• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Star Wars The Force Awakens Trailer

Status
Not open for further replies.
The guard would actually protect the user from quick attacks at the wrist.

And me thinking the nitpicking of the guard is stupid is not an insult to anyones person. But it appears you are just trying to nitpick now, yourself.

How dare you nitpick my nitpick. Only an imbecile would deign to do such a thing.

But really, it's stupid to call people stupid for not liking something from an aesthetic or design perspective. These are subjective impressions and plenty of people have echoed the reaction that at the very least from a visual perspective, the guard looks dumb. And if it did manage to block an attack to the wrist, the saber itself would still not be protected and extremely vulnerable. An actual real life guard doesn't have that vulnerability, which is why real life guards are functional and this is not. Using it as you would a real guard would put your saber at unnecessary risk. You never want your opponents saber anywhere near your hilt and the design of the guard doesn't do anything to mitigate that.
 
As I thought, you're a pathetic shitposter, contributing nothing to the discussion. Wonderful.

Carry on.

I would presume that just because the emperor dies, the command structure of the entire empire doesn't disintegrate. Major parts would, but some would be left. In the Expanded Universe (now not-canon though), the Empire remains in some form for quite some time. I'm sure they'll have an excellent explanation for it existing 30 years later.

Okay that makes sense. Just seemed weird we were still doing the empire vs. rebel alliance thing.

Dat x wing shot looks dope though. Hoping for lots of low altitude dogfights.
 
I don't have any problem with the trailer, but I honestly think the first footage of this film should have started with something other than some black guy looking like he has to take an emergency dump.
 
you people still on the sword? Geez.

Anyway, are these remaining storm troopers or some new empire I wonder.
Empire is still a major presence by all indications.

I don't have any problem with the trailer, but I honestly think the first footage of this film should have started with something other than some black guy looking like he has to take an emergency dump.
Did you just call the male lead of the movie "some black guy"?
 
Okay that makes sense. Just seemed weird we were still doing the empire vs. rebel alliance thing.

Dat x wing shot looks dope though. Hoping for lots of low altitude dogfights.

For all we know the Rebel Alliance is the new "empire" and the Stormtroopers are the rebel-like faction.
 
imQuARdnR1Txh.gif


If you watch this part in a big 1080p res, you can see that he is looking/has his head down as he pulls out the saber. The way it is shot sort of seems to me that he doesn't see anything so much as he probably senses someone/something off screen and stops to defend himself/get ready for shit to go down.


Is it possible that their is a figure in the far distance between the two trees on the right side?

It seems to make a movement before the lightsaber is ignited but that is probably caused by the camera movement.

It is probably a tree but I can't see the top.

EDIT: SAW THE TREE ON IGN REWIND THEATER.

I thought there may have been another figure one of the left as well but I think its just another tree.
 
Can't wait for the movie, but not super knowledgeable about the films. Can someone tell me how we transitioned from Clones to non-clone storm troopers?
 
Okay, then second problem. I don't get the impression from the first few seconds that this person is the male lead of the movie.

And don't act like I should know that already.
 
Okay that makes sense. Just seemed weird we were still doing the empire vs. rebel alliance thing.

Dat x wing shot looks dope though. Hoping for lots of low altitude dogfights.
The thing that should mollify any concerns about this being a retread of old battlelines is that this is indeed 30 years later. We don't know who are really the "bad guys" now. We don't know what the power balance is. We don't know anything about the world setup. I think it should be pretty interesting, but I'm also familiar with the EU, so the idea isn't too outlandish for me. Hopefully the trailer doesn't seem like a mere retread to other people!
Comments like that are just awful. Did people call luke "some white guy" when they first saw him?
I think some of you are being unfair. Did Luke only appear in the first teasers for 3 seconds with a constipated look on his face? None of the characters in fact scream "lead!" because they're featured for mere seconds.
 
Can't wait for the movie, but not super knowledgeable about the films. Can someone tell me how we transitioned from Clones to non-clone storm troopers?

The clone troopers were created as a secret army. Once the trade federation was demolished, they transitioned to normal transcripted soldiers.
 
I get why the guard is there for the saber. Wouldn't want to end up with your hand chopped off. But answer me this. Why is there still an empire? I thought that it was gone with the emperor dead and all. Disclaimer: I know nothing about star wars outside the 6 movies already released.

did killing Bin Laden end the war on Terror?
would the Third Reich have dissolved if they had assassinated Hitler in 1942?

you kill off one Leader, a new one steps in.

there might be power struggles - if there's no clear successor to the emperor - but that still won't mean there won't be anyone
* using TIE fighters
* wearing storm trooper uniforms.
* using E 11 (like) blaster rifles

(which are the only facts we got. "empire" wasn't uttered a single time)
 
Probably old, but I think that cloaked person in the trailer don't want this happen to him/her/whatever.

EverlastingFelineGrayfox.gif

NxBGlLU.png


Light saber handles being cut is not anything new in the franchise....

If you want to put logic in lightsabers you are going to have bigger problems than this Longsword lightsaber =P
 
Okay, then second problem. I don't get the impression from the first few seconds that this person is the male lead of the movie.

And don't act like I should know that already.
Not knowing he is the lead isn't an excuse for calling him "some black guy". Comments like that are uncalled for. Do you see daisy Ridley as some white girl?
 
As I thought, you're a pathetic shitposter, contributing nothing to the discussion. Wonderful.

Carry on.

Obviously I hit a sore spot, because never once did I attack or insult your person. Calm your tits. I don't agree with you. Move on.


How dare you nitpick my nitpick. Only an imbecile would deign to do such a thing.

But really, it's stupid to call people stupid for not liking something from an aesthetic or design perspective. These are subjective impressions and plenty of people have echoed the reaction that at the very least from a visual perspective, the guard looks dumb. And if it did manage to block an attack to the wrist, the saber itself would still not be protected and extremely vulnerable. An actual real life guard doesn't have that vulnerability, which is why real life guards are functional and this is not. Using it as you would a real guard would put your saber at unnecessary risk. You never want your opponents saber anywhere near your hilt and the design of the guard doesn't do anything to mitigate that.

I didn't call anyone stupid. I also don't agree that it looks dumb. Some of us thinks it looks cool. But I understand your argument.
 
The fact that the handle guard COULD protect the user from loosing his/her hand, I can definitely see Abrams/Kasdan having a line like:
"I see you lost your hand BOY"

There were also rumors about the opening shot involving
a severed hand holding a lightsaber floating in space
, so that sword design COULD make sense in if they want it to be more than form over function
 
Not knowing he is the lead isn't an excuse for calling him "some black guy". Comments like that are uncalled for. Do you see daisy Ridley as some white girl?

Explain to me how it's not called for. I made a statement in regard to the teaser trailer. You're going to have to elaborate on why my comment, beyond just being misinformed was inappropriate.

Go ahead.
 
That'd be very cool if they were dependent on a military commander of some sort and not just another sith lord/emperor.

given the fact that Palpatine and Vader were seemingly the only remaining Sith.
(which i assume due to the fact that Order 66 was meant to eridicate all Jedi Knights; and with the Sith being notoriously backstabby he'd mostl likely have gotten rid of any Force user who might have ever endangered his position of power)
- it's highly unlikely that the remnants of the Empire are controlled by yet another Sith Lord.
 
Would a paler skin color help in that regard?

Another choice of uniform or clothing would probably help, to be honest. He doesn't look like the lead of the film.

He looks like someone who just discovered a problem and is reporting it to someone else.
 
Okay, then second problem. I don't get the impression from the first few seconds that this person is the male lead of the movie.

And don't act like I should know that already.

I don't understand. Why would the first few seconds of a huge billion dollar franchise sequel focus it's first few seconds on the first introduced character on someone who is not an important part of the film?

Seriously, if he was white, would you be making that statement?
 
The fact that the handle guard COULD protect the user from loosing his/her hand, I can definitely see Abrams/Kasdan having a line like:
"I see you lost your hand BOY"

i agree with this. Seeing as how people pretend any opponent could just easily target that one inch portion of the hilt, i am wondering, how any of the Jedis would still have hands after one fight.

If you see the blade moving to the (maybe) vulnerable part of your crossguard, you move the sword accordingly to make the crossguard blades deflect.
 
Explain to me how it's not called for. I made a statement in regard to the teaser trailer. You're going to have to elaborate on why my comment, beyond just being misinformed was inappropriate.

Go ahead.

It's a "teaser". It's not supposed to answer any questions or describe plot or outline the major players. It's supposed to incite a person to think about the movie and elicit excitement.

You decided to attach the character's race as a negative descriptor. I think that's pretty rude.
 
Explain to me how it's not called for. I made a statement in regard to the teaser trailer. You're going to have to elaborate on why my comment, beyond just being misinformed was inappropriate.

Go ahead.

Okay:

The manner in which you phrased your concern about how the trailer began inherently devalues black people. You may not have realized that's what you did, but the sentence

"I honestly think the first footage of this film should have started with something other than some black guy looking like he has to take an emergency dump."

Very strongly suggests that what's really inappropriate here is a) the first face you see is a black one, and such a decision is unworthy considering how momentous the occassion is and b) when that black face appears panicked, you automatically don't take it seriously, to the point where you immediately suggest the panic he's feeling must be intestinal.

Everyone in this trailer looks some manner of panicked/hurried. Does Daisy Ridley look like she's biking her way towards an emergency shit? Is Oscar Isaac racing across the water to find a portapotty? Maybe Joe Soccerball needs to expel some hydraulic fluids?

You could have applied that joke to anything else in the trailer, but you didn't. Why? Because you automatically value the importance of robots and white people more than you do black people.

That's how your single sentence read.
 
i agree with this. Seeing as how people pretend any opponent could just easily target that one inch portion of the hilt, i am wondering, how any of the Jedis would still have hands after one fight.

If you see the blade moving to the (maybe) vulnerable part of your crossguard, you move the sword accordingly to make the crossguard blades deflect.

Yeah. I think in a movie universe where both the protagonist (Luke) and the antagonist (Vader) have lost their hands in lightsaber combat, and with the rumored opening shot consisting of a
severed hand holding a lightsaber
, having an ancient Sith broad sword that doesn't have that weakness seems like it could fit in really well.
Maybe it even uses a very rare special crystal that shoots light to all 3 sides.
This all depends on IF Kasdan and Abrams want to have it be more than just form over function, but it could definitely make 100% sense.
 
Well, I think a lot of you are misunderstanding my intent. I don't have any problem with the first person in the trailer being black, or the lead being black, or even the entire cast being black.

There was an important black character in the original trilogy,and I think there should be more black characters in this new set of movies.

My comment merely addressed the "awakening" as an event of consequence. You see a familiar and classic Star Wars scene, and a man looks terrified. This event lacks some impact because leads of films generally don't lose their composure until you know something about who they are. He therefore doesn't strike me as the lead.

I know some of you are fresh from some other thread, but lay off. You know how to interpret someone's intent, and you know I wasn't being racist, nor have I ever been racist.

Some white dude, some Hispanic dude, whatever. I made no derogatory comment about his place in the film or his skin color, just how the few seconds made me feel.
 
The fact that the handle guard COULD protect the user from loosing his/her hand, I can definitely see Abrams/Kasdan having a line like:
"I see you lost your hand BOY"

There were also rumors about the opening shot involving
a severed hand holding a lightsaber floating in space
, so that sword design COULD make sense in if they want it to be more than form over function

Isn't like having the hilt would have helped them much in the situations they both (Luke and Anakin) got their hands maimed.

tumblr_m0u6gig6wR1rqbv05o2_r3_500.gif


tumblr_m0u6gig6wR1rqbv05o1_500.gif
 
You know how to interpret someone's intent, and you know I wasn't being racist, nor have I ever been racist.

I don't know any of that shit. I don't know who you are, I don't even know your real name.

You asked, I answered. That's how your shit came across.

"Some black guy" is inherently demeaning. It sounds like suggesting it's automatically a mistake that he be the first thing you see, that he's not important enough to be the first thing you see, and that his expression is one that automatically weighs less than everyone else's in the trailer.

The problem isn't that we suck at misinterpreting intent. The problem is that you didn't communicate your actual intent with any amount of care, and instead communicated a feeling you don't want out there.
 
My comment merely addressed the "awakening" as an event of consequence. You see a familiar and classic Star Wars scene, and a man looks terrified. This event lacks some impact because leads of films generally don't lose their composure until you know something about who they are. He therefore doesn't strike me as the lead.
Impact? Dude is scared maskless in the middle of nowhere. How is that not impact or raise any questions?
 
Okay, then second problem. I don't get the impression from the first few seconds that this person is the male lead of the movie.

And don't act like I should know that already.

Context, dude. He's the first character in the first shot of the first teaser. You don't spend that kind of PR real estate on some random.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom