Assuming the plot is true....now that this information has been leaked, surely the perpetrators in question could just alter their plans to focus on different locations? Or just initiate the attacks earlier then intended?
First, it would be terrible for the loss of life alone. That can't be understated.
But you can just see one or both of the nominees using this to try to rile up the citizens for war support. And I have a hunch which one would do that most effectively.
Could this just be the Trump loving FBI trying to suppress voters? I'm kidding, that's some conspiracy shit.
Really though, this wouldn't even be the most surprising thing out of this election if it happens. I really hope it doesn't![]()
Are you seriously suggesting the FBI is gonna let Al Qaeda do some bombings so Trump gets elected? Are you for real?
(And that's also assuming such events would sway big enough masses, btw)
Not sure about a physical terror attack, but I do expect another big DDoS attack on Tuesday.
Why do you think this would be so unbelievable?
Not challenging you, just curious.
I don't believe it.
This is propaganda.
Worse thing is we have an FBI that might not be that enthused to look out for it
Considering telling my cousin to not send his kid to school on election day
The elementary school is connected to the middle school and it's a polling location in his city. Entirely unnecessary but still, all the same....
Considering telling my cousin to not send his kid to school on election day
The elementary school is connected to the middle school and it's a polling location in his city. Entirely unnecessary but still, all the same....
This seems like a weird thing for the US intelligence to announce. Why would they announce it and in such a vague fashion if at all?
Considering telling my cousin to not send his kid to school on election day
The elementary school is connected to the middle school and it's a polling location in his city. Entirely unnecessary but still, all the same....
Is Al Queda some ISIS spinoff group?
Our intel is a disaster. We have horrible intel. Okay? The worst intel.
Our intel is worried about Al Queda, but they won't say who's really a threat to this country, and they won't say what that threat really is. I'll tell you what it is. RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM. Okay? They won't say the words! ISIS. This Tuesday, when I become president, I will nuke ISIS within my first twenty four hours in office. Believe me. It's gonna be huge.
I thought this meant Intel the tech company and I was like uhhh
hope nothing happens and everyone is safe![]()
For a second there I actually thought you meant Intel, the processor people.
Yeah, definitely.
So did I. :/
uh... there is no school on election day lol
uh... there is no school on election day lol
uh... there is no school on election day lol
They really do want Trump.
This seems like a weird thing for the US intelligence to announce. Why would they announce it and in such a vague fashion if at all?
They think killing people will get Trump elected? Please this is the very reason to not elect Trump and his fear monger party.
I would say a devastating 9/11 like attack before an election of any kind would effect millions of millions of voters and turn out, especially the very next day. Like that timelines "day after" is election day. Thats pretty fucked up.why would they not do it on Election Day? Seems like that would create more chaos.
Was it wise to have this information leaked to the press?
Assuming the plot is true....now that this information has been leaked, surely the perpetrators in question could just alter their plans to focus on different locations? Or just initiate the attacks earlier then intended?
I can't think of a single time that one of these "possible terrorist attack planned" reports came out and then something actually happened in the US, at least. I mean, that's a good thing, but just saying.
This seems like a weird thing for the US intelligence to announce. Why would they announce it and in such a vague fashion if at all?
Killing people will definitely help Trump in this election.
In a Quinnipiac University poll last week, 49 percent of likely voters said Clinton would do a better job keeping the country safe from terrorism, while 47 percent said Trump would do a better job. And in an ABC News/Washington Post poll this month, half of registered voters said they trust Clinton more to handle terrorism, more than the 41 percent who trust Trump though that margin narrows to 48 percent for Clinton to 45 percent for Trump among likely voters.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/clinton-trump-terrorism-leaders-228376#ixzz4P3apThqv
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
I was just talking to someone on how trains here are very vulnerable. Atleast here in Chicago. Like if someone come aboard with a weapon and with enough ammo, that situation could be devastating.Wasn't there plans found in the bin laden raid about an attack on the railway system?
I thought this meant Intel the tech company and I was like uhhh