I would say we learned our lesson about sex work much like we did about slavery. Maybe some open minded youngsters will give it another go in the coming years.No, your logic implied that if something has been found to be ”bad” by millenia of societal experience, it is therefore a valid conclusion and should apply to today’s society. By the same logic, going by the norm for the majority of the past several thousand tears, abolition of slavery = bad
I think the stigmatization of sex work is due to the risk of STDs. The moral reasoning is just after the fact to make it more digestible for the massesI would say we learned our lesson about sex work much like we did about slavery. Maybe some open minded youngsters will give it another go in the coming years.
I just find it gross, I don't know how else to put it other than that.
But it did start to become a pet peeve of mine in recent years when I was being "corrected" by various people in conversations, and that's when I really started to gravitate toward this debate.
It can destroy family life too. The family structure gave men a reason to work and hold up the societal contract. Without that you're left with rampant hypergamy, which we're starting to see the effects of now with men just dropping out. STDs are really the least of my concerns with it.I think the stigmatization of sex work is due to the risk of STDs. The moral reasoning is just after the fact to make it more digestible for the masses
This is accurate I'd say. I have more issue with the policing of language than the term sex worker in itself. I don't take offense to it. Like I mentioned in the OP I prefer prostitute and it's my choice, but I don't get mad when people use sex worker. There are people who do take issue with the use of prostitute though. But maybe I should just not pay them any mind and treat them with the same level of neglect like I do when people take issue with the term fat.Without trying to read your mind, I think the majority of your issues with this terminology come from personal feelings and annoyance about your language being policed, not actual logic surrounding definitions and linguistic utility.
"Work" at its most basic definition is exchanging labor/time for money or some other form of compensation. Legality or the wholesome nature factor of that work is not relevant to the inherent definition. Legality is also subjectively objective, depending merely on the jurisdiction you happen to be under. Danger factor is also variable depending on how it is practiced.
Sounds a bit puritan tbh, if you're trying to blame modern issues on it then you're turning away from the facts that prostitution and other forms of sex work have been around since the dawn of time no matter how much people have tried to ban it or make it illegal. It's just one of those time old traditions, some people want sex, some people sell it, some people will buy it.It can destroy family life too. The family structure gave men a reason to work and hold up the societal contract. Without that you're left with rampant hypergamy, which we're starting to see the effects of now with men just dropping out. STDs are really the least of my concerns with it.
The ancient Greeks had Plato, we have DragoonKain giving us deep philosophical answers to life's big questions.
My opinion is that we should go back to harlot. It's a fun word to say...'harrlott'.
We've got two thousand years of implied data on sex work and it's effect on the people involved and society around it. Nearly unanimously every culture decided to suppress it. Yet in 2024 America we have this weird need to re-litigate every single norm that has ever been established. I guess the thinking is "maybe our ancestors were just meanie prudes". It's absolutely brain dead. So I guess we have to subject thousands if not millions to the pain of figuring out what has been long figured.
Which one did I overlook?This is categorically not true, and I'm not sure how you could arrive at such a supposition?
Which one did I overlook?
Not suppressed data, but decided that it was a good thing to disallow it. Either legally or just with social shame. I'm sure we can find some poorly developed places that didn't have the structure to do it, but lets give 1980 as an example. How many developed countries were embracing legal prostitution in 1980?Are you saying that cultures have supressed data on prostitution? Because a very quick search on Google proves that this is not the case.
Or are you saying cultures have supressed prostitution itself? Because that's not true, either.
Like I mentioned in the OP I prefer prostitute and it's my choice, but I don't get mad when people use sex worker.
That always bothers me in TV or movies when the John pays the girl last just before leaving.
One time I hired two high end escorts. Made one do housekeeping while the other pleased me
I'm not a conservative. Speaking of phony, you just made up an entire narrative about the "real meaning" behind my take to fit your baseless projection about me. Not a single thing you projected there is a shred of what I believe or feel about women and/or prostitutes.It takes so long for conservative people to get to the point, because they spend the first paragraphs doing this phony attempt at fairness... It's so boring.
You can summarize this post with "Prostitutes are disgusting people, and are corrupting their femininity, therefore prostitution is evil". With your obligatory inclusion of "It affects men badly", without showing an alternative, or considering why sex workers exist in the first place. But that would require actually caring about men, instead of using them for a trojan horse.
Is just your same BORING insecure whining about non-pure women, slut-shaming shit that everyone has heard of already.
But again, always followed by a wall of phony fluff, to make it sound more nuanced then it is.
And if that's what you believe, that's fine.
Writing an essay about a group of people that have zero impact on your life, seems really unhealthy, but whatever, do what you want.
I call them sex-workers because prostitutes and escorts sounds stupid and outdated to me. And sex-workers is way more accurate of name for what they do.
That always bothers me in TV or movies when the John pays the girl last just before leaving.
Hollywood needs to hire whore whisperers.
Please explain to me like a 5 year old how this practice benefits the ladies.That's actually accurate in some places.
Got 'im!“Hey, we’re getting pizza. What do you like on yours?”
DragoonKain: “Well, before I tell you, let me explain why this topping is my preferred choice.”
”Uh, yeah, that’s not necessary. Just tell us what you want.”
DragoonKain: “Naturally, it began with my childhood….”
”You know, Gary and Lisa skipped lunch, if we could hurry this along?”
DragoonKain: “And statistics have shown this topping stays warmer slightly longer than other toppings, so even a lengthy car ride will not…..”
Truly a man who knows how to divide his time wisely.One time I hired two high end escorts. Made one do housekeeping while the other pleased me
It takes so long for conservative people to get to the point, because they spend the first paragraphs doing this phony attempt at fairness... It's so boring.
You can summarize this post with "Prostitutes are disgusting people, and are corrupting their femininity, therefore prostitution is evil". With your obligatory inclusion of "It affects men badly", without showing an alternative, or considering why sex workers exist in the first place. But that would require actually caring about men, instead of using them for a trojan horse.
Is just your same BORING insecure whining about non-pure women, slut-shaming shit that everyone has heard of already.
But again, always followed by a wall of phony fluff, to make it sound more nuanced then it is.
And if that's what you believe, that's fine.
Writing an essay about a group of people that have zero impact on your life, seems really unhealthy, but whatever, do what you want.
I call them sex-workers because prostitutes and escorts sounds stupid and outdated to me. And sex-workers is way more accurate of name for what they do.
Prostitution is not illegal in a lot of countries, what is illegal is making profit out of it, and most of the time this is still restricted to third parties (to not let women be forced by their "pimps" into providing sex services).1) It's consensual. It's two people mutually agreeing to exchange money for pleasure. This makes it different from drugs, which are illegal and also have severe health consequences. Ummm... prostitution is also illegal, so that argument is and prostitution also has severe health consequences so that argument is also
Presumably the people doing the work?Agreed. Who the fuck cares what its called.
I'm just curious if the one tasked with housekeeping was happy about it, or felt offended in some way?One time I hired two high end escorts. Made one do housekeeping while the other pleased me
There is no good reason, if you’re not of a religious persuasion, to keep prostitution illegal.
On average, countries where prostitution is legal experience larger reported human trafficking inflows.
the models that seem to “produce” more victims […] are ‘new abolitionism’ and ‘regulationism’, whilst the model that seems to “produce” less victims is ‘prohibitionism’”
Case studies of two countries that have criminalized buying sex support the possibility of a causal link from harsher prostitution laws to reduced trafficking. Although the data do not allow us to infer robust causal inference, the results suggest that criminalizing procuring, or going further and criminalizing buying and/or selling sex, may reduce the amount of trafficking to a country.
increases in the prevalence of trafficking that are caused by growth of the overall market for prostitution.
Opportunities for (organised) criminal activities may be inadvertently generated by legislation. Certain types of regulation may facilitate criminal activities, by making a given (legal or illegal) market more vulnerable to organised crime. In this sense, legislation may involuntarily create crime waves. In a quite homogenous area like the European Union, organised criminals, who tend to act rationally weighing costs and benefits of their actions, can easily “shop” those national legislations that facilitate their criminal activities, by making them less difficult, less risky, more profitable/rewarding.
Legal prostitution raises human trafficking rates and makes it much harder to prosecute.
National Legislation on Prostitution and the Trafficking in Women and Children | Think Tank | European Parliament
National Legislation on Prostitution and the Trafficking in Women and Childrenwww.europarl.europa.eu
Using information on 161 countries from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) or a subset of European countries in the same source, Cho, Dreher, and Neumayer and by Jakobsson and Kotsadam published two papers in 2013. The studies rely on UNODC figures despite the fact that UNODC had cautioned against doing so because “the report does not provide information regarding actual numbers of victims” and because of unstandardized definitions, sources, and reporting across countries, with some conflating trafficking, smuggling, and irregular migration. The authors of the two studies concede that it is “difficult, perhaps impossible, to find hard evidence” of a relationship between trafficking and any other phenomenon and that “the underlying data may be of bad quality” and are “limited and unsatisfactory in many ways.” Yet they nevertheless treat the UNODC report as a serviceable data source and conclude that nations that have legalized prostitution have higher rates of human trafficking than countries where prostitution is criminalized.
The Relationship between Prostitution Laws and Sex Trafficking: Theory and Evidence on Scale, Substitution, and Replacement Effects
Sex trafficking is a pervasive problem in many parts of the world. This study investigates the relationship between different types of prostitution laws and thepapers.ssrn.com
increases in the prevalence of trafficking that are caused by growth of the overall market for prostitution.
While the main findings mostly are significant, including in a couple of robustness tests,it is important to underline the fact that each and every result presented in this Article must beinterpreted with great caution. The theoretical results are based on multiple assumptions that arehard to confirm or dispute due to lack of evidence, and they may therefore in the future turn outto be implausible or even completely incorrect. The empirical results suffer from questionablevalidity, which stems from the fact that essentially all data on trafficking, to some extent, isunreliable. In addition, the supposedly harmonized data-collection methods that the EuropeanUnion is attempting to use are only in their test phase and are subject to major revisions. Moreover, the time period for which data is currently available is very limited and covers onlythree years, which further limits the empirical analysis of this Article.
This article debunks the research methodology of these articles:
https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com...-does-it-increase-or-decrease-sex-trafficking
The research you cite appears to be bad.
From the conclusion to this article:
Let me guess, you didn't spend any time researching any papers that showed the benefits of legalised prostitution, and just jumped on these articles after a quick Google search, because you thought they appeared to support your preconceived notions of 'deviant behaviour?'
They open themselves up to violence from their customers or pimp, to the possibility of being human trafficked, increased likelihood of STD, of drug use, as well as a myriad of negative physical and psychological effects on their bodies. But hey you know, we should remove the social stigma around it because it's such a wholesome activity. Yeah, no thanks. The stigma serves a purpose.
I also find it interesting that the more that western societies seem to not value the family structure as they used to, the more these arguments seem to pop up. It's easy to have a callous attitude about prostitution when you have no skin in the game. If you're a father, you don't want your daughter to grow up in a world where prostitution is 100% legal, you want to keep her away from the bad stuff at any cost. It has nothing to do with religion.
It takes its toll on the vast majority of people doing it, unless they're in a position where they can afford to be discriminating, and don't really need the money, which is not many people in that line of work."Sad, depressed prostitute" is simply not true most of the time. When prostitution is legal most of the women doing it are choosing to do it for various reasons. People that don't know any woman doing this kind of work are now experts on how bad legal prostitution is, hahaha.