Three first stages landed in row, mighty impressive.
Three in a row on a barge, another one was on land.I thought it was 4?
Because no radar, military or civil, has caught the reentry. And those radar stations could never, ever, confirm the reentry, unless SpaceX got them on a payroll. Man, those reentries are virtually unprovable. (not directed at kendrid, just musing myself)Those video cutouts give the conspiracy theorists something to discuss.
When are they going to relaunch one of the first stages?
Damn!! Three successful barge landings already, amazing. Crazy if this would become routine so soon already for SpaceX.
When are they going to relaunch one of the first stages?
I thought it was 4?
LOL.Off centre.
Three first stages landed in row, mighty impressive.
Off centre.
Either way, very awesome stuff. Now they need to relaunch them to see what the viability of landing/reusing really is.
If they accumulate that much error during such a short reentry they will never hit Mars after a months-long flight.Off centre.
What are their plans for the first reuse flight payload - Empty? Resupply mission for ISS? Can't imagine anyone would want to risk an expensive satellite launch
What are their plans for the first reuse flight payload - Empty? Resupply mission for ISS? Can't imagine anyone would want to risk an expensive satellite launch
What are their plans for the first reuse flight payload - Empty? Resupply mission for ISS? Can't imagine anyone would want to risk an expensive satellite launch
Probably not any time soon, tests on the reused stages have supposedly shown some nasty wear.Damn!! Three successful barge landings already, amazing. Crazy if this would become routine so soon already for SpaceX.
When are they going to relaunch one of the first stages?
Wasps!
Sped-up video of the landing from first person view. Absolutely incredible, hope they release a real-time video soon
https://www.instagram.com/p/BF7sxM9QES7/?hl=en
Bummer. I won't be able to watch the launch and landing live tomorrow.
Musk has been naming the drone ships after the sentient, self-named space ships in Iain M. Banks's Culture book series.
http://www.space.com/28445-spacex-elon-musk-drone-ships-names.html
It really bother me that they have all these future technology and they can't put a high quality live camera at the corner of the drone ship.
It's amazing.....
I'm 31 years old now, there's a fucking possibility I get to go to freaking space before I die! Heck I might even get to go to another freaking planet before I pass away!
Man we live in such exciting times!
I would also definitely sign up for a space burial! Shoot me into the unknown!
I've told everyone I know I want my ashes shot into space. Best burial ever AND best chance that an alien civilization finds my ashes and resurrects me so I can live a second life on another world.
Probably not any time soon, tests on the reused stages have supposedly shown some nasty wear.
Which is... what you expect. They'll iterate on it, i imagine this one will look better, and the next better still...
Yeah.So it's possible that none of the landed rockets get reused and they need to make changes to future destiny to make them more durable? I suppose it's all valuable data - you have to land them to know if you can reuse them
On the webcast today they mentioned that the live feed from the ship has issues because of the satellite link, particularly how the link gets disrupted by the vibrations from the incoming rocket.It really bother me that they have all these future technology and they can't put a high quality live camera at the corner of the drone ship.
Probably not any time soon, tests on the reused stages have supposedly shown some nasty wear.
Shotwell said she visited the stage and was impressed with how little wear and tear it showed.
“[Y]ou pull off the cover and that wire harness is pristine,” she said. “The metal is still shiny. You pull off the thermal protection system that we have near the engine, and that engine is beautiful. It is perfectly clean.
“It was extraordinary how great it looked. In fact we didn’t refurbish it at all. We inspected it and then three days later we put it on the test stand and fired it again. The goal is not to design a vehicle that needs refurbishing. It is to design a vehicle that we can land, move back to the launch pad, and launch again. Hopefully our customers will get comfortable flying the third or fourth time.”
On the webcast today they mentioned that the live feed from the ship has issues because of the satellite link, particularly how the link gets disrupted by the vibrations from the incoming rocket.
Rocket engines are loud. Really loud, to the point that managing the acoustic energy is one of the big challenges of building large rockets. If you ever watched a space shuttle launch, the water that flooded the launch pad wasn't to protect anything from the heat of the engines, it was to dampen the sound so that the echo from the engines wouldn't destroy the vehicle
How bout a 360 degree camera you can move around?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDK5TF2BOhQ
I've told everyone I know I want my ashes shot into space. Best burial ever AND best chance that an alien civilization finds my ashes and resurrects me so I can live a second life on another world.
Amazing, I keep missing these damn things. Watch the first one I manage to catch be their first failure
Pssst, what do you take us for - idiots? Of course we know it's all fake. We just don't talk about it in here - it's bad for the role-playing.
SINGAPORE Launch-service provider SpaceX on May 30 said it would meet with insurance underwriters in the coming weeks to discuss the companys plans to certify used rocket stages as fit for reflight, a long-held SpaceX ambition as a way to reduce launch costs.
SpaceX has said it hoped that recovery, refurbishment and re-qualification of previously Falcon 9 Full Thrust rocket first stages could reduce SpaceXs already low launch costs by around 30 percent.
Addressing the CASBAA Satellite Industry Forum here, SpaceX Commercial Sales Vice President Jonathan Hofeller cautioned that any price reductions from the reuse of rocket first stages would not be known until the company has a better handle on what refurbishment costs will be.
Asked if SpaceX would be giving discounts to customers agreeing to fly with reused first stages, Hoffeler said:
I think in the long term we will be. In the short term we have to establish what it is going to take to refurbish. People have been very public about what the discounts may be in the future. But we need to get to a cadence of reflight in order to reach those objectives.
Satellite fleet operator SES of Luxembourg, which has been SpaceXs biggest commercial supporter, has publicly said it would like to be the first to launch a satellite with a reused stage but would like a 50 percent price cut in return.
SpaceX Gwynne Shotwell has said the company could reduce total launch costs by about 30 percent with a reused first stage.
More in the link.SpaceX Chief Executive and Chief Designer Elon Musk has said a first reuse could occur as early as this summer.
Hofeller did not name SES or any other customer but said a couple of different folks actually want to be first to launch with a refurbished stage. He said the inaugural mission likely would be with a commercial customer. We are targeting to do that say by the end of the year, he said.
Meeting with insurance underwriters is a necessary step in preparing the market for reusability. Most commercial satellite fleet operators insure their launches in policies that also include the satellites first year in orbit. After that, lower-cost policies are available to cover each successive year in orbit.
We are meeting with the insurance companies in the next couple of weeks to go through and make sure they understand our process for certifying these and getting them ready for flight, Hoffeler said. Ultimately we think reusability will only add to our production capacity right now. It is not a baseline but it will improve capacity and therefore drive down costs.
SpaceXs pitch to underwriters comes at a time of historic softness in the satellite insurance business. Launch insurance premiums have fallen steadily, to less than 6 percent now for both the Falcon 9 and Europes Ariane 5 rocket.
One insurer said the buyers market in insurance has led to a situation where the Falcon 9 Full Thrust vehicle, which made its first flight only last March, is now afforded about the same premium rates as Europes Ariane 5, whose design has not changed in the 16 years since the vehicles last failure.
Two Boeing-built satellites are being readied for launch at Cape Canaveral aboard a single SpaceX rocket. Both satellites are all-electric craft and will use on-board electric thrusters to reach orbit.
Eutelsat 117 West B along with its co-passenger ABS 2A are scheduled to lift-off during daylight hours at 10.30am (EDT) on June 16 from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida.
SpaceX @SpaceX 28 May 2016
Yesterday, our next rocket moved into the launch site at Cape Canaveral, FL
SpaceX @SpaceX
Rocket back at port after careful ocean transit. Leaning back due to crush core being used up in landing legs
Elon Musk ‏@elonmusk May 27
Rocket landing speed was close to design max & used up contingency crush core, hence back & forth motion. Prob ok, but some risk of tipping.
Elon Musk ‏@elonmusk May 27
Crush core is aluminum honeycomb for energy absorption in the telescoping actuator. Easy to replace (if Falcon makes it back to port).
SpaceX ‏@SpaceX
Falcon's landing leg crush core absorbs energy from impact on touchdown. Here's what it looked like on Apollo lander
Came in pretty fast at an angle.