Small town is without a police force due to budget constraints

Status
Not open for further replies.
We don't have police where I live, just the county Sheriff.

And really, the focus on policing in this country is all screwed up. Instead of trying to prevent street crime, it's all about the War on Drugs and running speed traps. The police are pretty much organized crime themselves, only legal.
 
Deadly Cyclone said:
You'd think some of the officers would volunteer to do it for free just on the basis that shit's going to happen.

Do you enjoy working for free? Most sane people don't.
 
DiscoJer said:
We don't have police where I live, just the county Sheriff.

And really, the focus on policing in this country is all screwed up. Instead of trying to prevent street crime, it's all about the War on Drugs and running speed traps. The police are pretty much organized crime themselves, only legal.
Absolutely on point.

sans_pants said:
local small town cops are the ones kicking down doors for marijuana?

Most definitely they are involved and every day more localized police forces receive militarized training. Many times you will have multi-county participation in raids. No-knock raids have increased by thousands of percent in the past decades, rampant reports of the "wrong house", yet people are s till terrorized unjustly, or their dogs are shot, or their children have guns pointed at them. Worst case scenario, the police break in and immediately murder the suspect because he's carrying something that may be, or "could be" a weapon. Let's not take into account they just busted into a private house unannounced in the middle of the fucking night. Hell, at times there aren't even suspicions of a weapon. Even if there are, is it unreasonable to expect that a person would, in the dark of night hearing a loud, UNANNOUNCED and unexpected noise/infiltration grab the closest item, even if it is not traditionally a weapon (see example where police busted in, immediately murdered man with golf club)? I think not. However police are granted clearance on the grounds that the suspects represent a "reasonable" threat to them without regard of who busted into the home at an inappropriate hour (many of these non violent offenders) without any notification or announcing of the presence of law enforcement.

Even if the local sheriffs were not involved, they are the FOOT SOLDIERS in the war on drugs, which wasn't even my primary point rather a singular one of several.
 
Deadly Cyclone said:
You'd think some of the officers would volunteer to do it for free just on the basis that shit's going to happen.


And how would they feed their family or pay their bills?
 
Zzoram said:
Put their lives on the line working crappy shifts for free, on top of their real job?
A good majority of officers do because there are very few jobs available. Most officers start their career as an auxiliary(volunteer) officers because they have to, in addition to their normal full time job so they can get experience and better compete in the job market. Hell, a small town of 1200 people would most likely be dependant on volunteer officers for patrol.

I'm sure there are plenty of officers that would have continued working for free doing what they love, but if the town is unwilling to pay the bills for all the things that need maintaining to keep a department afloat, then nothing can be done.

It's sad that officers had to lose their jobs, but in all reality a town of that size is normally patrolled by the county sheriff department in most areas anyway.
 
DownLikeBCPowder said:
Most definitely they are involved and every day more localized police forces receive militarized training. Many times you will have multi-county participation in raids. No-knock raids have increased by thousands of percent in the past decades, rampant reports of the "wrong house", yet people are s till terrorized unjustly, or their dogs are shot, or their children have guns pointed at them. Worst case scenario, the police break in and immediately murder the suspect because he's carrying something that may be, or "could be" a weapon. Let's not take into account they just busted into a private house unannounced in the middle of the fucking night. Hell, at times there aren't even suspicions of a weapon. Even if there are, is it unreasonable to expect that a person would, in the dark of night hearing a loud, UNANNOUNCED and unexpected noise/infiltration grab the closest item, even if it is not traditionally a weapon (see example where police busted in, immediately murdered man with golf club)? I think not. However police are granted clearance on the grounds that the suspects represent a "reasonable" threat to them without regard of who busted into the home at an inappropriate hour (many of these non violent offenders) without any notification or announcing of the presence of law enforcement.

Even if the local sheriffs were not involved, they are the FOOT SOLDIERS in the war on drugs, which wasn't even my primary point rather a singular one of several.

Wow, major thread derail. This town can't even afford to pay their police department, how would they afford any of what you're talking about? What's the connection to this particular town?
 
SolKane said:
Wow, major thread derail. This town can't even afford to pay their police department, how would they afford any of what you're talking about? What's the connection to this particular town?

Actually, I mentioned in that post that it wasn't my primary point at all, I was just responding to him since he brought it up (er, edit: commented on) specifically. Uhm, but I disagree that it is "off topic" if discussing the police in any condition. If it is, I apologize.
 
Deadly Cyclone said:
You'd think some of the officers would volunteer to do it for free just on the basis that shit's going to happen.

I'm gonna guess they need to find jobs...
 
My guess is that some of the yahoos against this voted the very people in office who made this happen. Wake up, people. Your elected officials have been upfront with you, if nothing else. Were you too dumb to understand the consequences of tax decreases along with decreased spending? Where exactly were they supposed to cut?

You can blame the politicians only to a certain extent. They have made their intentions known since day one, and honestly, they are delivering.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom