trippingmartian said:This thread needs PlayStation vs iPod sales numbers. Which is the stronger brand?
Skin said:Is anyone here seriously impressed by the new Ipod video? I'm not. The screen is way too small to watch movies on it and not even widescreen. I think Nano/PSP is the best combo for me![]()
mrklaw said:no. Its a stop gap and realistically its not aimed at video nuts. Its there if you want a music ipod that does a bit of video.
The video ipod that does a bit of music is the one you'll want, and I'm sure it'll come.
The thing it does do though, is kick start the service and let Apple get the deals in place before the 'proper' ipod video drops.
I just have no idea why Apple stuck with the 4:3 aspect ratio for the video iPod. I was pretty confident that the widescreen fake that was going around the net recently was indeed a fake, but I was also convinced a video iPod would be announced, and I was expecting a similar layout to the fake. Even then, I probably would've stuck with my PSP for video playback just due to screen size, but making it 4:3 just really boggles my mind. I mean, sure, most music videos and television is currently full frame, but the major networks are now broadcasting in hi-def, as well as tons of music videos, and the trend is only going to continue rapidly.
Who cares? You don't buy a PSP for playing games anyway.AndreasNystrom said:Still.. Ipod cant play games.
I don't ? Hmmmm ...Xrenity said:Who cares? You don't buy a PSP for playing games anyway.
Usually, that's implied by the fact that they're addressing the issue at all. Companies always have to be worried about competition. Not mentioning it at all would be a better indication of not worrying about it.Blackace said:I am just curious...how many companies have had a press release to say "damn RIGHT we're worried!!!"?
Mihail said:Usually, that's implied by the fact that they're addressing the issue at all. Companies always have to be worried about competition. Not mentioning it at all would be a better indication of not worrying about it.
Chittagong said:although I believe that this will be a lot bigger hit in the living room than on the go. With a single event, Apple put in place your digital living room - down to the remote controller.
Nash said:Yeah, the new iMac and FrontRow is blatantly a move in that direction. I'm sure Airport Express with video streaming is not too far away, and that FrontRow will be supported across the range.
Probably a Mac Mini with direct TV connections as well.
Chittagong said:Yep, 499e Mac Mini with Front Row, remote, HD video support and optical audio output, and maybe a digital TV tuner - that would completely and utterly own the living room.
I'm sure you meant to put via download at the end of that first sentence, because there certainly have been at least a couple of consumer-friendly business models for video content distribution prior to what Apple is doing.Chittagong said:The point most seem to be missing is that Apple is setting up the first consumer-friendly business model for video content distribution
- simple purchasing
- content management
- DRM
- pricing and royalty structure
Success with the iPod doesn't guarantee success with their digital living room offering. Nothing's been put in place other than the announcement of a new product.With a single event, Apple put in place your digital living room - down to the remote controller.
As you yourself pointed out, the iPod with video capabilities is a very incremental step, much more so than the original iPod - i.e. the original iPod probably fulfilled more peoples' desires for music on the go right out of the gate than this new iPod does for video on the go. In a similar fashion, Sony's approach is also incremental, just from a different direction, starting with UMD video and then incrementally adding features like direct download to the PSP via the browser and streaming via their Location Free technology. Perhaps you prefer Apple's approach but there certainly seems to be evidence that many like Sony's approach so far as well, if accounts of UMD movie sales are to be believed.Sony better be very scared - and it is beyond me why they are so fucking incompetent that they haven't done a similar setup for PSP already, with MemoryStick, 16:9 screen and ownership of a huge catalog of content. Right, just let Apple become the dominant player in video like they did in audio with iTunes, idiots.
Chittagong said:Yep, 499e Mac Mini with Front Row, remote, HD video support and optical audio output, and maybe a digital TV tuner - that would completely and utterly own the living room.
Mihail said:Ponn, I don't think you get the point of the new iPod. Firstly, it's not iPod Video. It's just a new iPod with video functionality. I'm sure there will be a dedicated iPod Video player somewhere down the line.
Secondly, you made a personal decision not to "settle" for a smaller screen, but you don't represent the average consumer. Perhaps hard drive space, battery life, and durability are much more important to someone than the screen size. Who knows? I can't tell what's in people's heads. Certainly the market has shown that they don't care about minor differences in audio quality (since the iPod is outdone by many a-player) as much as they do about ease of use and content delivery.
And speaking of content delivery, this is perhaps the most dangerous thing for Sony that Apple can do. If Apple can hook people on their iTunes video products, and conceptually connect that to their hardware, UMDs are going to seem a lot less desirable.
Well... they've got a better chance than Xbox.Mrbob said:No offense, but it is going to be a long, LONG time before any Mac owns a living room.
jarrod said:Well... they've got a better chance than Xbox.![]()
Link316 said:the screen sucks but people might not care if its simpler to use, Sony better get its act together
Mrbob said:Well, neither of them will. Tivo will bitch slap them both when it comes to recording video. Apple needs to come up with a plan to stream Tivo footage to the Ipod video to watch on the go. Then maybe it'll take off.
UMD Video is still entrenched in the old world manufacturing/distribution model though, it'll peak and decline like every other physical format does. Digital's the future, optical's the past.Mrbob said:Not really. Sony is thinking broader than just watching TV shows on the PSP. They got the entire movie industry behind them now on the UMD Movie format. Plus TV compilations are starting to show up on PSP UMD Video.
Sony is the one ahead. Apple is the one playing catch up.
Plus the PSP has better screen resolution, bigger screen, and more features to boot.
Mostly due to the illogical brains of fanboys. Gotta love blind loyalty and denial!Kung Fu Jedi said:I have no idea why the iPod and PSP have to be compared at every turn.
fixed.chinch said:Mostly due to the illogical brains of Newsweek.
jarrod said:UMD Video is still entrenched in the old world manufacturing/distribution model though, it'll peak and decline like every other physical format does. Digital's the future, optical's the past.