• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Singer talks Superman

Status
Not open for further replies.

ManaByte

Banned
Took a while for the Comic Con Q&A to come out, but here are the links to a transcription a site did and is passing off as an "interview":
http://www.nowplayingmag.com/content/view/2006/2/
http://www.nowplayingmag.com/content/view/2017/2/
http://www.nowplayingmag.com/content/view/2033/2/

A pregnant Lois Lane certainly seems to imply that a modern twist has been given to the Superman fable, especially when you consider that Bosworth’s Lane isn’t even married to the father of her child. “They're not married, no. It's a child out of wedlock – I know, it's very racy,” quips Singer.

Of course, the question must be raised: If Superman is going to attempt to get Lois back, doesn’t that make him a home-wrecker?

“Not a home-wrecker,” Singer responds. “It's just what happens when old boyfriends come back into your life. Something happens, and it's tough. … I think the one thing that makes [the film] more modern is the fact that it is about what happens when old girlfriends come home. The world has moved on since [Clark] was the idealistic young man who emerged from the Fortress of Solitude as Superman. … The biggest creative challenge is just to make a good movie. I don't really care about [being] relevant to today. I don't particularly worry about where we are right now, because where we are right now or what you consider today will be different tomorrow. So I just basically wanted to be respectful to the Superman universe.”

“It's hard,” he says. “You just see a photograph of [the costume] and it represents one thing and people interpret it. It's just a photograph. But then you see it in motion and how we're treating it with lighting and color, [and it’s a different thing]. And this was only our first pass at color timing; this little [Comic-Con] piece was done on the fly, very quickly for this. I think [Superman actor Brandon Routh] sells it: If you were to meet [him] in the suit, that's when you really feel, ‘Oh, that's Superman. I get it.’ I hope it will get a good reaction. I hope it will please people. You know, you can please some of the people some of the time…”

As for Routh’s Clark Kent persona, leaked images from the set of the film have indicated that the look of previous Superman actor Christopher Reeve’s version of Kent has at the very least informed Routh and Singer’s Kent on some level.

“We looked at some of the original Superman, just to take a look at it together. But by no means did I ever say, ‘Act like Christopher Reeve,’” says Singer. “It's weird with Brandon because one moment he's a dead ringer for Christopher Reeve and the next minute he's completely different. So it kind of captures moments. He’ll have moments that recall the first film and then moments when he's his own Clark, and he's his own Superman. … [Clark’s] goofy. He's playing a role. Clark is definitely not young Clark from the farm, although you'll see a bit of that. At the Daily Planet, he's awkward, he's the invisible guy. … As Quentin [Tarantino] said in that picture, [Clark’s] his costume. Superman is [the real] him.”

“We have a city that captures the look of the film, a 1940s love story, so there will be a bit more deco [here, and] Thomas Hart Benton kind of stuff,” he says. “But ultimately it will be based on something between today's New York and the New York of 1938.”

Which isn’t to say that he doesn’t like director Richard Donner’s version of Metropolis from the Christopher Reeve Superman.

“Richard Donner didn't base it loosely on New York City. He made it New York City! He had the Statue of Liberty!” says Singer, while also commenting that he wouldn’t change that film even if he could. “I can’t think of anything [I’d change]. I think that’s a wonderful film. There are things you couldn’t do back then now that we have: rig removal and sophisticated visual effects. You can do things technically that he couldn’t do back then. But I think he did an amazing job for what he had. You couldn’t paint out cables back then; you just had to move the camera in such a way, Christopher Reeve had to act it, and you had to hide things. So what they did was very challenging and we’re trying to meet that challenge today.”

“I feel an enormous responsibility very simply because it's Superman,” he says. “It's an icon that surpasses probably any comic icon and most icons that exist in popular culture. I guarantee, you take the cross and the ‘S’ into a jungle and you will have 50/50 recognition. It's an extraordinary responsibility.”
 
God, it's amazing how much I'm looking forward to this movie for not really like the first one that much. And everything I hear about it makes me want to see it more.
 
Meanwhile, Brandon Routh reinacts a classic Superman moment from the cover of Action Comics #1 in Superman Returns:
supesreturns0069ts.jpg


supesreturns0090sb.jpg


brandon-aug10.jpg


acvd37.jpg


page-1.jpg


Footage:
http://www.kal-el.org/Supermanreturns_joined.avi

Scene in question has Superman holding Kitty Kowalski's (Parker Posey) Ford Mustang in midair and then putting the car down front first and then walking to the driver's side, opening the door and offering his hand to Kitty for assistance.

Interesting Tidbit: The Action Comics cover features a 1938 Ford...So Singer is keeping with tradition. Also while the full San Diego Comic Con footage won't appear online, the SDCC Video Journal over at BlueTights will feature the best parts of the footage. Better than nothing..
 
Great pics :D God I cant wait for this movie.

This pic rocks,suit colors look better and his hair actually looks black now.
brandon-aug10.jpg
 
I can't believe I'm looking forward to a Superman movie...but I am. Hope it's as good for the S as Begins has been to the Bat.
 
Wax Free Vanilla said:
Pfft, Reeves for ever. This new film is going to suck shit and you know it.

superman3cu.jpg

Reeves is the f-ing man and will always be Superman to me,but to say the new film is going to suck shit when all we have seen is blogs and some pics is just beyond stupid.

People that saw footage at the Comic-con said it was amazing,give the film a chance,shit atleast wait till a real trailer is out before you make such biased statements.Also I dont know this film is going to suck shit,I actually think its going to be the complete opposite of that.
 
Fatghost28 said:
IS that a rubber cape??

It's a fruit roll-up strapped to his back.
 
Why would not having Reeve make this a bad movie? Superman III and IV had Reeves and we all know how those turned out :P
 
DMczaf said:
Why would not having Reeves make this a bad movie? Superman III and IV had Reeves and we all know how those turned out :P

Shit Superman IV had Hackman too and it was a turd of epic proportions.I am so damn happy Singer is directing this,imagine if they had chosen someone like Richard Lester again,we could have had Superman & Krypto the Wonderdog fighting bad guys.
 
Matrix said:
Shit Superman IV had Hackman too and it was a turd of epic proportions.I am so damn happy Singer is directing this,imagine if they had chosen someone like Richard Lester again,we could have had Superman & Krypto the Wonderdog fighting bad guys.

Or worse it could of been Tim Burton, McG or Brett Ratner directing. Even Ratner's version of Krypton looked like a rip off of Coruscant and Naboo from Star Wars:


EDIT: Also I did post this in the Blog #20 thread but it got passed over so here's Blog #21:
http://pdl.warnerbros.com/wbmovies/bluetights/speeding_l_21.mov
Journal #21 - In Graphic Detail
Meet Guy Dyas' team of graphic designers. These versatile artists are responsible for a vast portion of the minute details that help to sell each scene to the viewer as being a real place, in a real world.

Neat little blog that has more details in the background than what's presented. Some caps:
2125nb.png


2138yy.png


2158wz.png


2161fj.png


2175ui.png


2186rt.png


2191mb.png


21120ty.png


21150th.png


Those comic panels are from the opening of the movie as the film starts in similiar fashion as that in STM which a kid reading a Superman comic only this time the art and narrative recollects the events in STM. They even went to lengths to duplicate Joe Schuster's original art and colouring.
 
Eh. I'm huge Superman fan, but the only thing that's gotten me moderately excited about this movie were some of the drawings shown a few weeks ago. The live actors haven't looked interesting at all.
 
karasu said:
Eh. I'm huge Superman fan, but the only thing that's gotten me moderately excited about this movie were some of the drawings shown a few weeks ago. The live actors haven't looked interesting at all.
katebosworth8ho.gif


Looks pretty interesting to me.
 
No, she wasn't. Terri hatcher was. Kidder was equally bad. I don't have those early movies on any type of pedestal. The first one ws pretty good, the rest were pretty bad.
 
ManaByte said:
Why not post pictures from the movie as opposed to newspaper shots taking with a 2,000 zoom lens from the roof of a building?

018.jpg

lois03.jpg

Hot.
 
ManaByte said:
Why not post pictures from the movie as opposed to newspaper shots taking with a 2,000 zoom lens from the roof of a building?

018.jpg

lois03.jpg

Because I posted the first pic I found with a Google Image Search. And still I say yuck.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom