Sony Pictures mad at Netflix’s failure to block overseas VPN users

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think the two companies need to meet halfway.

Netflix needs to accept worldwide licensing fees for all its shows, but Sony needs to lower their fees to compensate for the frustrating situation this puts Netflix in.

There won't be (with some exceptions) worldwide licensing fees. Licensing movies/TV shows to local companies/channels is too important.
 
Then it's on Sony. I find hard to understand how can Netflix actual size, directly or indirectly not be a factor to negotiations, and only the full potential market. Then Sony would get the same fee weather from Netflix or from Mom and Pop start a Streaming service.

Then it's also on Sony to re-negotiate the contract accordingly.

I'm thinking that Sony is probably more worried with what they lose from not tapping into world market asymmetries, specifically not getting a larger revenue from overseas costumers, where prices are steeper.

Sure it's on Sony to a degree, and you can bet if Netflix doesn't do anything about it, they're going to raise the rates accordingly to compensate for worldwide distribution which Netflix will either have to take and raise rates to the consumers or drop the content all together and that takes a hit on the Netflix library.

But let's not let Netflix off the hook here. They negotiated for US rights and left a back door open that they know about to let other people outside of the US to watch and aren't even making the smallest effort to stop. They reap the benefits as a result, Netflix should have some obligation to try and stop this from happening. Sony is rightfully unhappy about Netflix turning a blind eye on this while fully benefiting financially.
 
What people should understand:

Obviously this guy's beef with Netflix makes zero sense from the Sony CEO's standpoint or the customer's viewpoint.

Region locking is a side effect of inter-company political bullshit. Of course their international distribution guy is upset because he is losing out on "his" cut of the revenue / profits. He's missing out on bonuses / performance metrics / whatever that are going to other Sony executives in different branches.
 
Why does So y care if people use VapN to watch Netflix from other countries if they are paying for It? I thought they where cool with this since PS4 is region free :P
 
What people should understand:

Obviously this guy's beef with Netflix makes zero sense from the Sony CEO's standpoint or the customer's viewpoint.

Region locking is a side effect of inter-company political bullshit. Of course their international distribution guy is upset because he is losing out on "his" cut of the revenue / profits. He's missing out on bonuses / performance metrics / whatever that are going to other Sony executives in different branches.

I don't think you're reading it right. Or maybe I'm not.
Netflix doesn't pay Sony per viewer. They make a single deal per country. But people are watching it from outside the country they made a deal with Sony with. Sony made the deal for only the US.
Sony is willing to grant them rights for other countries as long as Netflix pays them more than the original deal but Netflix doesn't wish to do so.
Thus Sony is pissed.
Ultimately this should be solved by making all deals global and have them priced accordingly for Netflix, but Netflix is too big at the moment for them to have enough leverage to do so. So they're even more pissed.
Hence enters Playstation Vue.
 
There won't be (with some exceptions) worldwide licensing fees. Licensing movies/TV shows to local companies/channels is too important.

Exactly. It will take television and physical media more or less completely disappearing before such a thing becomes possible.

As a consumer, of course, I really don't care about Sony's issues, but they have plenty of reason to be pissed. Netflix is not making much of an effort to prevent people from circumventing regional restrictions. Then again, I don't know if they are even obligated to do so from a contract perspective.

This puts Sony in a really poor position with its regional partners with whom they have individual deals and will more than likely put them at a disadvantage next time they are negotiating distribution rights.

Again, as a consumer, I don't care, but Sony definitely has good cause to put pressure on Netflix.

Why does So y care if people use VapN to watch Netflix from other countries if they are paying for It? I thought they where cool with this since PS4 is region free :P

Netflix plays Sony for the rights to stream video to consumers in specific regions. They only pay for a few regions.

People pay Netflix to access their service. The service is only officially available in specific regions.

Lots of people use a VPN to gain access to the service despite it not being officially available in their region. Netflix gets paid just the same, so they're in no rush to put in measures to stop this. Sony feels like they are losing out.
 
Sure it's on Sony to a degree, and you can bet if Netflix doesn't do anything about it, they're going to raise the rates accordingly to compensate for worldwide distribution which Netflix will either have to take and raise rates to the consumers or drop the content all together and that takes a hit on the Netflix library.

But let's not let Netflix off the hook here. They negotiated for US rights and left a back door open that they know about to let other people outside of the US to watch and aren't even making the smallest effort to stop. They reap the benefits as a result, Netflix should have some obligation to try and stop this from happening. Sony is rightfully unhappy about Netflix turning a blind eye on this while fully benefiting financially.
Netflix do the bare minimum, which is region detection. That's the industry standard procedure. Hulu does the same, but even BBC iPlayer, which offers content mainly provided by BBC themselves I think, can be tricked in the same way as Hulu and Netflix.

At the end of the day, it's very hard to regionally lock anything on the internet. From Amazon to Steam, to Sony themselves, people very easily access content from all over the world. Nintendo from all companies are probably the ones who lock out content better, haha.

Sure, Netflix could lock accounts to a region forever, but that would mostly make that most people around the world would just sign up to the american Netflix and not their local Netflix service.
 
everything should be available globally for the same price. there's no moral high ground in supporting the contrary.

So you want to raise the price of content in Nigeria to be the same as the US - watching a film would cost a week's salary?

Or do US customers have to start paying a 25% premium for European sales taxes?

No other sector, anywhere for this.
 
At least I'm paying for it. Jeez.

That doesn't really matter to Sony, because you're paying Netflix, but Netflix isn't paying Sony for the distribution rights to the country where you are (assuming that you're in a country where Sony's content is not being offered through Netflix).

Sony's wording is shit in general (lol, equating it to piracy), but their reasoning is sound. Not that it really matters to customers. This is something for Sony and Netflix to duke it out.
 
That doesn't really matter to Sony, because you're paying Netflix, but Netflix isn't paying Sony for the distribution rights to the country where you are (assuming that you're in a country where Sony's content is not being offered through Netflix).

Sony's wording is shit in general (lol, equating it to piracy), but their reasoning is sound. Not that it really matters to customers. This is something for Sony and Netflix to duke it out.

It's inflammatory perhaps, but calling it piracy is perfectly accurate (assuming the language of the deal applies to physical location rather than IP addresses). What else would you call the distribution of copyrighted content that you have no rights to?
 
You give a company money (by proxy of course) and they still crack the shits. Hilarious. It's proof the war on piracy is about control and nothing else. Clearly it's not actually about money if they complain when they're getting paid.
 
You give a company money (by proxy of course) and they still crack the shits. Hilarious. It's proof the war on piracy is about control and nothing else. Clearly it's not actually about money if they complain when they're getting paid.

The party complaining is not getting paid.
 
Netflix do the bare minimum, which is region detection. That's the industry standard procedure. Hulu does the same, but even BBC iPlayer, which offers content mainly provided by BBC themselves I think, can be tricked in the same way as Hulu and Netflix.

At the end of the day, it's very hard to regionally lock anything on the internet. From Amazon to Steam, to Sony themselves, people very easily access content from all over the world. Nintendo from all companies are probably the ones who lock out content better, haha.

Sure, Netflix could lock accounts to a region forever, but that would mostly make that most people around the world would just sign up to the american Netflix and not their local Netflix service.

https://torrentfreak.com/hulu-blocks-vpn-users-over-piracy-concerns-140425/

The BBC do more too.
 
I guess Sony didn't feel that strongly, or else really did need the money since Breaking Bad is on Netflix last I checked.
 
Sony has a point here, NetFlix could easy do more by simply region locking to the subscribers billing/credit card address. Different shows need different distribution models across the world. Like Breaking Bad never had a UK deal so Netflix bought it so people could catch up then aired the final season a day after the US date. If US customers used a UK proxy they could view it without paying for cable.
 
So you want to raise the price of content in Nigeria to be the same as the US - watching a film would cost a week's salary?

Or do US customers have to start paying a 25% premium for European sales taxes?

No other sector, anywhere for this.

same content available everywhere and maybe something like a 1st world price, 2nd world price, 3rd world price, and that's all the price tiers i could tolerate.
 
same content available everywhere and maybe something like a 1st world price, 2nd world price, 3rd world price, and that's all the price tiers i could tolerate.

What happens if i'm in a 1st world region but use a vpn to create a 3rd world account though?
 
What happens if i'm in a 1st world region but use a vpn to create a 3rd world account though?

ok fine, shittier content on the 2nd and 3rd world ones.

1st world all content. 8 bucks a month

2nd/3rd world. less content. < 8 bucks a month.

better yet. just make a high tier and low tier nextflix system, both available globally. the well-off in nigeria would probably want the good stuff anyway.
 
ok fine, shittier content on the 2nd and 3rd world ones.

1st world all content. 8 bucks a month

2nd/3rd world. less content. < 8 bucks a month.

And we're right back at where we are now? You just proposed the very thing you decried a moment ago.
 
And we're right back at where we are now? You just proposed the very thing you decried a moment ago.

pssh, hardly. right now we have different prices for europe, the uk, canada, the us, aus etc. and theyre all in that 1st world catagory. im saying they should flatten it out because differentiating between those regions is pretty stupid, local laws aside.

there should be a high tier and low tier nextflix system, both available globally.
 
So instead of me paying to use a foreign Netflix to watch a show I couldn't otherwise watch, they would prefer me just torrenting it for free?

Is this the jist of their argument?
no, the reality distortion field prevents a lawyer from understanding this fact
 
pssh, hardly. right now we have different prices for europe, the uk, canada, the us, aus etc. and theyre all in that 1st world catagory. im saying they should flatten it out because differentiating between those regions is pretty stupid, local laws aside.

The reality is that they still have a lot of deals in place with companies in those countries that prevent them from doing a global license. They could change that, but they'd have to determine that it would work out better for their bottom line by doing so.
 
pssh, hardly. right now we have different prices for europe, the uk, canada, the us, aus etc. and theyre all in that 1st world catagory. im saying they should flatten it out because differentiating between those regions is pretty stupid, local laws aside.

Do you know.... there is something called tax? And government do stuff with that money...
 
Do you know.... there is something called tax? And government do stuff with that money...

i very much doubt the european prices are purely tax related. im sure a lot of the overhead on the price is due to local pricing standards. any variance in price due to laws and unavoidable stuff like taxation i understand, but that should be all there is to it. which we know isnt already the case because prices everywhere hit nice and tidy X.99 numbers.
 
basically enforcing region lock lol

Enforcing distribution rights.

Sony is typically pretty lenient on what you do with products you've bought. They still have observe local laws and deals with other companies when it comes to the distribution or sale of that product.

Comcast level of scum behavior. Fuck Sony Pictures.

What is this?

Are all of you who are shitting on Sony about this taking a second to think at all? Is your argument anything more than, "I don't care. I want mine."
 
They're missing out. Canadian Netflix has become really good over the last year. Really good for new movies. It is also the only Netflix I know of to have Fresh Prince on it.

I basically just hop between the two while looking for something to watch. One time the DNS number that was supposed to be US gave me UK Netflix, which was a fun week. Too bad I can't seem to find a replacement for that one.


Unlocator.com. Easy to switch around between all netflixes
 
Sony is absolutely in the right here. Netflix is only paying for US distribution, yet is accepting international subscription dollars. Know that if you live abroad and are using VPN to pay for US Netflix, it's not that Sony doesn't want your money - it's that Netflix doesn't want to fork it over.
 
Really, why should they care? Why should your liking of something be top priority and cause Sony to forgo their rights?
Turn that upside down. Why would he care about Sony nickel and diming their revenue streams?

He wants his. Sony wants theirs. Both can express themselves regarding this. In the end one wins.
 
I watch the US Netflix via VPN, I'm in the UK, only because they have better support for subtitles. It's ridiculous how some of the exact same shows are subtitled in the US but not in the UK. Skins (a British show) being one of many examples.
 
I actually paid for my Netflix account a smaller fee because I was paying in dollars and not swedish crowns. All because of my VPN.

Then the VPN stopped working and I stopped paying. Wasn't worth the money when there was nothing worth watching.
 
They're mad that you're paying Netflix, who in turn is only paying Sony for US distribution rights.

Sounds like they need to negotiate a day-and-date with same features contract with Netflix for worldwide distribution.

People not being able to see Breaking Bad, et. al. at the same time as the US is probably what drives people to use a VPN to get that content.
 
Turn that upside down. Why would he care about Sony nickel and diming their revenue streams?

He wants his. Sony wants theirs. Both can express themselves regarding this. In the end one wins.

Because Sony is the one who owns the content by rights and not Netflix or the customers paying Netflix for a subscription?

I don't see how they are nickel and diming anyone by trying to enforce the terms of a distribution deal.

It's like claiming that you're a legitimate paying customer when you're buying burned discs of games or copied DVDs or something.
 
The party complaining is not getting paid.

But the person not being paid in my case is the holder of Australian distribution rights. Surely Sony Pictures handles their own distribution in the US. Sounds like the Australian distributors are getting ripped off if Sony makes more money selling the rights to them than they do getting money from me directly via Netflix.
 
Sounds like they need to negotiate a day-and-date with same features contract with Netflix for worldwide distribution.

People not being able to see Breaking Bad, et. al. at the same time as the US is probably what drives people to use a VPN to get that content.

I'm sure they would love to, but why would Netflix pay for worldwide rights given the current situation?

(ignoring the other distribution deals that are probably in place)
 
They're mad that you're paying Netflix, who in turn is only paying Sony for US distribution rights.



They would prefer that Netflix pays them for worldwide rights if they are going to offer the service worldwide
This. Can't believe the ignorant and uninformed responses in this thread.

Not to mention providers who spend megabucks to buy a TV Series exclusively for their channel in a specific country, only to find people watching it on Netflix via VPN. That will then put pressure on Sony, who will in turn then have to put additional pressure on Netflix.

It's obvious why there would be so much upset.
 
But the person not being paid in my case is the holder of Australian distribution rights. Surely Sony Pictures handles their own distribution in the US. Sounds like the Australian distributors are getting ripped off if Sony makes more money selling the rights to them than they do getting money from me directly via Netflix.

Netflix is the one who gets your money.

Completely separate of your subscription payment, Netflix negotiates deals with rights holders to stream content. Obviously they have to strike a fine balance between making a profit, while charging a low enough price and having compelling enough content so people subscribe en masse. That's probably a big part of why they don't offer the service all around the world. It's likely not financially viable to buy up the rights in every region. Not only that, but certain regional deals already in place may prevent Netflix from even obtaining streaming rights to certain content in certain regions in the first place.

In your case, Australian distributors of content have every right to be pissed. They're making deals with Sony and paying accordingly so they can distribute, and presumably, make money off of that content. Netflix's widespread availability presumably hurts their ability to do this and you can be sure they're going to use this as leverage the next time they are at the negotiating table with Sony, which then cuts right into Sony's bottom line. All as a direct result of a deal in the United States with Netflix. If this happens enough, the deal with Netflix is no longer worth it and Sony just pulls out, making everyone lose out.

It's a complicated situation, but I don't see how anyone can fault Sony for acting in their own interests. They have to due their due diligence to their regional partners.

I'm sure they would love to, but why would Netflix pay for worldwide rights given the current situation?

(ignoring the other distribution deals that are probably in place)

Exactly. Netflix is enjoying a worldwide customer base (obviously not to full potential due to the VPN hoops one has to jump through) all while only paying for rights and taxes in a couple of countries.
 
You've lost me at "piracy by paying users"

If you bought copied DVDs from a guy on the street in New York or Hong Kong or wherever, would that not be piracy?

"Piracy by paying users" is what Ars Technica wrote, by the way, not Sony. Sony's accusation is that Netflix is engaging in a form of piracy.
 
When I recently discovered how easy this was, I figured content distributors would be really pissed about this. A lot of them have exclusivity deals with local VOD players so if someone from a country where such a deal is in play the local partner will be pissed because they paid for that exclusivity.

From a consumer standpoint, I'm going to act in my best interest and spoof an IP that gives me a larger catalog, but it's not hard to see why business would act in their best interests as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom