Never understood why people like 2 more than one. Norman Osborne is a much more interesting villain, and the story is more focused in the first one. 2 is a good film, but for me its not as joyous or enjoyable as the first.
Is it weird that I find Batman Begins to be the better Batman movie over The Dark Knight, TDK is a great movie but BB is a better Batman movie
Also they're both better than SM2
A movie that can't even get it's main character "right" can never be in the running.
Is it weird that I find Batman Begins to be the better Batman movie over The Dark Knight, TDK is a great movie but BB is a better Batman movie
Also they're both better than SM2
Batman Begins was the only actual Batman movie made. TDK was a Joker movie and I dunno what Rises was except shit.
Is it weird that I find Batman Begins to be the better Batman movie over The Dark Knight, TDK is a great movie but BB is a better Batman movie
Also they're both better than SM2
Yep Civil War retroactively put all previous Spiderman movies in the bin with the 70s Captain America movies.,
I love spidey, but Civil War eclipsed it. And did a touch down dance
ASM had a decent Spidey and I liked Garfield but Maguire's Peter was a lot better. Hopefully Holland and Watts can get both right. Civil War was a good start.ASM series gets a good Spidey, but the movies got fucked studio wise. But I have to absolutely agree, Tom Holland is Peter Parker/Spider-Man. Excited more for the animated movie though.
ASM had a decent Spidey and I liked Garfield but Maguire's Peter was a lot better. Hopefully Holland and Watts can get both right. Civil War was a good start.
ASM had a decent Spidey and I liked Garfield but Maguire's Peter was a lot better. Hopefully Holland and Watts can get both right. Civil War was a good start.
Macguire was not Peter. He was a dumb loser who had super powers, the 3rd movie makes fun of him for having confidence outside the suit.
Lol none of the mcu movies are even remotely as good as Spidey 2 or the first 2 batmans in Nolan's trilogy.
Not even iron man. There's such a huge gulf in quality I think.
I don't think he was perfect, but I still preferred his Peter to Garfield's. A mixture of both would have been the ideal solution.Macguire was not Peter. He was a dumb loser who had super powers, the 3rd movie makes fun of him for having confidence outside the suit.
I don't think he was perfect, but I still preferred his Peter to Garfield's. A mixture of both would have been the ideal solution.
I think Black Panther with Ryan Coogler will be like that. Also I didn't like Guardians of the Galaxy all that much but it did feel like a James Gunn film.I wonder if we'll ever get an MCU movie on the level of Batman Begins/The Dark Knight. I want to see more auteristic superhero movies. That's why I loved the Raimi Spider-Man movies, they feel like Sam Raimi films. I guess they kinda tried with Avengers and Iron-Man 3, but Joss Whedon's not on that level and Shane Black shit the bed.
Lot of rose-tinting happens with this movie. Molina is great but the rest is pretty average to downright goofy in hindsight.
The train unmasking scene is also cheesy as hell, badly acted and cringy.
Lol none of the mcu movies are even remotely as good as Spidey 2 or the first 2 batmans in Nolan's trilogy.
Not even iron man. There's such a huge gulf in quality I think. Iron man definitely is the best to come out of marvel studios tho. The genre as a whole basically peaked in 08.
.Batman Begins
The Dark Knight
So no
I think Black Panther with Ryan Coogler will be like that. Also I didn't like Guardians of the Galaxy all that much but it did feel like a James Gunn film.
Yeah, that's how I see it at the moment as well.Here's basically my breakdown;
Tobey = Good Peter, meh Spidey
Garfield = Good Spidey, meh Peter
Holland = Good Spidey, good Peter
And screw the folks who don't like Tobey Maguire, he was a great Parker.
.
It's much better than MCU movies though.
I wonder if we'll ever get an MCU movie on the level of Batman Begins/The Dark Knight. I want to see more auteristic superhero movies. That's why I loved the Raimi Spider-Man movies, they feel like Sam Raimi films. I guess they kinda tried with Avengers and Iron-Man 3, but Joss Whedon's not on that level and Shane Black shit the bed. Everything is just filtered through the MCU filter, nothing is really allowed to stand on its own. Actually Guardians kinda broke away from it a little, and that's why it's one of the better ones.
It isn't even the best Spider-Man film.
Yeah, that's right! I dig the original film! Who wants a piece of me?!
I wonder if we'll ever get an MCU movie on the level of Batman Begins/The Dark Knight. I want to see more auteristic superhero movies. That's why I loved the Raimi Spider-Man movies, they feel like Sam Raimi films. I guess they kinda tried with Avengers and Iron-Man 3, but Joss Whedon's not on that level and Shane Black shit the bed. Everything is just filtered through the MCU filter, nothing is really allowed to stand on its own. Actually Guardians kinda broke away from it a little, and that's why it's one of the better ones.
A movie that can't even get it's main character "right" can never be in the running.
Thank you. I feel like Im the only one on GAF sometimes that doesnt like SM2.