Chairman Yang
if he talks about books, you better damn well listen
Ace Combat was always a series that fell under the radar for me (no pun intended). I heard good things about it from way back in the PS1 days but never actually tried it out.
That changed with Ace Combat 7. I bought the game, along with the bonus remaster of AC5. I started playing, was instantly smitten, and then immediately stopped playing. Why? Because when I know I'll love a series, I want to go back as far as possible and play it from the beginning. Better to go from oldest to newest rather than the other way around, right?
The PS1 games seemed too dated to me, so I skipped them. But I went on a buying spree for the series a while ago (all used and fairly cheap). AC4, Zero, 6, Assault Horizon, Assault Horizon Legacy+ (which has nothing to do with Assault Horizon and is actually a 3DS remake of AC2), and Sky Crawlers: Innocent Aces for the Wii (supposedly a good game in the same vein by the same team). I didn't get the GBA/PSP games because I don't have the systems, and I guess the free-to-play game is now completely gone?
Now I'm knee-deep in Ace Combat 04. I don't know how I would've felt on release, but playing it for the first time now, it's aged remarkably well. It's super-smooth which really helps the visuals, the controls are intuitive, and the mission design is great, with a nice mix of scripted stuff and open flexibility. I'm really enjoying the story and modern day-ish setting. As a whole, the game feels very slick, especially for something nearly 20 years old.
What are the highlights I have ahead of me? What are the low points? Am I missing anything important? Is Ace Combat really as underrated of a series as it seems to me?
That changed with Ace Combat 7. I bought the game, along with the bonus remaster of AC5. I started playing, was instantly smitten, and then immediately stopped playing. Why? Because when I know I'll love a series, I want to go back as far as possible and play it from the beginning. Better to go from oldest to newest rather than the other way around, right?
The PS1 games seemed too dated to me, so I skipped them. But I went on a buying spree for the series a while ago (all used and fairly cheap). AC4, Zero, 6, Assault Horizon, Assault Horizon Legacy+ (which has nothing to do with Assault Horizon and is actually a 3DS remake of AC2), and Sky Crawlers: Innocent Aces for the Wii (supposedly a good game in the same vein by the same team). I didn't get the GBA/PSP games because I don't have the systems, and I guess the free-to-play game is now completely gone?
Now I'm knee-deep in Ace Combat 04. I don't know how I would've felt on release, but playing it for the first time now, it's aged remarkably well. It's super-smooth which really helps the visuals, the controls are intuitive, and the mission design is great, with a nice mix of scripted stuff and open flexibility. I'm really enjoying the story and modern day-ish setting. As a whole, the game feels very slick, especially for something nearly 20 years old.
What are the highlights I have ahead of me? What are the low points? Am I missing anything important? Is Ace Combat really as underrated of a series as it seems to me?
Last edited: