it submerged him nationwide. And then Trump happens shifting the party on the edge of a cliff. In other words, there is no comeback for him. NH might save his ass, but rest of the country is done with his shit.Four years ago people literally BEGGED him to get into the race. He declined, went on to hug Obama and shit on Romney and the party in general when they wouldn't offer him a prime speaking spot at the convention. He's remembering the part where everyone loved him and missing the fact that now everyone hates him almost as much as they hate Jindal.
He's just holding onto hope. The presidency is all he really has to shoot for. Otherwise, his political career is virtually toast in two years. It's this or nothing.I'm struggling to find how Christie is profiting from being in the race still. He has no chance and he knows it, he's just there for some ulterior motive that really has nothing to do with the race.
He's just holding onto hope. The presidency is all he really has to shoot for. Otherwise, his political career is virtually toast in two years. It's this or nothing.
he'll probably go back to being a lawyer, but private. that's my guess, anyway.
(also seriously, what do you have against socialism? It's talked about as worse than Nazism from what I always hear/read....)
Ahahahahaha dude should just say "I'm sorry, I was caught in the heat of the moment" or something.
Have you seen his "apology"?
http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/15/politics/ted-cruz-new-yorkers-apology/index.html
tldr: "Trump is masculine"
tldr: "Trump is masculine"
Scott Adam's Trump analysis has been pretty poor, I think.
Is that distinct from my summary? Sounds like some Conan the Barbarian shit.You conveniently left out the part about how Trump revealing how he could smell death after 9/11 reveals his motive to run for President.
Is that distinct from my summary? Sounds like some Conan the Barbarian shit.
Alright.Yes. A tldr should be the thesis of the article, not a summary of half of the intro.
Alright.
tldr: "Trump is running for president because he is masculine."