excelsiorlef
Member
In the aftermath of a car accident in 2014, Denee Booker was told by her doctor that the child she was carrying had died in utero.
To avoid complications, she agreed with her doctors suggestion to remove the fetus instead of waiting for it to naturally pass, Booker told state health officials during a Thursday hearing on a proposed state rule that would require the cremation or burial of fetal remains.
That I would have had to take or make either of those decisions is mind-boggling and terrifying, Booker said of the proposed requirements. I cant imagine how much worse that wouldve made my situation.
Booker was among dozens who testified on a pending rule change that prohibits hospitals, abortion clinics and other health care facilities from disposing of fetal remains in sanitary landfills, instead allowing only cremation or interment of all remains regardless of the period of gestation even in instances of miscarriages.
...
With little notice and no announcement, the proposed change was published in the Texas Register on July 1. In a fundraising email sent to supporters last month, Abbott said the rules were proposed because he didn't believe fetal remains should be "treated like medical waste and disposed of in landfills."
...
That prompted outrage from the reproductive rights community, which accused state leaders of placing unnecessary regulations on abortion providers. Medical professionals also raised concerns about who would bear the costs associated with cremation or interment a figure that can reach several thousand dollars in each case and why the rule change does not allow an exception for miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies.
During the hearing, opponents of the change reiterated those concerns which were mentioned by the Texas Medical Association and the Texas Hospital Association in a joint letter to state health officials and questioned if women who miscarry at home would be required to carry the fetal tissue or bloody products of a miscarriage to a doctors office or hospital.
Responding to those concerns, John Seago with the anti-abortion group Texas Right to Life suggested that the health department should clarify the rules so they do not apply to miscarriages that occur at home.
Medical professionals and others have also questioned whether the new rules would trigger a requirement for death certificates so that fetal remains could be cremated or buried.
Under current rules, the state requires funeral directors or a person acting as such who take custody of a dead body or fetus to obtain an electronic report of death before transporting the body, according to the associations letter.
The Funeral Consumers Alliance of Texas came out against the measure. Sarah Reeves, a representative for the group, testified that the states fiscal analysis of the rule change was incomplete because it found there would be no significant cost to individuals or businesses that must comply.
In a letter submitted to health officials, the groups director wrote that the average basic fee for funeral services is $2,000.
...
The proposed rule does not indicate who would pay those costs. Hospitals and abortion providers currently contract with third-party medical waste disposal services.
During the hearing, Joe Pojman, executive director of Texas Alliance for Life, suggested that abortion providers should absorb any nominal increase in costs associated with the cremation or burial rule as some funeral homes and cemeteries do in cases of miscarriages.
In questioning the health-related justifications for the proposed rules, Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice Texas testified that state health officials have not provided any evidence that current methods used by abortion providers to dispose of fetal tissue which have been approved by the state for 20 years are less safe or not optimal for public health and safety.
State officials have defended the rule change, saying it was proposed in the best interests of the public health of Texas. They also say the proposed rule change reflects the states efforts to affirm the highest standards of human dignity.
Planned Parenthood has pointed out that the proposed rules treat fetal tissue differently than other medical tissue.
The rule change would not apply to other human tissue that might be removed during surgery, for instance, and the existing disposal methods were not modified for the placenta, gestational sac and other tissue that results from miscarriages and abortions, the organization wrote to health officials.
...
For too long, Texas has allowed the most innocent among us to be thrown out with the daily waste, Huffines said on Thursday.
A similar fetal remains measure was signed into law in Indiana but was later blocked by a federal judge, who ruled the state did not have a legitimate state interest in treating fetal tissue similarly to human remains once a pregnancy was terminated.
A spokeswoman for health department said it would carefully review Thursdays testimony and the more than 12,000 comments that were submitted in writing as they finalize the rule change.
Once the rules are finalized they will be posted in the Texas Register and would be effective 20 days later, said Carrie Williams, the departments spokeswoman. She added the department is hoping to finalize the rule change before the fall.
https://www.texastribune.org/2016/0...al&utm_source=facebook&utm_content=1470340163
Not even trying to hide their attempt to kill abortion by making it unaffordable for many people.
As always it's the poor who will suffer most.