Except, she was talking about Fantasia, not newer Disney films. I still think it's retarded to pit all of Japanese animation against one American flick, though. It's like she went out of her way to offend Anime.
I was specifically responding to Jett's quote.
Eh, even the highest budget anime film ever(Spirited Away) has a relatively low amount of frames compared to a recent Disney film like Tarzan. There's just no comparison on a technical level.
Budgets are a bad way of judging anything for a film other than success/profit, heh.
I don't think I've ever considered pure frame count to be a sign of superior quality for an animated film. That would leave out complexity, detail, coloring, and a mess of other things which needs to be taken into account as well. Older disney material is great but saying its technically because of amount of frames is pretty short-sighted.
As for crudely drawn, I can't really agree. As mentioned just beforehand, there are quite a handful less frames in any given anime than in any Disney flick. Also of note are the simplistic/utilitarian art that most anime use.
It's a style, one that's simpler...dunno about crude, but it definitely is simpler.
Simpler? That's the first time I've ever heard anyone say that about anime
. I've always seen Anime > Disney/Western in terms of complexity and detail per frame while Disney/Western > Anime for actual frames that are animated from folks I've talked to. Mind you, I'm talking about films and not general animation like TV shows.