Freeza Under The Shower
Member
We all know the various miracle diets: paleo, keto, sugarless, vegan, pigeon, sugar only... or something.
All of them are high-profile diets (or fads) and can be summarized as three ideas of what humans are supposed to eat and what humans are. First off, we have the idea of humans as natural apex predator carnivores. Second, we have the idea of humans as banana, berry, and high fat avocado eater. And third is give or take the modern 'dunno, donna care' diet (the sugary one).
Except when someone bothers to actually ask "what do humans eat", there's no case for any of them: Debunking The Paleo Diet
Now don't me wrong, the 'sugar overdose' diet is definitely not looking good (and I would not recommend it if you want to live long). However, we can ask whether it matters if your goal is weight loss and you're using a calorie deficit.
It's a lot easier to reach that goal on a high-fat and / or high-protein diet, but that's another matter.
But here's the thing, and I'm asking because it's been bothering me in the context of fitness and weight / fat loss: there is no compelling evidence that humans are made or even meant to eat meat other than the occasional special event of some kind, yet we maintain this idea that we are apex predator carnivores and we've even tied the idea of eating meat to masculinity. As if you couldn't be a man if you just ate eggs instead of meat? Or fucking broccoli for that matter?
So aside from the very specific purpose of using a high-protein, high-fat diet to lose weight, and the very specific amino acids found in meat, what possible reason would people with a 'normal' weight have to eat meat? or least in the quantities and frequency we're used to in Western countries?
The issue is that fat can be gained from cheese as well (a common dish component outside of the West), and protein could just as easily be gained from beans, tofu and other agricultural vegetables we've created over time.
Is there a non-moral, non-normative reason (like say, statistical instead) to give for why we should consume meat, given that we don't lose access to eggs, diary, and other possible animal products?
This is not a pro-vegan thread or whatever, just to clarify. I'm just wondering if I'm missing something.
All of them are high-profile diets (or fads) and can be summarized as three ideas of what humans are supposed to eat and what humans are. First off, we have the idea of humans as natural apex predator carnivores. Second, we have the idea of humans as banana, berry, and high fat avocado eater. And third is give or take the modern 'dunno, donna care' diet (the sugary one).
Except when someone bothers to actually ask "what do humans eat", there's no case for any of them: Debunking The Paleo Diet
Now don't me wrong, the 'sugar overdose' diet is definitely not looking good (and I would not recommend it if you want to live long). However, we can ask whether it matters if your goal is weight loss and you're using a calorie deficit.
It's a lot easier to reach that goal on a high-fat and / or high-protein diet, but that's another matter.
But here's the thing, and I'm asking because it's been bothering me in the context of fitness and weight / fat loss: there is no compelling evidence that humans are made or even meant to eat meat other than the occasional special event of some kind, yet we maintain this idea that we are apex predator carnivores and we've even tied the idea of eating meat to masculinity. As if you couldn't be a man if you just ate eggs instead of meat? Or fucking broccoli for that matter?
So aside from the very specific purpose of using a high-protein, high-fat diet to lose weight, and the very specific amino acids found in meat, what possible reason would people with a 'normal' weight have to eat meat? or least in the quantities and frequency we're used to in Western countries?
The issue is that fat can be gained from cheese as well (a common dish component outside of the West), and protein could just as easily be gained from beans, tofu and other agricultural vegetables we've created over time.
Is there a non-moral, non-normative reason (like say, statistical instead) to give for why we should consume meat, given that we don't lose access to eggs, diary, and other possible animal products?
This is not a pro-vegan thread or whatever, just to clarify. I'm just wondering if I'm missing something.