• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Should I be worried by this avatar?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jeffahn

Member
_kills.gif


Not mine.

???
 
well 2 years ago I would have said "Wow that is cool" just like I did when I saw it for the first time two years ago
 
I apologise for not having seen all animated-gif avatars over the last two years, maybe I should travel back in time to catch the ones I missed out on.

...
 
Jeffahn said:
I apologise for not having seen all animated-gif avatars over the last two years, maybe I should travel back in time to catch the ones I missed out on.

...


Will you use the

The Terminator method which will se you permanently shift two years into the past.

Or

The back to the future method which will allow you to return to present after viewing the avatars, this will alter the present time removing this thread.
 
Do The Mario said:
Will you use the

The Terminator method which will se you permanently shift two years into the past.

Or

The back to the future method which will allow you to return to present after viewing the avatars, this will alter the present time removing this thread.

'The Terminator' method is crap because it doesn't work. You can't be fathered by a dude from the future who's existence depends on you being born, the whole film collapsed just there.

The BttF method is also problematic because *any* activety in the past has the potential to profoundly affect the future.

...
 
Jeffahn said:
You can't be fathered by a dude from the future who's existence depends on you being born, the whole film collapsed just there.

Why not? That's one of the few areas where the film actually made sense.

And if you want really screwed up time-travel parentage, you owe it to yourself to read "All You Zombies Out There" by Robert Heinlein.
 
iapetus said:
Why not? That's one of the few areas where the film actually made sense.

And if you want really screwed up time-travel parentage, you owe it to yourself to read "All You Zombies Out There" by Robert Heinlein.

No, no, no. It made no sense. A simple timeline proves it:

Sarah Conner exists.

Nobody ever came from the future to impregnate her because the impregnation was required to instatiate the supposed proceedings that led to theat dude supposedly being sent back in time to perform the impregnation. Presently-occuring events cannot rely on future events to occur, in both senses.

...
 
Blackace said:
well 2 years ago I would have said "Wow that is cool" just like I did when I saw it for the first time two years ago
Agreed, although it still holds up decently.. there are tons better unfortunately.
 
Scrow said:
those school girls were clearly evil, so i don't see any problem with it.
Yeah, and even then, why should we gender descriminate? Women should have every right to be slaughtered as much as men do!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom