CoolTrick said:![]()
This shot looks pretty good.
olimario said:It's looking worse than some older screens I saw. The only difference with the IGN shot is the color. Resize that summabitch and itll look the same.
olimario said:It's looking worse than some older screens I saw. The only difference with the IGN shot is the color. Resize that summabitch and itll look the same.
If you notice the one bush looks a little healthier in the screen on the right, but the other bush is gone. It's battle damage.Matlock said:
Varian said:If you notice the one bush looks a little healthier in the screen on the right, but the other bush is gone. It's battle damage.
monchi-kun said:why do people bother with realistic-style graphics on the DS when we all know that we are fine with cute/super-deformed/sprites/nintendog's grafex!!!!
mckmas8808 said:Like why did they even make a Splinter Cell for DS?
SonicMegaDrive said:Note to 3rd party publishers: Stick to 2D games on the DS.
cyberheater said:I was going to agree but i've played Mario on nDS and it looks pretty good in a handheld N64 kind of way. Much better then these screen shots.
Jonnyboy117 said:Mario isn't a third-party game.