Vincent Alexander
Member
It's hard to believe he used to do a shit ton of drugs. I enjoy him though.
Personally, I don't find his stand-up that great. However, I've loved his film roles.aronnov reborn said:nothing against this guy at all but i just dont find him funny. maybe this stuff is funny in England but i guess my American mind is too simple.
I see what you did there D:OuterWorldVoice said:Brand really seems to split people right down the middle. Awesome, sexy smart people seem to think he's amusing and everyone else doesn't.
OuterWorldVoice said:Brand really seems to split people right down the middle. Awesome, sexy smart people seem to think he's amusing and everyone else doesn't.
Your Excellency said:The thing about American's who say he's not funny is that all they've ever seen him in is his shitty movies.
Check out
-His book 'My Booky Wook', the second best autobiography of the last ten years after Dreams from My Father by Barack Obama. Still haven't read the sequel yet...
-His podcasts. Greatest podcast of all time.
-His stand-up comedy.
Saying he's shitty just because of his recent comedy movies is like saying Robert De Niro is shitty just because of his recent comedy movies.
Minus Gervais' shrill and annoying ass laugh (which I've slowly learned to block out) I agree.HiroProtagonist said:And FYI: Ricky Gervais, Stephen Merchant, and Karl Pilkington have the greatest podcast of all time.
HiroProtagonist said:And FYI: Ricky Gervais, Stephen Merchant, and Karl Pilkington have the greatest podcast of all time.
Ulairi said:I was pretty sure Brand was/is an atheists? Anyone know if that changed?
NYR said:Looks great. Nice try at trolling, bro...
I think this post is a splendid example of the sickly anti-intellectual attitude broadly responsible for the social stigma (in the US, if not elsewhere) of being perceived as a cerebral person rather than a man's man or a plastic pseudocelebrislut. Brand's ideas in this interview are solid and he offers some uncommonly keen cultural insights, yet all you can muster in response is a feeble jab at his vocabulary. Your comment says far more about the way you think than about Brand's intellect.anonnumber6 said:I think Brand fits the definition of a pseudo intellectual, anyone that puts so much emphasis on the words longer than 3 syllables in their sentences are trying to hard to look intellectual.
This seemed a bit below Paxman, he rips apart politicians every week on Newsnight in this interview he seems to have held back.
I'm calling bullshit. There is a difference between being anti-intellectual and being frustrated when someone intentionally inserts vocabulary solely for the purpose of looking smarter.Monocle said:I think this post is a splendid example of the sickly anti-intellectual attitude broadly responsible for the social stigma (in the US, if not elsewhere) of being perceived as a cerebral person rather than a man's man or a plastic pseudocelebrislut. Brand's ideas in this interview are solid and he offers some uncommonly keen cultural insights, yet all you can muster in response is a feeble jab at his vocabulary. Your comment says far more about the way you think than about Brand's intellect.
Those who were paying attention may have been impressed by the meaning they conveyed. Anyone can use a thesaurus or memorize five dollar words. It takes more than hot steam between one's ears to place those words in coherent sequence.Ken Masters said:using big words never fails to impress people
I'm impressed that you know how to peer directly into another person's inner life. You could make a lot of money with your infallible ability to recognize other people's intentions.Pastry said:I'm calling bullshit. There is a difference between being anti-intellectual and being frustrated when someone intentionally inserts vocabulary solely for the purpose of looking smarter.
Monocle said:I think this post is a splendid example of the sickly anti-intellectual attitude broadly responsible for the social stigma (in the US, if not elsewhere) of being perceived as a cerebral person rather than a man's man or a plastic pseudocelebrislut. Brand's ideas in this interview are solid and he offers some uncommonly keen cultural insights, yet all you can muster in response is a feeble jab at his vocabulary. Your comment says far more about the way you think than about Brand's intellect.
bjork said:I'm usually not one to say something like this, but it's an absolute crime that they're remaking Drop Dead Fred with this guy. Rik Mayall, he is not.
boundedseven said:Bro, you should see how she looks when she wakes up
MrPliskin said:GTFO. They're ruining DDF!?! NOOOOOO!!!
Partly why I have not gone out of my way to see him in anything.dIEHARD said:I sadly remember him from the MTV awards.. he bombed so bad.
Your Excellency said:Paxman really is a mong in that interview, I just saw the first couple of minutes again, when trying to demonstrate how some people are famous for actually doing something and some people are famous just for being famous, he says "Richard Dawkins is famous for being an atheist" - the fuck? How is that an accomplishment?! And Russell Brand is a huge stand-up comedian, TV presenter, radio presenter, newspaper columnist, author, and actor (and I've probably missed a few things there) - those are obvious accomplishments. Paxman is trolling hardcore. No wonder Brand doesn't wanna live in England anymore, after how he gets treated by both the lowbrow tabloids and the highbrow commentators.
Paxman is trolling hard. Don't feed the troll, guys.
boundedseven said:Bro, you should see how she looks when she wakes up
![]()
Messypandas said:i can't stand the way he 'elucidates' every sentence with his overly-convulted verb dropping. Such verbal-diarrhea. Doesn't make you sound smart Russell; just desperate to impress
bjb said:My god...
What is that....
MrPliskin said:A woman. You should try it out sometime when you're not busy pretending to be hot shit on the internet.
Seriously, what is with the influx of juniors and their sharpknee's mentality? Are they spoiled by the internet and this fantasy world of what women look like? Katy Perry is still hotter than a pretty large majority of the women most of us (as in Men, not "us" like internet people) encounter / interact with.
Or do you guy's not understand that bad pictures / expressions happen? Silly kiddo's.
MrPliskin said:The first few months of new Junior waves are always the most painful as hundreds of return Gamefaqs rejects get yet another account perm'd from GAF.
On the brighter side, it's always threads like this that help fill my ignore list, and purge the good from the bad here on GAF.![]()
I have no problem with people liking the content of that interview but I myself prefer it without the window dressing.Monocle said:I think this post is a splendid example of the sickly anti-intellectual attitude broadly responsible for the social stigma (in the US, if not elsewhere) of being perceived as a cerebral person rather than a man's man or a plastic pseudocelebrislut. Brand's ideas in this interview are solid and he offers some uncommonly keen cultural insights, yet all you can muster in response is a feeble jab at his vocabulary. Your comment says far more about the way you think than about Brand's intellect.
He's now a Free Presbytirian.Ulairi said:I was pretty sure Brand was/is an atheists? Anyone know if that changed?
mattoz85 said:I saw him host SNL and he was terrible. His monologue consisted entirely of him telling everyone why he was famous. Then he did a horrible American accent in his first skit, and I just couldn't take it anymore.
I really don't find him funny. His voice is very grating and he looks ridiculous.
Pastry said:I'm calling bullshit. There is a difference between being anti-intellectual and being frustrated when someone intentionally inserts vocabulary solely for the purpose of looking smarter.
Meus Renaissance said:Being verbose doesn't equate to being an intellectual - you can't make that judgement of someone on a 15 min interview. What you can, however, clearly make out from this short interview is his ability to articulate himself with a grasp of vocabulary few are common with. In this aspect, it's not relevant who the name of the person is, but rather what they are saying and how they are saying it; this could be a complete stranger on the street being interviewed and you would get a similar level of admiration for the way he/she conveys himself. It's really a component of character that is rare nowdays - I could perhaps count with one hand the amount of people who I've met that 'speak' like this
HiResDes said:Well speaking like that is in part impractical in common, daily interactions...Therefore, just because most people don't speak like that, doesn't mean that they can't...Hell you don't even know whether or not Brand speaks like that outside of televised interviews.
Ninja Scooter said:he has a strange face. He looks like Rocky Dennis.