-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Revolution Thanksgiving 2006
- Thread starter stone128
- Start date
Mama Smurf said:
Dude, you were jumping up and down and focused on only one part while ignoring the others.................
Oogami said:
That's the lack of quality control too. Which was my point.
Plus when did I say that they published Quest 64 and Superman 64? Read. Letting those games to appear on your console is an example of lack of quality control.
So calm down, I know all Nintendo fans are all very angry in this thread. Everyone should.
Zerodoppler
Member
It's nice to know that it'll be at least as powerful as the gamecube. But really, if they don't overprice the system, there is no reason for me not to get it regardless of lack of horsepower.
Nintendo SOQ :
Nintendo on Metal gear 3 : WTF is this crap!
Kojima : WTF?
Nintendo : but for lets say 100.000 we will give it a SOQ
Kojima : Fuck you! im going to sony
Nintendo on some EA shit : This game is garbage!!
EA : ?WTF??
Nintendo : But for lets say.. 60.000 we will give it a SOQ
EA : Ok.. but allow us to put mario in it
Nintendo on Metal gear 3 : WTF is this crap!
Kojima : WTF?
Nintendo : but for lets say 100.000 we will give it a SOQ
Kojima : Fuck you! im going to sony
Nintendo on some EA shit : This game is garbage!!
EA : ?WTF??
Nintendo : But for lets say.. 60.000 we will give it a SOQ
EA : Ok.. but allow us to put mario in it
Mama Smurf
My penis is still intact.
Oogami said:
...no it wasn't. I can't believe I have to explain your own point to you here! This is ridiculous.
Your point was that you think Nintendo's decision not to publish that game is in some way a new quality control that didn't exist during their previous system's releases, and that it's hurting Nintendo to do that. But it's no different. Nintendo aren't stopping that game coming out on their system, just like they didn't stop Superman 64 and Quest 64. They are simply passing up the chance to publish it. If another publisher picks it up and wants to being it to the Revolution, Nintendo will let them!
I repeat, as far as we know there is no difference between the way Nintendo are handling games coming to Revolution and the way they did on the last couple of consoles.
You didn't you freak! But when you compare Nintendo turning down PUBLISHING a game to Nintendo allowing a crap game to be released on their system, it's an obvious and sensible thing to point out that the game can still come out without Nintendo publishing, just like the N64 games you mentioned!
Yes, it is. That wasn't your point though, no matter how much you want to change it.
I think you'll find my posts and most people's were perfectly civil before you started bringing your retardedness into it.
You know, I should just put you on ignore, but the accidental hilarity you bring to threads is just too good to miss too often.
Mama Smurf
My penis is still intact.
Oogami said:
I just don't know. I want to believe no one could be so utterly stupid as to not be able to follow a simple point from one post to their own, especially when the quote is right there above their reply...but you know, I've been to gamefaqs.
So joke character? Or Shadow the Hedgehog buyer? It's so hard to choose.
BlueTsunami
there is joy in sucking dick
Someone over at B3D brought up a really good point. If these specs are real Revolution specs, portability from games made on the 360 or PS3 will almost become impossible unless that game gets a serious downgrade. Most developers probably won't even bother porting anymore.
Mama Smurf
My penis is still intact.
Oooooh I see. He's 11. It all makes more sense now.
He's not a typical joke character if he is one. Normally people who make them don't go in for making themselves look so stupid. But when someone outright tells him that the Nintento seal of quality is no guarantee a game is fun, and he replies with:
You have to start to wonder. You might as well have said food is edible and have him reply "Then how come carrots aren't edible?" for all the sense he makes. It's something you'd epect even the most retarded of people to be able to follow, unless they were delibrately going out of their way not to.
BlueTsunami
there is joy in sucking dick
Oh god, the advent of the gamecube 1.5 comments
:lol
:lol
Mama Smurf
My penis is still intact.
That third party port thing was brought up ages ago BT, but I don't blame you for not seeing, the thread is huge.
BlueTsunami
there is joy in sucking dick
Mama Smurf said:
Ahhh ok. I figured this massive thread had to have brought up that issue :lol
Sweedishrodeo
the smegma spreader
theres no way im reading this whole thread .... can someone sum up the GAF reaction, which i imagine was like,
"ZOMGGgGgGgg hohohoo xbox1.5 ^o^ kekekekeke"
kthanks.
"ZOMGGgGgGgg hohohoo xbox1.5 ^o^ kekekekeke"
kthanks.
Sweedishrodeo said:
Red Corner - "It's the controller that counts", "It says nothing about the FINAL version of Rev", "Who knows who these so called developers are anyway?"
Blue/Black/Green Corners - "Nintedooooomed!", "ahahahaha", "Nintendo haven't got a clue".
You know, The usual.
Fixed that up for you there.
3rd party *publishers* are not going to matter much on the Rev is my prediction. People can get multi platform games on the 360 or ps3. Instead, Nintendo is going to fund a crapload of 3rd party *developers* and publish the games themselfs. They have the cash and that way there will be plenty of unique games. They can do it because dev costs will be lower than on the other platforms.
They already started doing this on the DS. Meteos, ouendan, trace memory, etc etc.
Sweedishrodeo
the smegma spreader
Drinky Crow said:
:lol that was a good read. also, drinky's avatar is the best on gaf right now.
Sweedishrodeo
the smegma spreader
Grug said:
FTW
deadhorse32
Bad Art
Nice thread guys. Drinky post sums up my feeling quite well.
PS3 + Rev FTW
PS3 + Rev FTW
The damage control from the Nintendo fanboys and the trolling from the Sony/Xbox ones is really awful in this one. I'm not taking any sides because I'm getting a PS3 *and* a Rev regardless because I need my Metroid/Zelda/Metal Gear/GTA/Mario/ICO Team fix.
While I knew it was impossible from the start, I would have liked for the Rev to be in between the X360 and PS3 in terms of power because then you'd get games that use the revmote and competing graphics. Still, I can deal with having graphics that are slightly better than this gen with a consistant 60FPS (if the console and additional controllers are cheap). I know in 2010 the Rev will look very dated and no HD will be a bigger factor but then that's what I'll be using my PS3 for.
The only people who lose out of this are people who only have a Rev and people who don't buy a Rev because of the alledged inferior graphics.
While I knew it was impossible from the start, I would have liked for the Rev to be in between the X360 and PS3 in terms of power because then you'd get games that use the revmote and competing graphics. Still, I can deal with having graphics that are slightly better than this gen with a consistant 60FPS (if the console and additional controllers are cheap). I know in 2010 the Rev will look very dated and no HD will be a bigger factor but then that's what I'll be using my PS3 for.
The only people who lose out of this are people who only have a Rev and people who don't buy a Rev because of the alledged inferior graphics.
BlueTsunami
there is joy in sucking dick
elostyle said:
I actual think that this thread has been a little more on the civil side. A large percentage of the posts have more than 2 sentence "wise snaps" remarks about Nintendo. I've thrown a jab here and there but out of jest, nothing serious (i'm seriously intrigued by the Rev's controll scheme). Other than that, its just people voicing their opinions.
Schattenjäger
Gabriel Knight
Nintendogs disagrees with you..Odysseus said:
and before you speak for all those new people that will not be wooed by Nintendo, at least try the controller for yourself
GitarooMan
Member
koam said:
This is a good point. However, what about people who wanted to play Nintendo franchises with "next-gen" visuals (I know that's subjective, but you know what I mean), they lose out, right?. Business wise there are plenty of justifications for Nintendo's direction, but personally as a long-time gamer I feel disappointed they won't bring us Mario and Zelda with some modern visuals. I know I'm not the target for the system, but I wonder if many on this board are the target and what the implications of that is.
As I've said many times, I think this will go over big in Japan, but I wonder about it's future in the West. Will Western developers put resources into Rev games? More importantly, will Nintendo internally develop some games (either 1st or 2nd party) that cater more to Western interests. More than a new control scheme, I think it is crucial for Nintendo to gain more Western support to be successful in NA and EU. I wonder if this will do it, or if Nintendo even cares greatly about the success of Rev in the West.
Those who are saying it will be a second console and will be successful that way are looking at it the wrong way, IMO (given the overall lack of multi-console ownership among casuals). Nintendo has to become a first console choice among the so-called "non-gamers" in order to be successful (in the West). I think they proabably have to launch at 149 to have a chance at that.