Mafia Films
Neo Member
has this SF V been confirmed yet, or is it fake?
I still had the feeling its a next gen SFIV, or some fan made hoax.
I still had the feeling its a next gen SFIV, or some fan made hoax.
That wasn't the subject of Bish's challenge for me.
3 thru 7 look like context to me. Could go either way, IMO. I have no stake in this game but I wouldn't have picked those, myself.Okay, here we go. Incoming.
EXAMPLE 1:
ROTR Thread:
SF5 Thread:
EXAMPLE 2:
ROTR Thread:
SF5 Thread:
EXAMPLE 3:
ROTR Thread:
SF5 Thread:
EXAMPLE 4:
ROTR Thread:
SF5 Thread:
EXAMPLE 5:
ROTR Thread:
SF5 Thread:
EXAMPLE 6: (kind of works...)
ROTR Thread:
SF5 Thread:
EXAMPLE 7:
ROTR Thread:
SF5 Thread:
EXAMPLE 8:
The best one of them all, IMO. The OP of the SF5 thread themselves:
ROTR Thread:
My eyes and fingers hurt now...
He wanted examples of hypocrisy. It's in the post you quoted.Which were the main points the people bish quoted were making. The posters he quoted were saying that people's biases were showing and bish wanted proof. people provided proof. what fucking point are you trying to make?
Lots of people understand exclusivity deals are a bit poo, no matter which side gets them because when they are successful they perpetuate the culture of moneyhatting instead of sponsoring the creation of new stuff.
It's not a precedent - it's been going on for years and Microsoft are at least as bad.
It won't go away as long as we keep buying the games.
it's just important to keep perspective.
Yes, it sucks when you lose content or even a game you were interested in but acting like you are some precious victim and pretending it's much worse for your chosen console than the 'other side' is just silly.
Of course it is. People knew more about the TR situation - enough to be annoyed by it - than they do about the SF situation.
That wasn't the subject of Bish's challenge for me.
Is this what happens when all we hear from Xbox people for 2 months is competition is good?
I hate exclusive deals like this, but oh well I love Street Fighter.
He wanted examples of hypocrisy. It's in the post you quoted.
Has this SF V been confirmed yet, or is it fake?
I still had the feeling its a next gen SFIV, or some fan made hoax.
Maybe it's exclusive to Japan.
Maybe.
The likelihood that Capcom was planning SF5 for PS4 and Xbox One is stronger than the likelihood that it was going to be a PS4 exclusive from the very beginning.
So the two situations are similar except for the official announcement.
That wasn't the subject of Bish's challenge for me.
Which you have not even remotely fulfilled. Being outraged at a TR exclusivity and then being excited about a SF announcement is not hypocrisy. Maybe you'd have a case if the excitement was about the exclusivity itself, but none were. Heck, one even denounces the fact.
TR was announced for all platforms. Two months later it was suddenly XB1 exclusive, and both SE and MS were very, very hazy and reticent about explaining the exclusivity deal.
SF hasn't been announced yet.
And yet you're trying to compare and contrast people's attitudes. Doesn't work.
I disagree but I also don't care to continue to discuss that specific point with you. As I said in my previous post I don't see how you proved statements being made.Read the posts he quoted. So did he ask for something the posters weren't talking about? I assumed he wanted proof of what the posters were saying, which he got.
But that wasn't what was requested by bish. He asked for evidence of statements such as "i was just scanning the tomb raider thread earlier and checking post history of anyone who got upset and they posted here all excited."
Nothing for example Man-is-Obsolete posted is even remotely evidence for such a statement.
You both don't get it.
It's more about the tone of the two articles.
In the Tomb Raider thread there was all this negativity surrounding Square and Microsoft because of the moneyhat.
In this thread, there's much much less negativity surrounding Sony and Capcom because of the moneyhat.
So while all of the examples I provided may not be textbook hypocrisy, they are examples that demonstrate the abrupt change in tone for a similar occurrence.
Look, I provided examples to the best of my ability in order to avoid a ban. If Bish feels that my examples do not satisfy that requirement, then I will man up and accept my punishment for my original comment.
No young Skywalker, it is you who are mistaken about a great many things.
Most of the examples are not only 'not textbook hypocrisy', they are simply not hypocrisy full stop.
In fact it's quite possible to be able to generally disapprove of exclusivity deals, be angry about TR being exclusive and be still happy that SF is coming to PS4 without being internally inconsistent at all.
If you can't see that then you aren't concentrating hard enough.
I disagree but I also don't care to continue to discuss that specific point with you. As I said in my previous post I don't see how you proved statements being made.
See:
TR was announced for all platforms. Two months later it was suddenly XB1 exclusive, and both SE and MS were very, very hazy and reticent about explaining the exclusivity deal.
SF hasn't been announced yet.
And yet you're trying to compare and contrast people's attitudes. Doesn't work.
There is no real defense for what it looks like this exclusivity deal is. If your literally paying to keep a game that was already in development off of another platform, that's an issue.
TBF, TR wasn't announced for any platforms other than Xbone. According to Kagari though, it was in fact multiplat at the time of the initial announcement
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=140949415&postcount=7537
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't a significant portion of the outrage in that thread over the vague wording of the exclusivity.
Agree to disagree.
There is no real defense for what it looks like this exclusivity deal is. If your literally paying to keep a game that was already in development off of another platform, that's an issue.
Point out how and I'll show you where you're going wrong.
I'm not interested in arguing with someone who insists they are right and then tries to teach other people to think like they think.
I rather prefer intelligent discourse.
I'm not interested in arguing with someone who insists they are right and then tries to teach other people to think like they think.
I rather prefer intelligent discourse.
It's definitely confirmed.
Highly doubt that Capcom will ignore the huge install base of 14+ million owners worldwide.
Okay, here we go. Incoming.
This is like some hostage standoff where we all lose. XBox is holding Tomb Raider and PS4 is holding Street Fighter.
Fucking truce man. Everybody just walk away with your weapons down. Let us all enjoy our classic video games. These are titles not to be fucked with or to be made exclusive even timed. These are IPs that belong to all of us no matter what console you own.
I know as a PS4 and Wii U owner that I am really upset about the Tomb Raider deal. I don't play Street Fighter so I don't care it is coming to PS4. I do care that people that love the franchise on XBox are getting hosed.
None of this is necessary.
where has it been def confirmed?
I just spoke with a friend who works over at Capcom US and it's for sure a console exclusive on PS4. Not coming to Xbox One.
If a mod wants to PM me I can confirm with them whatever info they want.
Sure, we can agree with that. However, there's no indication that this scenario accurately represents SF5. It's just as likely, in fact more likely when considering the circumstantial evidence, that this is a repeat of DR3 in the sense that it may not have happened now or at all without this deal.
Save your rage for when we actually know enough to be certain that anger is the right response.
-sigh- Calming down somewhat.
Thinking back on it. I do remember a little while back someone at Capcom(might have been Ono, not sure) officially stating that SF5 would not be seen for many years because they didn't have the resources or okays within the company. Maybe Sony did kickstart it somehow. So maybe it isnt similar to the TR situation.
I don't know. I just hope they are up front and transparent about the situation when it is officially announced.
I just spoke with a friend who works over at Capcom US and it's for sure a console exclusive on PS4. Not coming to Xbox One.
If a mod wants to PM me I can confirm with them whatever info they want.
Permanent.
Who knows about future "Ultra Turbo EX Whatever" editions, if such future editions ever exist, but this initial release is just PS4.
OK, we're good. Carry on!
-sigh- Calming down somewhat.
Thinking back on it. I do remember a little while back someone at Capcom(might have been Ono, not sure) officially stating that SF5 would not be seen for many years because they didn't have the resources or okays within the company. Maybe Sony did kickstart it somehow. So maybe it isnt similar to the TR situation.
I don't know. I just hope they are up front and transparent about the situation when it is officially announced.
"I don't have R&D budget and staff."
my god capcom is insane, what a strange move alienating their own fan base this way