• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Seagate Reaches Terabit Areal Density Milestone

Status
Not open for further replies.

clav

Member
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/seagate-terabit-milestone-areal-density-HDD,15054.html

Seagate Reaches Terabit Areal Density Milestone

This new areal density milestone could pave the way to 3.5-inch drives with 60 TB capacities.

Seagate said on Monday that it has become the first HDD manufacturer to achieve the milestone storage density of 1 terabit per square inch. It was accomplished by using heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) instead of the traditional Perpendicular Magnetic Recording (PMR) method. This achievement is expected to pave the way to 3.5-inch HDDs with 60 TB capacities possibly just over a decade away... if we're even using hard drives by then, that is.

"Hard drive manufacturers increase areal density and capacity by shrinking a platter’s data bits to pack more within each square inch of disk space," the company explains. "They also tighten the data tracks, the concentric circles on the disk’s surface that anchor the bits. The key to areal density gains is to do both without disruptions to the bits’ magnetization, a phenomenon that can garble data."

Yet by using HAMR technology, Seagate said that it has achieved a linear bit density of about 2 million bits per inch, resulting in a data density of just over 1 trillion bits, or 1 terabit, per square inch -- 55-percent higher than today’s areal density ceiling of 620 gigabits per square inch.

Seagate said that the first generation of HAMR drives, at just over 1 terabit per square inch, will likely more than double the capacities of the largest 3.5-inch and 2.5-inch hard drives on the market today, resulting in 6 TB and 2 TB drives respectively at the very least. With a theoretical areal density limit ranging from 5 to 10 terabits per square inch, capacities will likely reach to 30 TB to 60 TB for 3.5-inch drives and 10 TB to 20 TB for 2.5-inch drives.

"The growth of social media, search engines, cloud computing, rich media and other data-hungry applications continues to stoke demand for ever greater storage capacity," said Mark Re, senior vice president of Heads and Media Research and Development at Seagate. "Hard disk drive innovations like HAMR will be a key enabler of the development of even more data-intense applications in the future, extending the ways businesses and consumers worldwide use, manage and store digital content."

Seagate achieved the 1 terabit per square inch breakthroughs in materials science and near-field optics at its heads and media research and development centers in Bloomington, Minnesota, and Fremont, California.

RIP "Get perpendicular" ad campaign.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xPvD0Z9kz8
 
D

Deleted member 284

Unconfirmed Member
...in the cloud, obviously

image.php


Sorry, but I just pictured him VVVVV saying it.
 

Bombadil

Banned
The main consumer demographic for 60 terabyte drives will probably be males aged 16 to 50. And we all know why.
 

squidyj

Member
I know it's not your department Seagate but I'd rather hear about higher RAM density IMOTBH. Or memristor tech.
 

Kraut

Member
But with the cloud we don't need physical storage?

I'm naively of this mind-set. As long as other storage and communication tech doesn't hit any snags, my uneducated expectation is that most devices will have a moderately large capacity SSD and some kind of 3G/4G/[successor]G internet connection, and most storage will be on a cloud service. I'm sure enthusiasts will have a use for 60TB drives, but I can't see it being huge for the layman consumer.
 

saunderez

Member
I'm naively of this mind-set. As long as other storage and communication tech doesn't hit any snags, my uneducated expectation is that most devices will have a moderately large capacity SSD and some kind of 3G/4G/[successor]G internet connection, and most storage will be on a cloud service. I'm sure enthusiasts will have a use for 60TB drives, but I can't see it being huge for the layman consumer.

You don't want to store all your data in the cloud because if you can't access the cloud you can't access your data. All it will take is a massive network failure of some kind and you're SOL. Local storage will never disappear due to this.
 

squidyj

Member
I'm naively of this mind-set. As long as other storage and communication tech doesn't hit any snags, my uneducated expectation is that most devices will have a moderately large capacity SSD and some kind of 3G/4G/[successor]G internet connection, and most storage will be on a cloud service. I'm sure enthusiasts will have a use for 60TB drives, but I can't see it being huge for the layman consumer.

If only it was 60TB of 0 latency massive bandwidth non-volatile storage. Then we'd be on to something.
 

JJD

Member
I don't know why, but when I saw the thread title I read "Segata Reaches Terabit Areal Density Milestone" :-(
 

Bombadil

Banned
I'm naively of this mind-set. As long as other storage and communication tech doesn't hit any snags, my uneducated expectation is that most devices will have a moderately large capacity SSD and some kind of 3G/4G/[successor]G internet connection, and most storage will be on a cloud service. I'm sure enthusiasts will have a use for 60TB drives, but I can't see it being huge for the layman consumer.

Until one day the providers offering cloud start making rules about what you can store on their service.
 

neorej

ERMYGERD!
I'm naively of this mind-set. As long as other storage and communication tech doesn't hit any snags, my uneducated expectation is that most devices will have a moderately large capacity SSD and some kind of 3G/4G/[successor]G internet connection, and most storage will be on a cloud service. I'm sure enthusiasts will have a use for 60TB drives, but I can't see it being huge for the layman consumer.

Yeah, because your precious family-photos on Megaupload are always available, right?
 

Hazaro

relies on auto-aim
1 TB = 1,000,000,000,000 bytes
One square inch. What entirety of works of knowledge and history can put into something smaller than a thumb.

Truly one of those things that needs to be taken a step back at times and marvel at.
I disassembled an old 1.8" drive recently and the tiny light weight ring in that was 30GB and still is incredible.
 

abusori

Member
I don't know why, but when I saw the thread title I read "Segata Reaches Terabit Areal Density Milestone" :-(

Segata Sanshiro
Segata Sanshiro
Sega Saturn, shiro♪〜


*ahem*
I hope they get at least 10TB drives going soon. I'd love to put a couple of those in my pc.
 

clav

Member
1 TB = 1,000,000,000,000 bytes
One square inch. What entirety of works of knowledge and history can put into something smaller than a thumb.

Truly one of those things that needs to be taken a step back at times and marvel at.
I disassembled an old 1.8" drive recently and the tiny light weight ring in that was 30GB and still is incredible.

Once this tech takes off, 6TB desktop and 2TB laptop drives will be appearing on the market and within a decade size increases will be 10x.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom