WASHINGTON As hundreds of commuters emerged from Amtrak and commuter trains at Union Station on a recent morning, an armed squad of men and women dressed in bulletproof vests made their way through the crowds.
The squad was not with the Washington police department or Amtraks police force, but was one of the Transportation Security Administrations Visible Intermodal Prevention and Response squads VIPR teams for short assigned to perform random security sweeps to prevent terrorist attacks at transportation hubs across the United States.
The T.S.A., huh, said Donald Neubauer of Greenville, Ohio, as he walked past the squad. I thought they were just at the airports.
With little fanfare, the agency best known for airport screenings has vastly expanded its reach to sporting events, music festivals, rodeos, highway weigh stations and train terminals. Not everyone is happy.
T.S.A. and local law enforcement officials say the teams are a critical component of the nations counterterrorism efforts, but some members of Congress, auditors at the Department of Homeland Security and civil liberties groups are sounding alarms. The teams are also raising hackles among passengers who call them unnecessary and intrusive.
Our mandate is to provide security and counterterrorism operations for all high-risk transportation targets, not just airports and aviation, said John S. Pistole, the administrator of the agency. The VIPR teams are a big part of that.
Some in Congress, however, say the T.S.A. has not demonstrated that the teams are effective. Auditors at the Department of Homeland Security are asking questions about whether the teams are properly trained and deployed based on actual security threats.
Civil liberties groups say that the VIPR teams have little to do with the agencys original mission to provide security screenings at airports and that in some cases their actions amount to warrantless searches in violation of constitutional protections.
The problem with T.S.A. stopping and searching people in public places outside the airport is that there are no real legal standards, or probable cause, said Khaliah Barnes, administrative law counsel at the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington. Its something that is easily abused because the reason that they are conducting the stops is shrouded in secrecy.
T.S.A. officials respond that the random searches are special needs or administrative searches that are exempt from probable cause because they further the governments need to prevent terrorist attacks.
Created in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, the T.S.A. has grown to an agency of 56,000 people at 450 American airports. The VIPR teams were started in 2005, in part as a reaction to the Madrid train bombing in 2004 that killed 191 people.
The program now has a $100 million annual budget and is growing rapidly, increasing to several hundred people and 37 teams last year, up from 10 teams in 2008. T.S.A. records show that the teams ran more than 8,800 unannounced checkpoints and search operations with local law enforcement outside of airports last year, including those at the Indianapolis 500 and the Democratic and Republican national political conventions.
The teams, which are typically composed of federal air marshals, explosives experts and baggage inspectors, move through crowds with bomb-sniffing dogs, randomly stop passengers and ask security questions. There is usually a specially trained undercover plainclothes member who monitors crowds for suspicious behavior, said Kimberly F. Thompson, a T.S.A. spokeswoman. Some team members are former members of the military and police forces.
T.S.A. officials would not say if the VIPR teams had ever foiled a terrorist plot or thwarted any major threat to public safety, saying the information is classified. But they argue that the random searches and presence of armed officers serve as a deterrent that bolsters the public confidence.
Security experts give the agency high marks for creating the VIPR teams. They introduce an unexpected element into situations where a terrorist might be planning an attack, said Rafi Ron, the former chief of security for Ben-Gurion International Airport in Israel, who is now a transportation security consultant.
Local law enforcement officials also welcome the teams.
The squad was not with the Washington police department or Amtraks police force, but was one of the Transportation Security Administrations Visible Intermodal Prevention and Response squads VIPR teams for short assigned to perform random security sweeps to prevent terrorist attacks at transportation hubs across the United States.
The T.S.A., huh, said Donald Neubauer of Greenville, Ohio, as he walked past the squad. I thought they were just at the airports.
With little fanfare, the agency best known for airport screenings has vastly expanded its reach to sporting events, music festivals, rodeos, highway weigh stations and train terminals. Not everyone is happy.
T.S.A. and local law enforcement officials say the teams are a critical component of the nations counterterrorism efforts, but some members of Congress, auditors at the Department of Homeland Security and civil liberties groups are sounding alarms. The teams are also raising hackles among passengers who call them unnecessary and intrusive.
Our mandate is to provide security and counterterrorism operations for all high-risk transportation targets, not just airports and aviation, said John S. Pistole, the administrator of the agency. The VIPR teams are a big part of that.
Some in Congress, however, say the T.S.A. has not demonstrated that the teams are effective. Auditors at the Department of Homeland Security are asking questions about whether the teams are properly trained and deployed based on actual security threats.
Civil liberties groups say that the VIPR teams have little to do with the agencys original mission to provide security screenings at airports and that in some cases their actions amount to warrantless searches in violation of constitutional protections.
The problem with T.S.A. stopping and searching people in public places outside the airport is that there are no real legal standards, or probable cause, said Khaliah Barnes, administrative law counsel at the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington. Its something that is easily abused because the reason that they are conducting the stops is shrouded in secrecy.
T.S.A. officials respond that the random searches are special needs or administrative searches that are exempt from probable cause because they further the governments need to prevent terrorist attacks.
Created in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, the T.S.A. has grown to an agency of 56,000 people at 450 American airports. The VIPR teams were started in 2005, in part as a reaction to the Madrid train bombing in 2004 that killed 191 people.
The program now has a $100 million annual budget and is growing rapidly, increasing to several hundred people and 37 teams last year, up from 10 teams in 2008. T.S.A. records show that the teams ran more than 8,800 unannounced checkpoints and search operations with local law enforcement outside of airports last year, including those at the Indianapolis 500 and the Democratic and Republican national political conventions.
The teams, which are typically composed of federal air marshals, explosives experts and baggage inspectors, move through crowds with bomb-sniffing dogs, randomly stop passengers and ask security questions. There is usually a specially trained undercover plainclothes member who monitors crowds for suspicious behavior, said Kimberly F. Thompson, a T.S.A. spokeswoman. Some team members are former members of the military and police forces.
T.S.A. officials would not say if the VIPR teams had ever foiled a terrorist plot or thwarted any major threat to public safety, saying the information is classified. But they argue that the random searches and presence of armed officers serve as a deterrent that bolsters the public confidence.
Security experts give the agency high marks for creating the VIPR teams. They introduce an unexpected element into situations where a terrorist might be planning an attack, said Rafi Ron, the former chief of security for Ben-Gurion International Airport in Israel, who is now a transportation security consultant.
Local law enforcement officials also welcome the teams.
Source: The New York Times
