• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Test drove MR2 Spyder and tC today...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pimpwerx

Member
I'm in the market for a Spyder or a WRX. Decided to hit the Toy dealer today since the lady on the phone told me there was only one Spyder left on the lot. Ugh, what a shame. It had the 6-speed SMT (sequential-manual tranny). I didn't quite like the tranny (and the price was all wrong), so I told the dude to call me when they get a used 5-speed in instead. He wouldn't let me go without driving the tC. Now, I'd read a bit on it, and I'm looking for a car I can race, and FWD is almost out of the question. But I went along once I saw the features on the car. Pretty cool product IMO.

2004 MR2 Spyder:

Appearance - Black on black Spyder. Looked gorgeous, but I prefer the green still. Lower to the ground that I realised. Very good thing IMO. :) The 03-04 front bumper and rear headlights look lame IMO. The car is definitely small all around, and I didn't even bother popping the front bonnet since I could just tell that the tiny pouch of a trunk wasn't worth looking at. Inside, the car is above average. Leather on this car, but I can imagine the cloth being more practical for the Miami heat. The tach-centric dash is what I want, and I could easily keep an eye on redline as I was gunning it around the backroads. Rear visibility is below average, but I don't plan on being passed much. The stereo seemed a couple notches about crap though. I've been spoiled by my Crystal comps. :D

Ride - The car is quite a bit of fun. I'll get the bad out of the way. The SMT is an awesome tranny, but it caught me out a bit, and I refuse to get it. For one, it'll take a little time to get the hang of. You've gotta keep track of your gear on the dash, especially on downshifts...which are fast and perfect. :) After a while you can probably do it by feel. But then, on upshifts, this thing is annoyingly slow. You grab a gear, and what feels like too long later, the computer upshifts to a nice bump. Not smooth, but not fast. The worst of both worlds. Just plain clumsy, and seems to be a safety measure built-in by Toyota, not a limitation. But the downshifts are just so smooth and so quick. Damn you Toyota. :( The steering wheel has shift buttons. One on the back for upshifts, and the front for downs. I'd prefer to have a left/right setup, but the buttons are fine, and give you that F1 feel. The car handles quite well, as a mid-engine car should. Turn-in was fucking insane. I felt like a pro. I couldn't induce oversteer, but the dealer who rode along with me had never driven in the car before and looked scared. The first thing I did when leaving the lot was floor it. :D The SMT won't let you spin the wheels unless you abuse it (the tranny that is), so I didn't bother trying burnouts. The car is underpowered, especially at low revs. Once you hit lift though, the pep is there. It's plenty fast, and that low, it feels like a real race car. In corners, there's some body roll, although that will be fixed with coilovers. :D It's not much though, and this car will corner with the best of them. I did as much as I could for a residential neighborhood. I wish I could have hit the highway and some on/off ramps. The ride was "bumpy", but I don't see any problem with it at all. I expect to be riding around much stiffer than that when I mod it. The brakes...fuggedaboudit. This car stops on a dime. You cannot find better brakes anywhere for less than $40,000. Your eyes will fly out of their sockets...literally. ;) But the car is underpowered.

I'm gonna get this car. I think the test drive today confirmed it for me. If it was a 5-speed, I could have really torn ass around the neighborhood. But much of the time was spent getting used to the SMT, which is a neat device that has been limited by Toyota's lawsuit-warey suits. This car needs a serious kick in the ass though. If it had the Celica engine from the start, people wouldn't even care about the Elise. This car is the shit. Ugh, so tossable. :) This is what driving's about.

2005 Scion tC:

Appearance - OK...this car is hot. I'm not even gonna pretend. I couldn't hide the grin when the dealer popped the moonroof. This moonroof design will be copied soon, if this isn't a copy already. On a bright day like today, it was awesome to get the feeling of the outdoors while driving. There moonroof is two parts. The read seats have a small one that doesn't open, and the front seats have the sliding one. They stretch the width of the roof. Fucking sweet. and there's a built-in wind deflector that pops up when the roof is open and and is flush when not. The trunk is a hatchback, but I didn't really know it until he popped it. Looked like a normal trunk to be before that. It's got a lot of room in back, and the seats fold down. It's a 2-door 4-seater and the seats in the back have an amazing amount of leg room. More than a Civic and Impreza, but looked like less than my 4-door Corolla. The coolest thing is the back seats recline. And you can fold the front seats flat and sit in the reclined rear seats like a lawnchair. HOT, baby! HOT! The dash looks cool, the seating position is great, and...he could have sold me this car today if it wasn't FWD. Which I kept telling him, but he still insisted on making me drive it.

Performance - 2.4 VVT-i engine. This shit got some pep. 160hp and 160lb/ft gave it some giddyup. I drove an automatic (meh, first one we saw) and again, put the pedal to the firewall right off the lot. The damn thing could outrun the Spyder SMT. Probably not the 5-speed, but it would be close. I'm almost embarassed to say that. This thing is 800lbs heaver, and a measely 21hp extra felt like heaven and earth. Of course, this might have to do with those 160lb/ft of torque coming in at 4k. I assume the torque curve is fairly flat for this engine. It felt it except at low rpms. The brakes are something else too. I didn't beat on them, but when I called, they answered. Pretty good stoppers, but might be average by today's standards for all I know. My 95 Rolla is almost through a second set of rotors, so anything feels good right now. The car handled well enough. Body roll was more than the Spyder, but great compared to other cars its size. 17" wheels come stock, so that's also got something to do with the ride being more solid. I really just wish I had gotten to drive a 5-speed version now, b/c I think it could have been a lot of fun. But FWD is played out. I need RWD or AWD. If I wanted to race a FWD Toyota, I'd just mod my Corolla. ;)

In any case. At a base price of $17k, you get a car that not only performs well, but also has all sorts of interior room and cool features. And the engine bay is big, so I can imagine dropping a Camry V6 or bigger in there with ease. Toyota/Scion seems to be pushing this as their big sports coupe. Supposedly, a supercharger is coming, or is available, and probably easy to turbocharge this thing. That engine's gotta have some real potential. I was looking at it and while the dealer kept spewing the info he'd learned at the training seminar, all I could do was think about fitting it in the back of the Spyder. ;) Might need a new intake manifold for that...I don't know. It doesn't look much bigger than the 1.8L, so I might just have to read up more on it. Anyone in the market should probably check this car out. Yotas last forever. PEACE.
 

miyuru

Member
Yeah I'm stupid, but I keep hearing about the Scion TC, but I've never seen one. Not in America I guess? Sounds like something in Europe. And it's a Toyota, under a diff. name..?

>>Confused<<

Edit: Oh, awesome writeup btw :D
 

Agent Dormer

Dirty Drinking Smoker
That tC is the first Scion car that I've actually really thought to be cool. It lacks that box style that made the other cars they've developed look awful.
 

fart

Savant
i think they're saying ~200hp w/ the factory supercharger. no cost yet.

scion is a region-specific (mostly metro areas + most of CA) toyo brand. stripped down econos based on the echo platform (don't know what the tC is based on - probably corolla) with "no-hassle" pricing
 

Pimpwerx

Member
Alpha: The tC just hit shores this Summer I think. The xA and xB looks like xASS. ;) The tC should have been their first outing here. This car has a lot of things I want to see in other cars. The moonroof for one, and just the way it's so roomy inside is cool as hell. And reclining rear seats are the new hot thing I think. So damn cool. I wanted to chill in the car a bit longer, but knew I had no intention of buying it. Another cool thing is the radio LCD that you can change the colors on. And it has a flip-down cover that closes over the double-DIN radio. Overkill, and will probably never be used (like drive doors on a PC case), but it will at least make thieves have to guess what you've got before they break in. PEACE.
 

golem

Member
tc01.jpg
 

miyuru

Member
Thanks alpha.

Anyway this car has some great ideas - I'm digging that lawnchair shit ^_^

But yeah, I'll keep saving for my IS :)
 

AlphaSnake

...and that, kids, was the first time I sucked a dick for crack
Pimpwerx said:
Alpha: The tC just hit shores this Summer I think. The xA and xB looks like xASS. ;) The tC should have been their first outing here. This car has a lot of things I want to see in other cars. The moonroof for one, and just the way it's so roomy inside is cool as hell. And reclining rear seats are the new hot thing I think. So damn cool. I wanted to chill in the car a bit longer, but knew I had no intention of buying it. Another cool thing is the radio LCD that you can change the colors on. And it has a flip-down cover that closes over the double-DIN radio. Overkill, and will probably never be used (like drive doors on a PC case), but it will at least make thieves have to guess what you've got before they break in. PEACE.

Yeah I know that the tC just hit. But, of course, we should all know that the tA and tB are actually nearly 2 years old (they've been out in Japan for nearly that time), AFAIK. I'm curious about the factory supercharged version...I really...really don't like the Toyota brand, and the whole Scion thing even less (I find it incredibly gimmicky), but I'll give it some thought and see how well it compares to the WRX.
 
the tC is the first scion I find attractive..

my buddy was looking at one and talked to a scion dealer.. apparently the xA's they cant give away.. the xB's sell decent, but the tC is flying off the shelves as soon as they can get them so far.

the xA is so bland it cant suck ass if it tried..

the xB just sucks ass.. it would be better off being bland.
 

Defensor

Mistaken iRobbery!
I still think the MRS spyder looks like a frog :/
Toyota should go back to their older MR2 design. Here's my 92 MR2 Turbo:
mr2.jpg

^hell ya!
 

Scoobert

Member
I'm curious about the factory supercharged version...I really...really don't like the Toyota brand, and the whole Scion thing even less (I find it incredibly gimmicky),

With the optional TRD kit it's about 200hp. Expect more great TRD offering for the entire Scion line. And what's wrong with Toyota? Didn't it just make #1 in reliability? I think so. Also how is Scion gimmicky? Toyota is trying to go after a different market without hurting the Toyota name(just in case it bombed). The tC ends up killing the Celica GTS and for $8k less.

In that other thread I said to check out the tC, you would fall in love. I was right. :D Overall it's a really nice package, it's hard to pass it up. Although dump the tires, they are RE92's. Once you get rid of those the car will handle and brake even better. That's the cars only minus. Can't have it all though, right? :)
 

retardboy

Member
But they aren't under the same category.
Toyota is NOT number 1. I am fully aware that Lexus is owned by Toyota. Just like Infiniti and Nissan are not put together.


JD Power Rankings
Brand Problems/100 vehicles

Lexus 162

Buick 187

Infiniti 189

Lincoln 194

Cadillac 196

Honda 209

Acura 212

Toyota 216

Mercury 224

Porsche 240

Chevrolet 262

GMC 262

BMW 264

Saab 265

Ford 276

Nissan 280

Chrysler 285

Mazda 285

Subaru 288

Plymouth 289

Audi 295

Pontiac 297

Dodge 298

Jaguar 310

Jeep 314

Oldsmobile 314

Mercedes-Benz 327

Mitsubishi 327

Volvo 346

Suzuki 365

Hyundai 375

Volkswagen 386

Isuzu 393

Daewoo 411

Kia 432

Land Rover 472
Saturn 267
 

AlphaSnake

...and that, kids, was the first time I sucked a dick for crack
Scoobert: Toyota's have never appealed to me. They all have very boring designs and more than underwhelming engines. And the Scions are just such cheesy looking (and marketed) vehicles. I think the name makes up for half of the cheese. If I ever got a Scion, I'd debadge the car first thing.
 

Scoobert

Member
Either way, your numbers and my numbers mean nothing. The numbers go by ANY complain. It doesn't matter if it's major or minor. They really don't prove a whole lot, until JD Power starts distinguishing between major and minor claims.
 

AlphaSnake

...and that, kids, was the first time I sucked a dick for crack
What's great about that list is that you just know at least 100 of Subaru's complaints came from ricers who burned their car from heavy usage. Hehehe.
 

EviLore

Expansive Ellipses
Staff Member
AlphaSnake said:
What's great about that list is that you just know at least 100 of Subaru's complaints came from ricers who burned their car from heavy usage. Hehehe.


alert.jpg
 

AlphaSnake

...and that, kids, was the first time I sucked a dick for crack
EviLore said:

Hahaha, oh come! As if it's not true?

Edit: Ok, fine. That and the fact that they've been using the same transmissions for the past...12 years?
 

Scoobert

Member
Well, Subaru has been in the Top 5 for years in other countries. If anyone makes a warranty claim, it goes into those numbers. Or if someone even has a small complaint. It really could be anything or nothing at all. That's why those numbers don't mean much.
 

AlphaSnake

...and that, kids, was the first time I sucked a dick for crack
Scoobert said:
Well, Subaru has been in the Top 5 for years in other countries. If anyone makes a warranty claim, it goes into those numbers. Or if someone even has a small complaint. It really could be anything or nothing at all. That's why those numbers don't mean much.

Hehe, but I still can't help but shake the feeling that they can be much higher up on that list though.
 

scribb1er

Member
Quick question, how does one even compare a mid engine, rear wheel drive, 140hp NA, 2 seat convertible to an awd, 230hp turbo, 4 door sedan?

First thing I would change is Mr2 to S2000. Yes, the S2000 is $5000 more brand new, but you can easily get a used 2002 with 15,000 miles for less than a brand new Mr2. The S2000 is easily better than the Mr2 in every single category.

Though, in the end, my view would be the most skewed (since all compairsons would be based off a modified WRX).
blue.jpg
 

AlphaSnake

...and that, kids, was the first time I sucked a dick for crack
Yeah, seriously. I really have a low opinion on the MR2s. Underwheling car for an overwhelming price. The S2000 is awesome, but I'd so much rather get a 350z or G35x.
 

fart

Savant
scribb1er said:
Quick question, how does one even compare a mid engine, rear wheel drive, 140hp NA, 2 seat convertible to an awd, 230hp turbo, 4 door sedan?

First thing I would change is Mr2 to S2000. Yes, the S2000 is $5000 more brand new, but you can easily get a used 2002 with 15,000 miles for less than a brand new Mr2. The S2000 is easily better than the Mr2 in every single category.

Though, in the end, my view would be the most skewed (since all compairsons would be based off a modified WRX).
blue.jpg
he's not looking for a new mr2. he's looking for a used one. you can't pick up an s2000 for his price range.

he wants power but he also wants the kind of tossability that you only get with these tiny, light, RWD cars. the "comparison" isn't between the cars in an objective sense (they're quite different obviously) but in where his priorities lie and thusly which car he would prefer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom