LegendOfKage
Member
It's especially interesting how studios aren't talking about this publicly.
Last edited:
What are you talking about? Acolyte only flopped because of some incels. That’s what I read on the internet /sApparently the failure of The Acolyte may have influenced this.
Good point. Aside from that, I edited my last point to explore what a win-win scenario regarding the groundbreaking concept of checking with fans could look like. If you don't agree with it, feel free to remove your reaction accordingly.Hopefully, they’re not solely using focus groups from people living in L.A. That’s gonna skew things dramatically in the studios favor. Talk people in smaller towns in middle of nowhere USA or U.K. to get true representation.
It's so boring and I mean that for both sides. I look at star wars as an example and see that the fan base was traditionally straight males. Instead of doing what you suggested kain, the studio seems to actively attack their fan base and antagonise them, lumping all the fans together and telling them they are toxic. Sure some of them are but now you've alienated older fans.Apparently the failure of The Acolyte may have influenced this.
[edit]
I don't get why more producers don't just ask fans "We want to add more diversity to this project, so how could we do that in a way that will feel natural and won't go against established lore? What established female characters, or minority characters, or groups can you think of from this work of fiction that we can work with? What would you suggest?"
Then just take those characters or write some new ones, and you have your diversity. That doesn't seem like it would be that hard. People hated the Witcher on Netflix because they ignored the storyline and the lore of the books. But I think they could have absolutely added more diversity to The Witcher without breaking the lore, race swapping the characters, or rewriting the story. They could have really expanded on the story and characters in some cool ways without doing any of that, and without writing new storylines that completely go against character motivations and values.
But instead they ruined the show, and blamed racists and sexists like they always do.
People hated the Witcher on Netflix because they ignored the storyline and the lore of the books. But I think they could have absolutely added more diversity to The Witcher without breaking the lore, race swapping the characters, or rewriting the story. They could have really expanded on the story and characters in some cool ways without doing any of that, and without writing new storylines that completely go against character motivations and values.
Perhaps turning Luke into a hermit loser who gave up and walked out on his friends and family, was not a good idea.
Talk about impostering. Kid's just learning world history.
The Witcher world, thrown together from various groups snatched from their original locations by the confluence, was the one that could MOST tolerate ethnic diversity, but when its shared across the elves, humans, and dwarves it blurs the lines between species as well. Rings of Power suffers from this. Wheel of TIME REALLY suffered from the loss of place like you mentioned though, DESTROYED that show because the post apocalyptic nature of it wasn't used to good effect.The forced inclusivity/diversity diversity was one of the worst things about the Witcher TV series. The fantasy world of the Witcher is based on medieval central Europe and very, very heavily influenced by the fairy tales, legends and myths of Slavic Eastern Europe. That's what gave the books and in particular the games so memorable, simply because they weren't based on Scandinavian/Germanic or Greek/Roman mythology like so many other fantasy series. The US/UK creators of the TV series completely disregarded that important aspect of the books/games, for them it was just generic fantasy hogwash they could mold as they wish.
By making everything diverse, the world of the Witcher completely lost its sense of location. The story doesn't take place in a fantasy, pseudo medieval version of Poland, but in a generic fantasy setting where every location looks the same, where geographical distance doesn't exist and where even the most remote villages at the edge of the world has a diverse population with European whites, Arabs, Indians, Asians, blacks and other ethnicities.
This is going to backfire and is not needed
Fanbases aren't a monolith and can't be universally pleased. This becomes more true the bigger the fanbase is.
Theres always gonna be something people are whining about, and there always has been, well before the so called "dei" era so many here, for the large dedicated fanbases. Trying to pander to them is a futility because there's no one thing that will make everyone happy, and this compromises on the artists intent and pushed these closer to being products than actual projects.
Im in the same fanabses as many individuals that I think are idiots and who I vehemently disagree with on about everything. The chances you'd please us both is already slim.
That was actually one of the few ideas from Lucas' original plans.Perhaps turning Luke into a hermit loser who gave up and walked out on his friends and family, was not a good idea.
Luke flaking out and running away isn't inherently a bad idea. Its how he OVERCOMES his failures and returns to WRECK SHIT that would have made that turn a cinematic masterpiece. Instead of limping around and ending like a wet fart, Luke could have come back and tossed those knuckle dragging AT-ATs around like toys and in general just went out like a boss. Finally succumbed to his dark side but using for a good purpose.That was actually one of the few ideas from Lucas' original plans.
I would have liked The Last Jedi a lot more ifLuke flaking out and running away isn't inherently a bad idea. Its how he OVERCOMES his failures and returns to WRECK SHIT that would have made that turn a cinematic masterpiece. Instead of limping around and ending like a wet fart, Luke could have come back and tossed those knuckle dragging AT-ATs around like toys and in general just went out like a boss. Finally succumbed to his dark side but using for a good purpose.
I really don't think you need to spoiler that bitI would have liked The Last Jedi a lot more ifLuke had lived. I was very excited during the final but then he just died.
That was actually one of the few ideas from Lucas' original plans.
Apparently the failure of The Acolyte may have influenced this.
[edit]
I don't get why more producers don't just ask fans "We want to add more diversity to this project, so how could we do that in a way that will feel natural and won't go against established lore? What established female characters, or minority characters, or groups can you think of from this work of fiction that we can work with? What would you suggest?"
Then just take those characters or write some new ones, and you have your diversity. That doesn't seem like it would be that hard. People hated the Witcher on Netflix because they ignored the storyline and the lore of the books. But I think they could have absolutely added more diversity to The Witcher without breaking the lore, race swapping the characters, or rewriting the story. They could have really expanded on the story and characters in some cool ways without doing any of that, and without writing new storylines that completely go against character motivations and values.
But instead they ruined the show, and blamed racists and sexists like they always do.
Your post is 2 years too late as it’s not that simple anymore, and for proof of this go to the Ghost of Yotei thread in the gaming section.I feel like it should be a simple solution. Don’t make shit, or try to push agendas.
I honestly don't have too much of a problem with diversity, a series as big as the Witcher had to be diverse as you want to appeal to as broad an audience as possible not to mention it's netflix FFS, pretty sure their employees have pronouns on their signatures, hell this new Harry Potter TV show will obviously be more diverse than the movies and I as a massive fan with 2 kids who are massive fans won't have a problem if they recast Hermione as a POC as again it gives it a wider appeal and would be a natural fit, what I do find issue is when they go full swing in the other direction as they did with the Acolyte where they just threw in every tick box DEI shite they could find.The forced inclusivity/diversity diversity was one of the worst things about the Witcher TV series. The fantasy world of the Witcher is based on medieval central Europe and very, very heavily influenced by the fairy tales, legends and myths of Slavic Eastern Europe. That's what gave the books and in particular the games so memorable, simply because they weren't based on Scandinavian/Germanic or Greek/Roman mythology like so many other fantasy series. The US/UK creators of the TV series completely disregarded that important aspect of the books/games, for them it was just generic fantasy hogwash they could mold as they wish.
By making everything diverse, the world of the Witcher completely lost its sense of location. The story doesn't take place in a fantasy, pseudo medieval version of Poland, but in a generic fantasy setting where every location looks the same, where geographical distance doesn't exist and where even the most remote villages at the edge of the world has a diverse population with European whites, Arabs, Indians, Asians, blacks and other ethnicities.
We’re in the pre-judging era because these entertainment entities focused on pushing bullshit identity politics and forced token DEI bullshit over delivering quality entertainment.Your post is 2 years too late as it’s not that simple anymore, and for proof of this go to the Ghost of Yotei thread in the gaming section.
We are in the pre-judging era of entertainment.