Small town is without a police force due to budget constraints

Status
Not open for further replies.

entremet

Member
By ANA CAMPOY

ALTO, Texas—Folks here are bracing for a crime wave after the city put its police force on furlough.

"Everybody's talking about 'bolt your doors, buy a gun,' " said Monty Collins, Alto's mayor, who was against the measure.

But Alto wasn't going to make payroll in the coming months. So the City Council made the call, and on June 15 the police chief and his four officers secured the evidence room, changed the passwords on their computers and locked the department's doors for six months—longer if local finances don't improve by then.

Meanwhile, Cherokee County Sheriff James Campbell, based 12 miles north in Rusk, is policing Alto, a city of about 1,200. Mr. Campbell said the extra load would strain his 25 deputies and reservists, who oversee a 1,000-square-mile territory. The sheriff is already responsible for the nearby city of Wells, which has a population of about 800 and earlier this year shed its only police officer. Crime went up initially, the sheriff said, but has stabilized.

"I'm going to try, but I can't guarantee you there will always be an officer in the town," he said of Alto.

With city budgets tight across the country, police departments are under the gun to cut costs. Some are disbanding special units. Some are shedding other personnel. And some small jurisdictions are doing away with their police forces altogether.

Half Moon Bay, Calif., a picturesque surfside city, is now patrolled by the San Mateo Sheriff's Office after city government earlier this month dissolved the local department to save more than $500,000 a year. Nazareth Borough, Pa., is negotiating a contract for public-safety services with a regional force. In Wenonah, N.J., voters will decide in November whether to sign up with another municipality to replace its seven officers. The move has the potential to slash around $300 to $400 from the average property tax bill of $9,000, in part by reducing employee insurance costs, according to the mayor.

Whether a county sheriff is obligated to provide public-safety services free of charge or is paid for them depends on state law. In most cases, the sheriff's office is paid, said Fred Wilson, director of operations at the National Sheriffs' Association.

The closure of small-town police departments is part of a broader consolidation of services in communities all over the U.S. Keeping the peace is rarely a revenue-making operation and is easier to outsource to county or state agencies than other city responsibilities, such as utilities, some officials say. Others see advantages in having a bigger, more professional force watch over their communities.

Proponents of local police say regional forces are stretched too thin as it is and may not have enough staff to take over security in individual cities. Outsourcing services to a bigger entity also erodes the ties between officers and the community, an essential element in crime fighting, said Mark Marshall, president of the International Association of Chiefs of Police and chief of the Smithfield, Va., police department.

"You get to the more reactive model that was used in the 1960s and 1970s, which was proven not to be the most successful," he said.

Alto, meaning "high" in Spanish for its perch above the wooded countryside, has been struggling. The city-owned natural-gas distribution system from which it derives most of its revenue was in dire need of expensive repairs, wiping out several hundred thousand dollars. Reduced sales and property tax collections from the sluggish economy are putting pressure on the town, where residents mostly make their living in cattle ranching, lumber and the oil and gas industry.

City Council officials calculate a budget shortfall of around $185,000 for the fiscal year ending Sept. 30. It costs about $230,000 to run the police department.

"We had to do something drastic," said Jerry Flowers, councilman and hay farmer. "The police department, being a non-money-making entity, was the easiest to get rid of while we catch our breath and build up some cash."


Some in town, including Police Chief Charles Barron, complain that the city should have cut elsewhere, given local crime. Last year in Alto, which clocks in above the statewide crime rate, there were 39 larcenies, 23 burglaries, two assaults, one robbery and one auto theft, or 66 crimes, compared to 51 the year before, although that year included a rape and four aggravated assaults.

"Why did they totally throw public safety to the wind?" said Chief Barron. "If the city is broke as they say, I would think they can't afford anybody else either."

Mr. Flowers said the council was looking at cuts in other departments and would try to reinstate the police department after the furlough, although he thinks it should employ fewer officers in the future.

Residents are circulating a petition demanding the city government restore the force. Some business owners said they had removed valuable objects they don't use regularly from their places of work in preparation for the furlough. Others worry that the absence of local police could dissuade businesses and visitors from coming to town.

And some on the outskirts who are already under the sheriff's jurisdiction are worried, too. Because of their proximity, Alto police officers were often the first responders to crime calls until county deputies arrived.

"The thought that we could be 35 or 40 minutes from getting the sheriff's deputy here, depending on where they are in the county, is scary," said Kelly Curry, manager of the Shiloh Ridge off-road vehicle park. Ms. Curry has two guns for self-defense.

Terri Underwood asks who's going to alert citizens when something goes awry in the middle of the night, like the time water began to cascade from the front door of her downtown cafe. "It could have been a lot worse had they not called me," Ms. Underwood said of the furloughed police.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304231204576405763808298714.html?mod=e2tw

What in the world...
 
sons_of_anarchy_tv_show_image_ron_perlman_02.jpg


time to take care of their own
 
xbhaskarx said:
Maybe that's not something they should publicize...

haha yeah, at least the thought that there might be cops around might help stop some crime. Now that everyone knows for sure that they aren't coming to work, there should be nothing stopping these people who would otherwise be deterred.
 
I'm guessing some petty small-time criminals might drop by to "visit" the town. Overall though I'm very curious how violent an essentially anarchy town will get. A lot of people believe police are unnecessary, it'll be nice to see it actually put to the test.
 
Holepunch said:
I'm guessing some petty small-time criminals might drop by to "visit" the town. Overall though I'm very curious how violent an essentially anarchy town will get. A lot of people believe police are unnecessary, it'll be nice to see it actually put to the test.

45 minutes tops for an officer to show up is essentially anarchy?

It´s not like this family in a constant stand-off which are living in a de facto lawless strech of land.
 
My town (1300) doesn't have a police force. The county deputes patrol it but there isn't any police force here unless they are driving through or if someone calls them. The town I grew up in didn't have any either. I can't think of any in the area under a few thousand that do. Maybe I'm missing the point?
 
Isn't the whole point of a small town having a small local police force is that they are familiar with the residents and the area or at least a major benefit when it comes to keeping the peace?

Edit: Or maybe I am completely off base here.
 
This has happened to several towns in Southwest Oklahoma. They rely on the respective county sheriff departments for law enforcement.
 
Binabik15 said:
45 minutes tops for an officer to show up is essentially anarchy?

It´s not like this family in a constant stand-off which are living in a de facto lawless strech of land.

You're a woman at home alone and you see a person creeping around outside. Would you like to wait 45 minutes for a police response?
 
CaptYamato said:
I could get into your house even if you have a dead bolt.


I guess you could break a window if you really wanted to get in. But having cops in your town isn't going to stop that.
 
The problem isn't going to be the small towns in small counties. It's going to be when you have sheriffs in bigger counties having to patrol heavily populated townships as well as small cities and maybe eventually some of the bigger cities as well. All while eating major budget cuts as people reject tax increases and in some cases reject continuing levies and other taxes that go toward funding them. The county I used to live in was faced with this very problem.
 
WickedAngel said:
You're a woman at home alone and you see a person creeping around outside. Would you like to wait 45 minutes for a police response?

A guy outside might be a threat, but that´s not anarchy. I don´t see the point of your example.
 
Deadly Cyclone said:
You'd think some of the officers would volunteer to do it for free just on the basis that shit's going to happen.

Put their lives on the line working crappy shifts for free, on top of their real job?
 
Yeah, this is a prime example of how governments seek to scare people into providing ever more dollars. Instead of realistically cutting salaries of elected officials, cutting down on excessive costs or waste (IE cops being provided with county cars to and from work, tax payer gasoline - at least in THIS county), or, I don't know, a million other things they cut primary resources in order to induce fear. Nothing new here.

But I'm not upset at all, at least it means the police won't be busy raiding American's homes for plants, seizing or otherwise extracting wealth from the local citizens through fines, or otherwise growing the security state. Good riddance to home invaders and eavesdroppers, they claim the terrorists are overseas - I make the claim they're in every neighborhood. I would LOVE for this to happen here. We have a BLOATED police force, a sheriff who moans lack of funding, but immediately therafter hires several "public courtesy officers" who don't get paid (supposedly) but are provided a tax payer funded vehicle, fuel. Now as a reminder of how our money is being squandered, we can see these cars as they sit idle during their off shift times as most of these fellows park them in their yard to make sure their social status in a small community is upheld. Let's not forget that immediately after these complaints of no funding, almost the entire fleet of police vehicles in this county was upgraded to the new (Charger style) model. Hmm.. something just doesn't add up here! #Corrupt.

I don't have a problem with real criminals - if they come here with intent to actually do harm or otherwise cause damage to person or property, there are actions we can take without the help of the policia, thanks. Not to mention by the time the police arrived the problem either will have been solved or the occupants of our home dead/already subdued. I would never call a police man (barring extreme circumstance, murder, emergency) as the first suspect is YOU and their eyes ever scanning for reasons to put you under the scrutinizing lens, ready to use the ever expanding gateway laws of probable cause. There is no shock that many communities ooze hatred for police. I respect police men who work to solve real crimes, such as theft or murder, but the drug war and the militarization of our police force (and subsequently the militarization of the tactics used to apprehend non violent Americans of all sorts) tarnishes the entire group.
 
TimeLike said:
Happened in my town too. Now we are police by the neighboring town. Probably happening all over.
Happened in my town as well (Sweden) but we're more a part of a larger town than our own town as we share the same municipality.

Which is funny because if you read the newspapers there's at least as much shit going on here as inside the city, even if we're a smaller town.
 
DownLikeBCPowder said:
But I'm not upset at all, at least it means the police won't be busy raiding American's homes for plants, seizing or otherwise extracting wealth from the local citizens through fines, or otherwise growing the security state. Good riddance to home invaders and eavesdroppers, they claim the terrorists are overseas - I make the claim they're in every neighborhood. I would LOVE for this to happen here. We have a BLOATED police force, a sheriff who moans lack of funding, but immediately therafter hires several "public courtesy officers" who don't get paid (supposedly) but are provided a tax payer funded vehicle, fuel. Now as a reminder of how our money is being squandered, we can see these cars as they sit idle during their off shift times as most of these fellows park them in their yard to make sure their social status in a small community is upheld. Let's not forget that immediately after these complaints of no funding, almost the entire fleet of police vehicles in this county was upgraded to the new (Charger style) model. Hmm.. something just doesn't add up here! #Corrupt.


local small town cops are the ones kicking down doors for marijuana?
 
Easy_D said:
Happened in my town as well (Sweden) but we're more a part of a larger town than our own town as we share the same municipality.

Which is funny because if you read the newspapers there's at least as much shit going on here as inside the city, even if we're a smaller town.


isnt sweden wealthy with a low crime rate?
 
My city doesn't have police either, and uses a nearby city. But its not because of budgeting.. we don't have enough crime to warrant a PD
3AQmK.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom