• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Sally Yates testifies before Senate subcmte re: Flynn/Russ today 2:30EST (livestream)

Watch the livestream here: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/russian-interference-in-the-2016-united-states-election

Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtIQdneqlq4

Sally Yates is about to bring back the Russia story in a big way
(CNN) Former acting Attorney General Sally Yates will testify in front of a Senate subcommittee Monday about what and when she told the Trump White House in regard to Michael Flynn's ties to Russia.

Yates' testimony will push the story of the Trump campaign's alleged ties to Russia back into the headlines, especially, if expected, she asserts that she warned Trump campaign officials that Flynn, the now-deposed national security adviser, was not telling the full truth about his contacts with Russian ambassador to the US Sergey Kislyak.

Both White House chief of staff Reince Priebus and press secretary Sean Spicer have asserted that Yates passed along information about which the White House counsel checked out and found nothing

President Donald Trump has repeatedly insisted that the Russia investigations on Capitol Hill -- and the idea that senior members of his campaign were closely involved with Russian intelligence officials -- are "fake news," a theme he kept up on Twitter Sunday.

He made a similar point on Monday, accusing the Obama administration of not properly vetting Flynn when he led the Defense Intelligence Agency during his predecessor's term: "General Flynn was given the highest security clearance by the Obama Administration - but the Fake News seldom likes talking about that."

He quickly added: "Ask Sally Yates, under oath, if she knows how classified information got into the newspapers soon after she explained it to W.H. (counsel)."

The problem for Trump is that there is a whole lot of smoke already surrounding his campaign and its ties to Russia -- with Flynn at the center of it all. Flynn was forced to resign after lying to Vice President Mike Pence about his conversations with Kislyak, but since that time, we've learned he reportedly didn't properly report a speech he gave to a RT-TV, a Russia propaganda arm, and that he was paid at least $500,000 to represent Turkey's interests during the 2016 campaign. Late last week, The Washington Post reported that Flynn has been warned by Trump transition officials about the danger of speaking with Kislyak -- a detail CNN has now confirmed.

Polling suggests there is significant suspicion regarding the Trump campaign's contacts with Russia. In an April Washington Post-ABC News poll, 56% of those tested said that Russia tried to influence the election. Of that group the bulk -- 39% -- said the Trump campaign "intentionally" helped Russia's meddling.

The CIA and FBI have confirmed their belief that Russia sought to meddle in the election and that the country's interference was aimed at trying to keep Hillary Clinton from winning. There's no evidence yet that there was any sort of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.

The re-emergence of the Russia investigation comes after, arguably, one of the better weeks of the Trump presidency -- capped by the House's passage of the American Health Care Act on Thursday.

Depending on what Yates says -- and how the White House reacts -- any momentum built from last week (and I am somewhat skeptical there was much) could disappear into thin air. Regardless, Yates' testimony -- and the latest news about Flynn -- is a reminder that the Russia story just isn't going anywhere anytime soon.

Trump and his administration are clearly frustrated by the Russia drumbeat. But their dismissive approach could well come back to bite them in regards Flynn this week and potentially in the future.

Whether this President likes it or not, the Russia story isn't going away anytime soon. Given that, he and his senior team have to figure out a better message than they've had to date.
Trump today:

m99xx50.png
 
I'm caught between having intense interest in what she has to say and having zero faith in that committee to have any sort of spine about it.
 

RaidenZR

Member
As expected but holy fuck at these tweets. "But, but Obama..."

You appointed him to National Security Adviser, for fuck's sake. Take some responsibility. At 70 years old, the man has never taken accountability for anything in his life. Finger pointing like he's 8 and momma caught him tipping over the cookie jar.
 
As expected but holy fuck at these tweets. "But, but Obama..."

You appointed him to National Security Adviser, for fuck's sake. Take some responsibility. At 70 years old, the man has never taken accountability for anything in his life. Finger pointing like he's 8 and momma caught him tipping over the cookie jar.

The thing Republicans always leave out is that Obama fired Flynn with cause.
 

DonShula

Member
I feel like Yates should be doing this in prime time at 9pm on a Thursday with a pre-game show.

Based on the preemptive moves from the Trump administration in the last 48 hours, Yates is going to say something of interest.
 

RPGCrazied

Member
Hope she brings this administration to its knees. And Trump is scared, he is tweeting like a madman about this.
 
Nothing will come from this. Dont get your hopes up.

Nobody expects some major bomb to be dropped, it just a long continuation of how incompetent and illegitimate the administration is with this entire scandal and how their story is completely fabricated.

The FBI is where this story ends, the public scrutiny comes from things like this.
 
So, is the Senate investigation still a joke and the FBI investigation is the one we should look at?

For results? Yes. But these public hearings give us plebs without security clearance or who aren't working on the case at the FBI some stuff to chew over in the mean time. That's why they're good.

We're going to hear from Yates herself who she warned, what she said. We all know they did nothing until the press forced the issue after the leaks.

The GOP will play distraction bingo, but that won't stop the dems asking pointed questions that we'll all hear the answers to.
 

cameron

Member
Nobody expects some major bomb to be dropped, it just a long continuation of how incompetent and illegitimate the administration is with this entire scandal and how their story is completely fabricated.

The FBI is where this story ends, the public scrutiny comes from things like this.

Basically this. These congressional hearings are for the press/public.
 

DonShula

Member
So, is the Senate investigation still a joke and the FBI investigation is the one we should look at?

Except we have no visibility into the FBI investigation. But we can assume that whatever Yates is about to tell the Senate committee, the FBI already knows it.

For our purposes, the House and Senate committees are just teasing out some of the details in public. The FBI isn't going to tell us anything until they're finished.
 

AlphaDump

Gold Member
I hope shit starts going down soon. Despite all of the smoke, the media is totally disengaged from even reporting on it, and has effectively turned the most reasonable into "conspiracy theorists".

Literally no one has got in trouble.
 
I hope shit starts going down soon. Despite all of the smoke, the media is totally disengaged from even reporting on it, and has effectively turned the most reasonable into "conspiracy theorists".

Literally no one has got in trouble.

We're three months in and this has been covered greatly by the media.
 

flkraven

Member
Having any sort of respect for how something may appear is completely out the window with this administration. How is what Trump is doing not considered interfering with a Senate investigation?

What is even more bs is that Republicans will be right back out there calling out the next Democrat President on everything they say, and they still won't understand the complete hypocrisy.
 

Brandon F

Well congratulations! You got yourself caught!
Those Trump tweets scream guilty without the testimony having even started yet.
 
Nobody expects some major bomb to be dropped, it just a long continuation of how incompetent and illegitimate the administration is with this entire scandal and how their story is completely fabricated.

The FBI is where this story ends, the public scrutiny comes from things like this.

Correct. The general public is not privy to the details that have or have not been determined by the FBI. And, as I've said before, they generally don't make a move for high profile cases unless the case they've built is rock solid.

These things take time, and I'm happy that we're at least getting some info. It's not going away, no matter how much air time it does or doesn't get.
 

ahoyhoy

Unconfirmed Member
Trump trying to blame the Obama administration when now we know Obama *personally* told him in their face-to-face not to hire Flynn, and Obama already had fired Flynn, is hilarious.

Of course Trump boosters will read that and believe it, and Trump/his people probably think they're geniuses because of that, but really they're a pack of morons taking advantage of a few decades of legwork by conservative media.

Their hubris being rewarded in this way is one thing -- it got them the White House FFS -- but they're also an admin crawling with people who keep doing stupid shit. Like Kushner not disclosing basically anything. Flynn. Manafort before him. Gorka being literally one step short of a secret Nazi cult member. Everything related to Steve Bannon and his tryhard dark lord nonsense.

Maybe it won't make it to Trump himself but it's hard not to imagine a bunch of these guys getting clipped by the feds before the four years are up.

Dumbass Trump probably thought that Obama fired Flynn for political reasons and took his warning not to hire him as confirmation of this fact.

Dude must have been surrounded by yes men in the beginning. It's looking like he purged his first round of yes men and bringing in another group.
 

AndyD

aka andydumi
I expect to learn more about what the administration knew and did regarding Michael Flynn. Ta da!

Things don't have to directly and immediately lead to perp walks to be important or interesting.

Pretty much this. The classic "what did you know and when did you know it" question. Because it can open the door to further and more specific investigations, subpoenas, hearings and so forth.
 
Top Bottom