• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

[T-Pain's Twitter] Number of streams an artists needs to make $1, by platform

Con_Z_ǝdʇ

Live from NeoGAF, it's Friday Night!
But streaming is the future we all want...
i-dont-im-not.gif
 

MacReady13

Member
How am I supposed to find out that I love it?
You know about radios? They tend to play artists music. Same with music video channels. That's how we used to do it when we weren't sure of things we might like or not. It may be a foreign concept to some but it wasn't that long ago we did stuff like this...
 

poppabk

Cheeks Spread for Digital Only Future
You know about radios? They tend to play artists music. Same with music video channels. That's how we used to do it when we weren't sure of things we might like or not. It may be a foreign concept to some but it wasn't that long ago we did stuff like this...
The radio that pays 17 cents per 100 plays to 1000's of people and which plays the same 5 artists over and over again?
 

Con_Z_ǝdʇ

Live from NeoGAF, it's Friday Night!
Reprated and regular listening where?
See for example the post directly above you. In addition most online outlets let you pre listen the music. Bandcamp lets you listen to the whole album repeatedly. Don't pretend that streaming music through the likes of Spotify an co. is the only way to hear new music.
 

AV

We ain't outta here in ten minutes, we won't need no rocket to fly through space
Repeated and regular listening is a first indication.

And how do I access the music in the first place?

You know about radios? They tend to play artists music. Same with music video channels. That's how we used to do it when we weren't sure of things we might like or not. It may be a foreign concept to some but it wasn't that long ago we did stuff like this...

I'm not old enough that I didn't grow up with cassette tapes, real MTV and eventually a CD Walkman, but something being "the way we used to do things" doesn't make it better. Those things suck, it's the 21st century.

The point is that streaming platforms are a far, far better method of discovering new music legally than anything we've had before. "If you love someone's music, go buy it" is no good without a platform to hear the music first, so your options are:

A. Listen to the radio so you hear the artist's 1/2 singles and nothing else at the discretion of a bad DJ
B. Listen on Youtube/Bandcamp/other free services where artists don't make a dime
C. Pirate the music so the artists don't make a dime
D. Listen on streaming platforms where at least they get something if I don't end up loving them and going further

The lament over paid streaming services is just absurd, it's the best thing to have happened to music (for listeners), period, no matter how much artists might cry about money they were never going to make in the first place. Fans will buy merch and go to your shows if the music is good enough.
 

Con_Z_ǝdʇ

Live from NeoGAF, it's Friday Night!
And how do I access the music in the first place?

I'm not old enough that I didn't grow up with cassette tapes, real MTV and eventually a CD Walkman, but something being "the way we used to do things" doesn't make it better. Those things suck, it's the 21st century.

The point is that streaming platforms are a far, far better method of discovering new music legally than anything we've had before. "If you love someone's music, go buy it" is no good without a platform to hear the music first, so your options are:

A. Listen to the radio so you hear the artist's 1/2 singles and nothing else at the discretion of a bad DJ
B. Listen on Youtube/Bandcamp/other free services where artists don't make a dime
C. Pirate the music so the artists don't make a dime
D. Listen on streaming platforms where at least they get something if I don't end up loving them and going further

The lament over paid streaming services is just absurd, it's the best thing to have happened to music (for listeners), period, no matter how much artists might cry about money they were never going to make in the first place. Fans will buy merch and go to your shows if the music is good enough.
The majority of people who buy into streaming services won't pay additional money to buy an album on physical media or let alone a digital copy. Why would they since they think they already paid for the "music". It is a very convenient way of discovering music and a good thing for consumers, yes. But this is just one side of the coin.
 
Last edited:

Paasei

Member
So, in his situation with 10mil listeners a month on Spotify alone, that amounts to more than 25K a month considering all of those only stream 1 song? Or is my math so wrong that I’m not seeing the issue?

Reminds me of that South Park episode Faith+1 and MOOP.
 
Last edited:

AV

We ain't outta here in ten minutes, we won't need no rocket to fly through space
The majority of people who buy into streaming services won't pay additional money to buy an album on physical media or let alone a digital copy. Why would they since they think they already paid for the "music". It is a very convenient way of discovering music and a good thing for consumers, yes. But this is just one side of the coin.

Sure, but the amount people are willing to spend on music in that way isn't going to change either. In a world where we still had to rely on the radio or other incredibly limiting sources of music, how many CDs a year are those people realistically going to buy anyway? The idea of paying the same amount of money for one artist's CD when that money could fund a month of unlimited access to thousands of other artists just isn't smart or sustainable.

For a long time artists have made the bulk of their cash from merch and tours, that hasn't changed - but now with streaming services, I can listen to all kinds of stuff at the click of a button - which has been possible for a long time, the only difference is at least now they're getting paid something for my clicks rather than me leeching off a P2P client or Youtube. There's no scenario in which it's not better overall for everyone involved.
 

Roxkis_ii

Banned
I think artists should be thankful for streaming services. Their getting more money from people like me then before steaming services were out and about.

Ask me how many Mp3 have I ever bought lol.


tenor.gif
 

Tams

Member
Correct.

But what if you are unable to perform live because of a global pandemic? Maybe you are lucky and already made millions or at least enough to sustain a live without an income for a month or a year. These platforms are tailored to not support the artist the slightest. At least 50% of the revenues should be given to the artist because in the end he is responsible for the music. Sadly it has never been this way but with streaming services it is getting worse.
Because their music alone before I listen to it is next to worthless to me. And even after I've listened to it, it's still next to worthless. Often it's just a distraction or accompaniment; I often don't care who it's by or even what genre it is as long as it isn't bad.

If I didn't have a music streaming subscription (as was the case before streaming was a thing*) I would (and did) just listen to the musicians I like again and again, occasionally adding something from either hearing it on the radio or through word of mouth. Before they were getting absolutely nothing from me. Now they get an miniscule amount, but at least get some exposure and the slightly higher chance I'll buy an album or something from them.

*which I still do when swimming as I don't have access to audio streaming then.
 
Last edited:
As an artist and musician who releases music, it's almost criminal what Streaming platforms pay and get away with paying those that aren't propped up by major labels et al.

Bandcamp is something casual listeners of music will probably never bother with, as an example.
 

teezzy

Banned
yes, the media industries are all evolving. gaming is finally getting there as well - thank god

if artists don't like it they should find other pursuits

lord forbid they had to work a 9 to 5 like the rest of us

Personally i work 8 to 6 and just barely make a modest living

Stfu T-Pain
 
S

SpongebobSquaredance

Unconfirmed Member
yes, the media industries are all evolving. gaming is finally getting there as well - thank god

if artists don't like it they should find other pursuits

lord forbid they had to work a 9 to 5 like the rest of us

Personally i work 8 to 6 and just barely make a modest living

Stfu T-Pain
well there are artists with crazy work ethics, but I also think that too much "regulations" could lead to music that may be entertaining, but ultimately boring, generic and devoid of artistic integrity. its not like you can just turn on a switch and you make a good music.
 

Susurrus

Member
You know about radios? They tend to play artists music. Same with music video channels. That's how we used to do it when we weren't sure of things we might like or not. It may be a foreign concept to some but it wasn't that long ago we did stuff like this...

Except that's a terrible solution because they play the same 6 "popular" songs over and over. Of course they're popular, that's all you play. Who decides it is popular? Shit is getting released daily from many amazing but lesser known artists, but we're stuck w/ the same limited songs month after month after month. Even when they play a song I enjoy, they play it way too much and I get sick of it long before it goes off the air. And I have a 5-10 minute commute (which is why I don't bother putting my own stuff on, by the time I set it up I'd be almost there) and this STILL happens. Radio is trash.
 

MrFunSocks

Banned
This tweet reminds me of the big marketing push when Tidal was first released as a platform. Completely tone deaf if they think that I give a shit about what a millionaire makes per stream. For the little guys, yes, streaming is an awful avenue for revenue. That's why they're out hustling, doing shows, touring, selling merch. That's the way it's always been. It's not like streaming is robbing these artists of something they had before, it's a new revenue stream.
Yep, streaming is amazing for smaller artists because it actually gets their music out there.
 

natjjohn

Member
sucks for the little guy, but would imagine the big guys are banking. For example, the chain smokers appear to have made about 7 million from their Closer song alone just from Spotify.
 
Last edited:

element

Member
It is pretty funny when I would tell people that Napster provided the highest payout rates of all platforms. As well that Napster is actually just Rhapsody, using the Napster brand name after they bought it from Best Buy.

Knowing these rates that why prior to COVID I would attend a lot of show and try to buy some type of merchandise directly from the artist, as that money goes directly to them or helps offset the cost of the tour (which more artists are having to self fund now).
 

Tams

Member
The majority of people who buy into streaming services won't pay additional money to buy an album on physical media or let alone a digital copy. Why would they since they think they already paid for the "music". It is a very convenient way of discovering music and a good thing for consumers, yes. But this is just one side of the coin.
And? All that says is that they don't value music much at all. And that's fine.

If they've been brought up properly, they'd know that their music streaming subscription is not making the artists much money and they'll buy merch or concert tickets for the artists they like. If they haven't been brought up properly, then there's little hope that they're going to change.

You don't have the right for people to like your music. It's not a right that if you try and be a musician as a career that you must be able to live off it.
 
Top Bottom