(Reuters) EU calls emergency meeting as crisis stalks Italy

Status
Not open for further replies.
fushi said:
Bu-but Estonia just got the Euro last year... do you mean we'll have to give it away again after the inevitable happens?

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_XJ5sUYJRQhA/StFqKB4-W7I/AAAAAAAAABc/TBgFaWn-aUA/s400/Sad+Smiley.png[IMG][/QUOTE]
We'll just go back to a bottle-cap based economy while they reprint the Kroons. It'll be ok.

[QUOTE=TacticalFox88]Jesus Christ, is there a European country NOT fucked up finacially?[/QUOTE]
Estonia represent! AKA the little America.
 
ThoseDeafMutes said:
It would be glorious, with a population and GDP higher than the United States. A true superpower. A political entity to fight for localization of niche Japanese games.
...and would collapse faster then you can say "Nationalism is a fucking bitch but thankfully in this case it prevents a clusterfuck of corruption and bullshit that is already overwhelming within the current European Union".

Besides, I sure as hell don't want to share political space with the Italians, Dutch, Czech and Hungarians. Lega Nord, Party for Freedom and Jobbik can all poop themselves :I
 
Bento said:
...and would collapse faster then you can say "Nationalism is a fucking bitch but thankfully in this case it prevents a clusterfuck of corruption and bullshit that is already overwhelming within the current European Union".

Besides, I sure as hell don't want to share political space with the Italians, Dutch, Czech and Hungarians. Lega Nord, Party for Freedom and Jobbik can all poop themselves :I

Your objections are as empty as your future. You are semi-autonomous because we allow it, and you will federate because we demand it. This conversation is over.
 
Purkake4 said:
Nah, just the economic and financial systems share some striking similarities. Well, except for the massive debt :P
And a lot of other things, really.
Rourkey said:
The thing that would amuse me if it wasn't so scary is that in Europe governments have managed to persuade the people it's all the banks fault and nothing to do with the fact they have spent years buying of the electorate and unions by borrowing money they wouldn't have to repay themselves.
Yeah, all those Greeks are surely rioting against the banks and not the government...

That is to say, I've no clue what you're basing this on. There is obviously a lot of vitriol against the banks -- for good reason, I might add -- but to say that there is no animosity against the governments of respective countries and their luxurious spending habits is wildly incorrect.
 
fushi said:
And a lot of other things, really.

Yeah, all those Greeks are surely rioting against the banks and not the government...

That is to say, I've no clue what you're basing this on. There is obviously a lot of vitriol against the banks -- for good reason, I might add -- but to say that there is no animosity against the governments of respective countries and their luxurious spending habits is wildly incorrect.


Almost every time I see an interview on the BBC with Greek rioters bankers and the "financial meltdown that we didn't cause" are getting the flack but then I suspect that might be editorial bias at the BBC who don't like to equate these sovereign debt problems to spend thrift governments being government funded themselves..
 
Phoenix said:
Hopefully this will help people understand why one world currency is untenable .
I'm not seeing how that is the case

If there was one world currency, the crash would not matter as much. Italy would simply become... Europe's New Jersey... or something. Do Americans feel like each state should have its own currency? I'm not necessarily in favour of one currency, but this is not really a solid argument against it.

Maybe I don't understand though, my grasp of economics as anything other than applied psychology is limited.
 
Dead Man said:
I'm not seeing how that is the case

If there was one world currency, the crash would not matter as much. Italy would simply become... Europe's New Jersey... or something. Do Americans feel like each state should have its own currency? I'm not necessarily in favour of one currency, but this is not really a solid argument against it.

Maybe I don't understand though, my grasp of economics as anything other than applied psychology is limited.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monetary_policy
 
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303812104576441650793563550.html

The Italian parliament is working on approving a €40 billion ($57.05 billion) austerity plan by Sunday, officials said, a fast timetable aimed at keeping Europe's debt crisis from infecting the continent's third-largest economy.

Silvio Berlusconi's conservative governing coalition two weeks ago unveiled the austerity measures, which include public-sector wage freezes, higher fees for doctor visits and fewer transfers of funds from the central state to local administrations.

The government was hoping that the unveiling of the plan would be enough to fend off market concerns over Italy's solvency. But on Friday and Monday investors fled the country's bonds in part because of fears that Mr. Berlusconi might not have the political support needed to get the plan through both houses of parliament in a speedy way.
 
Silvio Berlusconi's conservative governing coalition two weeks ago unveiled the austerity measures, which include public-sector wage freezes, higher fees for doctor visits and fewer transfers of funds from the central state to local administrations.

How convenient.

I said it before: the western governments are doing all they can to make themselves "more competitive" in the face of a yuan that is taking too long to appreciate. We are seeing a great balancing act with China, which was inevitably going to occur on its own as this is a guaranteed result of trade between different countries, but since the Western countries' "competitiveness" was not going up as fast as China's was going down (read: our standard of living was not falling as fast as the Chinese' standard of living was rising), the governments are now forced to take action and speed up the process to bring life back to the economy. So the trick is to declare all governments unsolvable, and implement austerity measures to make us all cheaper workers.

And eventually, all western countries who don't follow will find themselves in an uncompetitive position. So everyone will have to join the ride down.

I wonder when we Canadians will see our own "austerity measures" crammed down our throats. One thing is certain: it will come.
 
ThisWreckage said:
Is Germany the only anomaly in the EU?

2zfojyo.jpg


I doubt they can stay in this position forever.
 
It's no coincidence that the countries doing the best in the worldwide economy are primarily the ones that are isolationist, neutral in terms of war, and part of no union.
 
Dead Man said:
I'm not seeing how that is the case

If there was one world currency, the crash would not matter as much. Italy would simply become... Europe's New Jersey... or something. Do Americans feel like each state should have its own currency? I'm not necessarily in favour of one currency, but this is not really a solid argument against it.

Maybe I don't understand though, my grasp of economics as anything other than applied psychology is limited.
United currencies work best in transfer unions: that is, political entities in which it is acceptable (on the balance) to residents of one region that their tax dollars be siphoned (in part) to service other regions of the union. The United States is an example of such a transfer union. So is the United Kingdom: Liverpool may be performing shoddily and require funds from London to keep the schools open and the roads safe, but nobody complains much. This bargain is palatable (in part) because of the sense of shared sacrifice, common cause, and collective governance.

This is NOT the case in Europe. Germany is not pleased about paying Greece's public-sector debts because (in part) they feel they have no say in how Greece has spent its money. When the wealthier parts of Europe try to construct a debt-relief plan it includes heavy austerity measures because the banks (and the populace) in these wealthy parts feel they aren't running some charity; the Greeks resent it because they feel put upon by foreigners. Thus the Eurozone is being smashed against the reality of insufficient common purpose- common sovereignty, common tax-raising authority, common finance and spending policies.

It's reasonable to expect, I think, much the same would happen with a single world currency. There must be a counterflow to the flight of capital and the loss of demand; transfer unions are one way for that to happen and not bloody likely in a worldwide currency regime. The other best option is currency revaluation.
 
Ether_Snake said:
Here we go again!

All of Europe is being scammed. Like the US with its too big to fail banks, Europe will have to bail out everyone and take on massive debt to attempt to save the EU, and in the end countries will still default anyway. It's the exact same scenario as what happened in the US with banks, identical.

The strongest economies of Europe are going to be brought down to attempt to save the weakest, which will all default anyway. It's smart. This is how you make a rich person, poor. You invest his money in bad stocks.

How much are Europeans willing to enlarge their national debts just to "save face"?

Unlike the TARP bailout the PIIGS bailouts won't be profitable. Citigroup, JP Morgan, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley and even Lehman/Bear Stearns were illiquid not insolvent like Greece and Portugal.

This is NOT the case in Europe. Germany is not pleased about paying Greece's public-sector debts because (in part) they feel they have no say in how Greece has spent its money. When the wealthier parts of Europe try to construct a debt-relief plan it includes heavy austerity measures because the banks (and the populace) in these wealthy parts feel they aren't running some charity; the Greeks resent it because they feel put upon by foreigners. Thus the Eurozone is being smashed against the reality of insufficient common purpose- common sovereignty, common tax-raising authority, common finance and spending policies.

Additionally US citizens can and do move amongst the states and regions, matching capital flows amongst the US with labour flows. In the EU a Greek is unlikely to pick up and move to France due to the incredible differences in culture, labour practices and language.
 
Evlar said:
United currencies work best in transfer unions: that is, political entities in which it is acceptable (on the balance) to residents of one region that their tax dollars be siphoned (in part) to service other regions of the union. The United States is an example of such a transfer union. So is the United Kingdom: Liverpool may be performing shoddily and require funds from London to keep the schools open and the roads safe, but nobody complains much. This bargain is palatable (in part) because of the sense of shared sacrifice, common cause, and collective governance.

This is NOT the case in Europe. Germany is not pleased about paying Greece's public-sector debts because (in part) they feel they have no say in how Greece has spent its money. When the wealthier parts of Europe try to construct a debt-relief plan it includes heavy austerity measures because the banks (and the populace) in these wealthy parts feel they aren't running some charity; the Greeks resent it because they feel put upon by foreigners. Thus the Eurozone is being smashed against the reality of insufficient common purpose- common sovereignty, common tax-raising authority, common finance and spending policies.

It's reasonable to expect, I think, much the same would happen with a single world currency. There must be a counterflow to the flight of capital and the loss of demand; transfer unions are one way for that to happen and not bloody likely in a worldwide currency regime. The other best option is currency revaluation.
Thankyou. That makes much more sense.
 
Dead Man said:
I'm not seeing how that is the case

If there was one world currency, the crash would not matter as much. Italy would simply become... Europe's New Jersey... or something. Do Americans feel like each state should have its own currency? I'm not necessarily in favour of one currency, but this is not really a solid argument against it.

Maybe I don't understand though, my grasp of economics as anything other than applied psychology is limited.

The analogy to the US doesn't work for an important reason: states are required by law to have balanced operating budgets. Therefore it is not possible for states to accrue debt on the same scale as the federal government or other nations like Greece and Italy.
 
tokkun said:
The analogy to the US doesn't work for an important reason: states are required by law to have balanced operating budgets. Therefore it is not possible for states to accrue debt on the same scale as the federal government or other nations like Greece and Italy.

Some states do, many don't.
 
I have a solution:

Throw Italy, Spain, Portugal, Greece and Ireland out of the European Union. Invite them back in some time later when their politicians and public are mature enough for political union - so see you in about 80 years.

Oh, and please throw Greece out twice for good measure.
 
Ether_Snake said:
Here we go again!

All of Europe is being scammed. Like the US with its too big to fail banks, Europe will have to bail out everyone and take on massive debt to attempt to save the EU, and in the end countries will still default anyway. It's the exact same scenario as what happened in the US with banks, identical.

The strongest economies of Europe are going to be brought down to attempt to save the weakest, which will all default anyway. It's smart. This is how you make a rich person, poor. You invest his money in bad stocks.

How much are Europeans willing to enlarge their national debts just to "save face"?


if Italy is Europe's third largest economy, how can the other countries afford to bail them out?

Its almost like the banks are shitting on the very countries that bailed them out in the first place. Rather than being even a tiny bit humble, its like 'oh thanks, back to business, if we lower your credit rating we'll make a fortune betting against your currency lol'
 
mrklaw said:
if Italy is Europe's third largest economy, how can the other countries afford to bail them out?

Its almost like the banks are shitting on the very countries that bailed them out in the first place. Rather than being even a tiny bit humble, its like 'oh thanks, back to business, if we lower your credit rating we'll make a fortune betting against your currency lol'

They can't. That's why this is bad. Although it's not like you couldn't see this coming, Italy was going to have to pay for it's corruption eventually.
 
TacticalFox88 said:
Jesus Christ, is there a European country NOT fucked up finacially?
netherlands.

also france and germany. Germany has quite high unemployment though I think?
 
catfish said:
Germany has quite high unemployment though I think?

6,9 %, though there are increasingly more temporary worker or jobs which need financial support from government.

Why does the USA still have such a good rating when the Republicans and Democrats are incapable of finding a solution?
 
Shiggy said:
Why does the USA still have such a good rating when the Republicans and Democrats are incapable of finding a solution?

Because all the (influential) rating agencies are US corporations. It really is the only reason.
 
jorma said:
Because all the (influential) rating agencies are US corporations. It really is the only reason.
Plus, they can print dollars and have USD debt, plus they're problem is political, not economic (since they have such lower taxes compared to the rest of the developed world, they can raise them anytime they want, unlike Portugal, e.g., which can't really pay for much more taxes).

(but yeah, rating agencies being American is also a reason)
 
jorma said:
adding norway, sweden, denmark, finland
sorry, I wasn't counting the countries that didn't tie themselves to the sinking ship made of eurobux
 
John Dunbar said:
finland gots the eurobux
:O really? Never been/didn't know this, I thought Scandinavia in general pulled the avoid on the euro.
 
catfish said:
sorry, I wasn't counting the countries that didn't tie themselves to the sinking ship made of eurobux

well tacticalfox asked for european countries and not eurozoned countries, so i sort of went with that..=)
 
catfish said:
:O really? Never been/didn't know this, I thought Scandinavia in general pulled the avoid on the euro.
Finland has been in the eurozone from day 1 and generally speaking it has had a really good effect on the country's economy. Well up until now of course since soon we'll be in the bottom of the sea with euro and the rest of Europe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom