• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Spiderman 3's Villain (Actor) Announced!

Status
Not open for further replies.

hobart

Member
I'm not a Spiderman fan... but I ran across this:

Thomas Haden Church... Spidey's Villain!

"In addition to the ongoing relationship between Peter Parker and M.J., these films are driven by the great actors who have brought our villains to life," Raimi said. "Thomas Haden Church will be a fantastic and challenging new nemesis, and we all look forward to working with him."

The filmmakers are not revealing the identity of the new villain.

Hmmmmmm...
 

DMczaf

Member
B000059XUJ.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
 
Ok, I was really confused for a while there. Anyways, THC is a good match for Carnage. What about Venom though? Venom is the best chracter in the Spiderman series, he needs to be in the 3rd one.
 
Pedigree Chum said:
Ok, I was really confused for a while there. Anyways, THC is a good match for Carnage. What about Venom though? Venom is the best chracter in the Spiderman series, he needs to be in the 3rd one.

Best? No. Most popular? Yes.
 

android

Theoretical Magician
Pedigree Chum said:
Ok, I was really confused for a while there. Anyways, THC is a good match for Carnage. What about Venom though? Venom is the best chracter in the Spiderman series, he needs to be in the 3rd one.
Sam Raimi doesn't like Venom apprently. I don't understand it. I think he will probably be Mysterio or Scorpion. He would be prefect for Carnage though. But then you need Venom.
 
android said:
Sam Raimi doesn't like Venom apprently. I don't understand it. I think he will probably be Mysterio or Scorpion. He would be prefect for Carnage though. But then you need Venom.

I love Raimi, but how could noe like Venom? Hes such an awesome character, and has an uber-cool backstory to him as well.
 

evil ways

Member
Pedigree Chum said:
I love Raimi, but how could noe like Venom? Hes such an awesome character, and has an uber-cool backstory to him as well.

I don't think he dislikes Venom, but the fact that his backstory is too complicated and far fetched for a movie.

Venom is not one of those villains that simply appeared out of nowhere, fought Spider-Man and got beat in a single issue. The story stretches from 1984 to 1988.
 
evil ways said:
I don't think he dislikes Venom, but the fact that his backstory is too complicated and far fetched for a movie.

Venom is not one of those villains that simply appeared out of nowhere, fought Spider-Man and got beat in a single issue. The story stretches from 1984 to 1988.

That's true, but I still want to see Venom on the big screen. Even if its only for a few seconds.
 

Willco

Hollywood Square
Raimi doesn't like Venom because Venom is an overrated piece of Gen X XTREME AWESOME CHARACTER trash.

It's going to be Hobgoblin, Mysterio or the rumored Sandman. Dunno which one, yet.
 

SpeedingUptoStop

will totally Facebook friend you! *giggle* *LOL*
Sandman would not be a bad idea. And trying to put carnage in 3 would require a 4 hour epic or a terribly plot hole ridden plot. carnage and Venom are badass, and the story's basically set up for them to appear, but it would require 2 movies. I'm pretty sure 3 will end with a cliffhanger of sorts, like 2, except
instead of the green goblin suit and stuff with Harry, they'll have Venom appear, in some form.
One of the sub plots could develop around him. sandman does sound like a good villain to have though, not somebody like Mysterio
 
Raimi doesn't like Venom because Venom is an overrated piece of Gen X XTREME AWESOME CHARACTER trash.

It's going to be Hobgoblin, Mysterio or the rumored Sandman.
Great, so instead of HARDCORE XTREME BADASS, we could be stuck with HARDCORE GIMMICK LAMEASS!
 

Bog

Junior Ace
Strange choice. This might be the first Spiderman movie I give a shit about. Kick some ass, Lowell.
 

Willco

Hollywood Square
Iamthegamer said:
Sandman would not be a bad idea. And trying to put carnage in 3 would require a 4 hour epic or a terribly plot hole ridden plot. carnage and Venom are badass, and the story's basically set up for them to appear, but it would require 2 movies. I'm pretty sure 3 will end with a cliffhanger of sorts, like 2, except
instead of the green goblin suit and stuff with Harry, they'll have Venom appear, in some form.
One of the sub plots could develop around him. sandman does sound like a good villain to have though, not somebody like Mysterio

I'm afraid there will be no more cliffhangers. This is the last Raimi/Maguire/Dunst film and as so, Sony has told him to go ahead as if this was the last Spider-Man film. I doubt it will be, but it'll probably be the last one for awhile.
 

Cafeman

Member
Why is Thomas Haden Church a good, or bad, choice? I vaguely remember him from Wings. Is he a good choice? If so why? Has he been in other recent films?
 

Axsider

Banned
Willco said:
Raimi doesn't like Venom because Venom is an overrated piece of Gen X XTREME AWESOME CHARACTER trash.

It's going to be Hobgoblin, Mysterio or the rumored Sandman. Dunno which one, yet.
So funny! Remember son! :lol A few months ago. It was the first thread about Spiderman 3 here and I said "Damn, I think AND I hope Mysterio will be the new villain"!
And you said "nooooo, Mysterio sucks. Daredevil kicked his ass. And Mysterio went to kick Daredevils ass because he had no chance against Spiderman bla bla bla"

And now :lol
Like I said "I think AND hope Mysterio will be the villain in Spiderman 3"
The Mysterio-charakter would be perfect for a movie!
 

Shinobi

Member
DMczaf said:

:lol :lol :lol












Willco said:
Raimi doesn't like Venom because Venom is an overrated piece of Gen X XTREME AWESOME CHARACTER trash.

It's going to be Hobgoblin, Mysterio or the rumored Sandman. Dunno which one, yet.

All of whom suck SHIT next to Venom (even if he is overrated). Carnage is completely and utterly pointless, not to mention redundant. Then again, so is Hobgoblin (unless that's who Harry becomes).
 

Hitman

Edmonton's milkshake attracts no boys.
I think Sandman would be the coolest character... Also they need a cameo by Rhyno
 

hobart

Member
I was having a bad night :/

I also ran a search under: Thomas Haden Church (correct spelling of his name)... which is why I didn't see the other thread.

My bad folks!

And yes... that was the worst spelling of Spiderman... ever. Uh. :D
 

aparisi2274

Member
Dont know how credible this is, but I saw it on imdb.com under the news section:

Church To Play Venom in 'Spider-Man 3'?


Sideways star Thomas Haden Church's villainous alter-ego in the new Spider-Man movie has been revealed, if internet gossip is to be believed. The Oscar nominee will play Venom in Spider-Man 3 in 2007, according to the Pressconnects.Com website. Venom won't be the only Spider-Man arch-enemy in the second sequel - Daniel Gillies' John Jameson character will become Manwolf in the film, according to the reports.
 

SickBoy

Member
When Marvel realized the value of Venom, they ruined the character.... he had maybe two or three worthwhile arcs in Spider-Man.

I think sticking to the original Venom story might be OK (with some tweaks of course, to gloss over that Secret Wars stuff), but I'm not thrilled with the idea of Venom being the next villain for Spidey when there are so many others out there...

Besides, Thomas Haden Church can't play Venom... R.C. Everbeck has already played the role of Eddie Brock ;)

But if Batman can tap Ra's Al Ghul, I'm going to go out with the slightly-out there suggestion that the new Spider-Man villain will be Kraven :)
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
I'm not sure how anyone can believe this Venom and Man-Wolf thing. You're going to have those two villains and Harry Osborne? Harry's got to be either a second Green Goblin or the Hobgoblin if they feel the need to differentiate more, otherwise the last two films are building to nothing. The original report seems mighty shady, so I wouldn't buy it.

*sigh* This is the only fun part of the Spider-Man films for me; the speculation. The films suck, but damn would I love to see the characters brought to life by some capable people.
 
It's really easy to predict. It's gotta be the Sandman. Seriously, except for Venom (which has a boring long story), what other villains would look good on film? Doc Ock and Green Goblin were easy. Now, man-wolf? Vulture? Electro? Mysterio? Those would all look incredibly gay. Sandman brings great possibilities visually. Scorpion might not be too bad, but I'm not so sure. Sandman it is.
 
I'm gonna go with the lizard. He fits the villians of the first two.Scientist turns himself into goblin, scientist turns himself into octopus, scientist turns himself into lizard.( I know dr. connors was in the second one, so no need to point out that flaw in my theory) :)
 

SKluck

Banned
Yeah I'm getting a serious Sandman vibe from this. I don't know why, Church just looks like a good Sandman.
 
SKluck said:
Yeah I'm getting a serious Sandman vibe from this. I don't know why, Church just looks like a good Sandman.

I seem to remember reading an interview with Tobey Macguire in which he said sandman would be a visually cool villian to do. Maybe it will be true?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom