• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The accepted use of the term "sex worker" instead of prostitute. Tell me if/why my stance on this is wrong.

Mistake

Gold Member
The only reason why sex worker is used is to remove any stigmatization involving sex. It falls under the umbrella of the body positivity movement, much to the detriment of public health.
But seeing as it's one of those things people are going to do anyway, it might as well be regulated. Like a brothel. Then you know there are certain standards and regular testing
 
Last edited:

simpatico

Member
No, your logic implied that if something has been found to be ”bad” by millenia of societal experience, it is therefore a valid conclusion and should apply to today’s society. By the same logic, going by the norm for the majority of the past several thousand tears, abolition of slavery = bad
I would say we learned our lesson about sex work much like we did about slavery. Maybe some open minded youngsters will give it another go in the coming years.
 

Trilobit

Gold Member
The ancient Greeks had Plato, we have DragoonKain giving us deep philosophical answers to life's big questions.

My opinion is that we should go back to harlot. It's a fun word to say...'harrlott'.
 

E-Cat

Member
I would say we learned our lesson about sex work much like we did about slavery. Maybe some open minded youngsters will give it another go in the coming years.
I think the stigmatization of sex work is due to the risk of STDs. The moral reasoning is just after the fact to make it more digestible for the masses
 

YCoCg

Member
Sex Work is the umbrella term as it covers a wide range of things, selling pictures of your feet so some weirdo can jerk off over them is sex work for example.
 

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
I just find it gross, I don't know how else to put it other than that.

But it did start to become a pet peeve of mine in recent years when I was being "corrected" by various people in conversations, and that's when I really started to gravitate toward this debate.


Without trying to read your mind, I think the majority of your issues with this terminology come from personal feelings and annoyance about your language being policed, not actual logic surrounding definitions and linguistic utility.

"Work" at its most basic definition is exchanging labor/time for money or some other form of compensation. Legality or the wholesome nature factor of that work is not relevant to the inherent definition. Legality is also subjectively objective, depending merely on the jurisdiction you happen to be under. Danger factor is also variable depending on how it is practiced.
 

simpatico

Member
I think the stigmatization of sex work is due to the risk of STDs. The moral reasoning is just after the fact to make it more digestible for the masses
It can destroy family life too. The family structure gave men a reason to work and hold up the societal contract. Without that you're left with rampant hypergamy, which we're starting to see the effects of now with men just dropping out. STDs are really the least of my concerns with it.
 

DragoonKain

Neighbours from Hell
Without trying to read your mind, I think the majority of your issues with this terminology come from personal feelings and annoyance about your language being policed, not actual logic surrounding definitions and linguistic utility.

"Work" at its most basic definition is exchanging labor/time for money or some other form of compensation. Legality or the wholesome nature factor of that work is not relevant to the inherent definition. Legality is also subjectively objective, depending merely on the jurisdiction you happen to be under. Danger factor is also variable depending on how it is practiced.
This is accurate I'd say. I have more issue with the policing of language than the term sex worker in itself. I don't take offense to it. Like I mentioned in the OP I prefer prostitute and it's my choice, but I don't get mad when people use sex worker. There are people who do take issue with the use of prostitute though. But maybe I should just not pay them any mind and treat them with the same level of neglect like I do when people take issue with the term fat.
 

YCoCg

Member
It can destroy family life too. The family structure gave men a reason to work and hold up the societal contract. Without that you're left with rampant hypergamy, which we're starting to see the effects of now with men just dropping out. STDs are really the least of my concerns with it.
Sounds a bit puritan tbh, if you're trying to blame modern issues on it then you're turning away from the facts that prostitution and other forms of sex work have been around since the dawn of time no matter how much people have tried to ban it or make it illegal. It's just one of those time old traditions, some people want sex, some people sell it, some people will buy it.
 

nush

Member
The ancient Greeks had Plato, we have DragoonKain giving us deep philosophical answers to life's big questions.

My opinion is that we should go back to harlot. It's a fun word to say...'harrlott'.
MV5BNGNmMmNjMjgtOGY0OS00YTBiLWJmZjktOWY1YTY2MTg1YTZmXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMzU3NDIwNDA@._V1_.jpg


For the more discerning punter.
 

FunkMiller

Gold Member
We've got two thousand years of implied data on sex work and it's effect on the people involved and society around it. Nearly unanimously every culture decided to suppress it. Yet in 2024 America we have this weird need to re-litigate every single norm that has ever been established. I guess the thinking is "maybe our ancestors were just meanie prudes". It's absolutely brain dead. So I guess we have to subject thousands if not millions to the pain of figuring out what has been long figured.

This is categorically not true, and I'm not sure how you could arrive at such a supposition?
 
Its what the word implies that makes the importance and that cant simply be changed with censorship. Its the same reason trying to change the R word is useless. Special, challenged, handicapped.. So you use a new word, people(mostly kids) start using it as the insult instead. now you have new offensive words that are taboo, and create a new "correct" word.. the cycle will continue
 

simpatico

Member
Are you saying that cultures have supressed data on prostitution? Because a very quick search on Google proves that this is not the case.

Or are you saying cultures have supressed prostitution itself? Because that's not true, either.
Not suppressed data, but decided that it was a good thing to disallow it. Either legally or just with social shame. I'm sure we can find some poorly developed places that didn't have the structure to do it, but lets give 1980 as an example. How many developed countries were embracing legal prostitution in 1980?
 

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
Like I mentioned in the OP I prefer prostitute and it's my choice, but I don't get mad when people use sex worker.

Very true, but to put that into context, there are probably zero people who use the term "sex worker" pejoratively, whereas there are a non-zero amount of people who use the term "prostitute" pejoratively. If your conversational partner has no idea how you specifically are using the term, then they're probably going to make assumptions based on the most common ways people use those words in conversation.
 
It takes so long for conservative people to get to the point, because they spend the first paragraphs doing this phony attempt at fairness... It's so boring.

You can summarize this post with "Prostitutes are disgusting people, and are corrupting their femininity, therefore prostitution is evil". With your obligatory inclusion of "It affects men badly", without showing an alternative, or considering why sex workers exist in the first place. But that would require actually caring about men, instead of using them for a trojan horse.

Is just your same BORING insecure whining about non-pure women, slut-shaming shit that everyone has heard of already.

But again, always followed by a wall of phony fluff, to make it sound more nuanced then it is.

And if that's what you believe, that's fine.
Writing an essay about a group of people that have zero impact on your life, seems really unhealthy, but whatever, do what you want.

I call them sex-workers because prostitutes and escorts sounds stupid and outdated to me. And sex-workers is way more accurate of name for what they do.
 
Last edited:

Soodanim

Member
I've been under the impression that sex worker was the wider class of industry, and prostitution is the profession within that class. Sex worker is too vague to be a replacement term.
 

DragoonKain

Neighbours from Hell
It takes so long for conservative people to get to the point, because they spend the first paragraphs doing this phony attempt at fairness... It's so boring.

You can summarize this post with "Prostitutes are disgusting people, and are corrupting their femininity, therefore prostitution is evil". With your obligatory inclusion of "It affects men badly", without showing an alternative, or considering why sex workers exist in the first place. But that would require actually caring about men, instead of using them for a trojan horse.

Is just your same BORING insecure whining about non-pure women, slut-shaming shit that everyone has heard of already.

But again, always followed by a wall of phony fluff, to make it sound more nuanced then it is.

And if that's what you believe, that's fine.
Writing an essay about a group of people that have zero impact on your life, seems really unhealthy, but whatever, do what you want.

I call them sex-workers because prostitutes and escorts sounds stupid and outdated to me. And sex-workers is way more accurate of name for what they do.
I'm not a conservative. Speaking of phony, you just made up an entire narrative about the "real meaning" behind my take to fit your baseless projection about me. Not a single thing you projected there is a shred of what I believe or feel about women and/or prostitutes.
 

West Texas CEO

GAF's Nicest Lunch Thief and Nosiest Dildo Archeologist
“Hey, we’re getting pizza. What do you like on yours?”
DragoonKain: “Well, before I tell you, let me explain why this topping is my preferred choice.”
”Uh, yeah, that’s not necessary. Just tell us what you want.”
DragoonKain: “Naturally, it began with my childhood….”
”You know, Gary and Lisa skipped lunch, if we could hurry this along?”
DragoonKain: “And statistics have shown this topping stays warmer slightly longer than other toppings, so even a lengthy car ride will not…..”
Got 'im! 🤣

Imagine wasting any mental time & energy over "semantics"
 
Last edited:

FunkMiller

Gold Member
It takes so long for conservative people to get to the point, because they spend the first paragraphs doing this phony attempt at fairness... It's so boring.

You can summarize this post with "Prostitutes are disgusting people, and are corrupting their femininity, therefore prostitution is evil". With your obligatory inclusion of "It affects men badly", without showing an alternative, or considering why sex workers exist in the first place. But that would require actually caring about men, instead of using them for a trojan horse.

Is just your same BORING insecure whining about non-pure women, slut-shaming shit that everyone has heard of already.

But again, always followed by a wall of phony fluff, to make it sound more nuanced then it is.

And if that's what you believe, that's fine.
Writing an essay about a group of people that have zero impact on your life, seems really unhealthy, but whatever, do what you want.

I call them sex-workers because prostitutes and escorts sounds stupid and outdated to me. And sex-workers is way more accurate of name for what they do.

Puritans trying not to sound puritan by using a hundred words when two will do will never not be funny to me. Bless them for thinking they’re getting away with it.

Anyway, legalised prostitution has been a roaring, positive success in New South Wales.

https://www.eswalliance.org/decriminalisation_improves_health_wellbeing_2022_scoping_review

There is no good reason, if you’re not of a religious persuasion, to keep prostitution illegal.
 
Last edited:

Cyberpunkd

Gold Member
1) It's consensual. It's two people mutually agreeing to exchange money for pleasure. This makes it different from drugs, which are illegal and also have severe health consequences. Ummm... prostitution is also illegal, so that argument is ❌ and prostitution also has severe health consequences so that argument is also❌
Prostitution is not illegal in a lot of countries, what is illegal is making profit out of it, and most of the time this is still restricted to third parties (to not let women be forced by their "pimps" into providing sex services).
As for health consequences - chances are you are much more likely to get an STD from a hoe you met in the club than from an escort, since any STD is a direct threat to her income.
 

thefool

Member
OP this is simply language codification to try to normalize deviant behaviors. You'll see this everywhere these days, you change the language to normalize a behavior and then reconfigure the overton window.

There is no good reason, if you’re not of a religious persuasion, to keep prostitution illegal.

Legal prostitution raises human trafficking rates and makes it much harder to prosecute.


On average, countries where prostitution is legal experience larger reported human trafficking inflows.


the models that seem to “produce” more victims […] are ‘new abolitionism’ and ‘regulationism’, whilst the model that seems to “produce” less victims is ‘prohibitionism’”


Case studies of two countries that have criminalized buying sex support the possibility of a causal link from harsher prostitution laws to reduced trafficking. Although the data do not allow us to infer robust causal inference, the results suggest that criminalizing procuring, or going further and criminalizing buying and/or selling sex, may reduce the amount of trafficking to a country.


increases in the prevalence of trafficking that are caused by growth of the overall market for prostitution.

This EU report has a summary of a few other studies about the subject

Opportunities for (organised) criminal activities may be inadvertently generated by legislation. Certain types of regulation may facilitate criminal activities, by making a given (legal or illegal) market more vulnerable to organised crime. In this sense, legislation may involuntarily create crime waves. In a quite homogenous area like the European Union, organised criminals, who tend to act rationally weighing costs and benefits of their actions, can easily “shop” those national legislations that facilitate their criminal activities, by making them less difficult, less risky, more profitable/rewarding.
 
Last edited:

FunkMiller

Gold Member
Legal prostitution raises human trafficking rates and makes it much harder to prosecute.



This article debunks the research methodology of these articles:

https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com...-does-it-increase-or-decrease-sex-trafficking

Using information on 161 countries from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) or a subset of European countries in the same source, Cho, Dreher, and Neumayer and by Jakobsson and Kotsadam published two papers in 2013. The studies rely on UNODC figures despite the fact that UNODC had cautioned against doing so because “the report does not provide information regarding actual numbers of victims” and because of unstandardized definitions, sources, and reporting across countries, with some conflating trafficking, smuggling, and irregular migration. The authors of the two studies concede that it is “difficult, perhaps impossible, to find hard evidence” of a relationship between trafficking and any other phenomenon and that “the underlying data may be of bad quality” and are “limited and unsatisfactory in many ways.” Yet they nevertheless treat the UNODC report as a serviceable data source and conclude that nations that have legalized prostitution have higher rates of human trafficking than countries where prostitution is criminalized.

The research you cite appears to be bad.


increases in the prevalence of trafficking that are caused by growth of the overall market for prostitution.

From the conclusion to this article:

While the main findings mostly are significant, including in a couple of robustness tests,it is important to underline the fact that each and every result presented in this Article must beinterpreted with great caution. The theoretical results are based on multiple assumptions that arehard to confirm or dispute due to lack of evidence, and they may therefore in the future turn outto be implausible or even completely incorrect. The empirical results suffer from questionablevalidity, which stems from the fact that essentially all data on trafficking, to some extent, isunreliable. In addition, the supposedly harmonized data-collection methods that the EuropeanUnion is attempting to use are only in their test phase and are subject to major revisions. Moreover, the time period for which data is currently available is very limited and covers onlythree years, which further limits the empirical analysis of this Article.

Let me guess, you didn't spend any time researching papers that showed the benefits of legalised prostitution (of which there are many), and just jumped on these articles after a quick Google search, because you thought they appeared to support your preconceived notions of how bad prostitution is, and people's 'deviant behaviour?'
 
Last edited:

thefool

Member
This article debunks the research methodology of these articles:

https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com...-does-it-increase-or-decrease-sex-trafficking



The research you cite appears to be bad.



From the conclusion to this article:



Let me guess, you didn't spend any time researching any papers that showed the benefits of legalised prostitution, and just jumped on these articles after a quick Google search, because you thought they appeared to support your preconceived notions of 'deviant behaviour?'

If you had actually looked what i posted, instead of trying to google an half-ass reply, you would have noticed that all of the studies I posted are actually from the systematic review of the section 5.1 of the Publications Office of the European Union Report. But perhaps the EU author assessment from such studies are also not good enough for you. To be fair, I was not expecting you to lack even the most basic understanding of research to bring blog opinions to try to discredit academic studies, and worse, cite studies limitations to try to discredit their conclusions.

I understand its hard to cope with reality and your preconceived notion has been shattered, but all the data points that legalization is not a good solution. Even a layman would understand that making the attack surface bigger will only create a bigger problem.

As for the deviant behavior, i would suggest you to simply open an history book.
 
Last edited:

clem84

Gold Member
The OP's point was about semantics. Prostitution means something very specific. Money in exchange for real life sex. It is the correct term IMO.

Isn't it interesting that this stigma happened by itself? I'm sure that originally when someone came up with the word 'prostitution', the goal was not to stigmatize the activity, but to simply come up with a word to refer to it. The stigma happened because naturally, human beings know that it is problematic behavior that can lead to lots of bad stuff.

After googling a bit, it's not so clear to me that keeping it illegal is preferable. Laws are not meant to be perfect. Laws are passed because they will help society in some way. If the data showed that decriminalizing it is preferable, I would have zero problem with that. But this doesn't remove the personal cost that the prostitutes/sex workers will have to pay.

They open themselves up to violence from their customers or pimp, to the possibility of being human trafficked, increased likelihood of STD, of drug use, as well as a myriad of negative physical and psychological effects on their bodies. But hey you know, we should remove the social stigma around it because it's such a wholesome activity. Yeah, no thanks. The stigma serves a purpose.

I also find it interesting that the more that western societies seem to not value the family structure as they used to, the more these arguments seem to pop up. It's easy to have a callous attitude about prostitution when you have no skin in the game. If you're a father, you don't want your daughter to grow up in a world where prostitution is 100% legal, you want to keep her away from the bad stuff at any cost. It has nothing to do with religion.
 
Last edited:

SlimySnake

Flashless at the Golden Globes
Lets just call these whores whores please.

Same goes for strippers, only fans whores, escorts, sugar babies, and anyone who accepts money/favors/gifts in exchange for sex. W.H.O.R.E. Pronounced HORE.
 

thefool

Member
They open themselves up to violence from their customers or pimp, to the possibility of being human trafficked, increased likelihood of STD, of drug use, as well as a myriad of negative physical and psychological effects on their bodies. But hey you know, we should remove the social stigma around it because it's such a wholesome activity. Yeah, no thanks. The stigma serves a purpose.

I also find it interesting that the more that western societies seem to not value the family structure as they used to, the more these arguments seem to pop up. It's easy to have a callous attitude about prostitution when you have no skin in the game. If you're a father, you don't want your daughter to grow up in a world where prostitution is 100% legal, you want to keep her away from the bad stuff at any cost. It has nothing to do with religion.

This news report has a first hand account of exactly what you describe. Women keep being abused, only now that falls under a very obscure legality. Pimps become entrepreneurs, and the asymmetrical legislation worldwide makes it that trafficking flocks to these places



It represents a moral decay that, also as you said, is absurdly hypocritical.

The 2021 EU report suggests that countries should limit penalizing women but criminalize the clients (this is already the legal framework of several countries), which is the sort of middle of the road solution that imo still leaves a lot to abuse but its still better than transforming countries into brothels.
 
Last edited:

Bojji

Gold Member
Vast majority of prostitutes I have encountered were super chill and positive persons. They didn't look abused or anything and if topic of this kind of work was discussed, what I learned is they wanted to do this kind of work and some even liked it very much (pleasure + money).



This is pretty accurate ^

"Sad, depressed prostitute" is simply not true most of the time. When prostitution is legal most of the women doing it are choosing to do it for various reasons. People that don't know any woman doing this kind of work are now experts on how bad legal prostitution is, hahaha.
 

SF Kosmo

Al Jazeera Special Reporter
I don't think it's really a matter of stigma, I think the term was popularized because it's much broader/more inclusive. Sex workers aren't all prostitutes, the term includes everything from Onlyfans models, strippers, dominatrices, cam girls, anything involving using their bodies or sexuality to make money.

When people want to euphemistically refer to women who have sex for money in a less stigmatized they usually say "escort" or whatever. Sex workers is broader.
 

SF Kosmo

Al Jazeera Special Reporter
"Sad, depressed prostitute" is simply not true most of the time. When prostitution is legal most of the women doing it are choosing to do it for various reasons. People that don't know any woman doing this kind of work are now experts on how bad legal prostitution is, hahaha.
It takes its toll on the vast majority of people doing it, unless they're in a position where they can afford to be discriminating, and don't really need the money, which is not many people in that line of work.

Like yes, the mere act of collecting money after sex or having sex with strangers is not inherently traumatic, but being in a situation where you have to have sex with people you would never choose to because you have to put food on the table is something that fucks you up.
 

DeafTourette

Perpetually Offended
Prohibitionism doesn't reduce human trafficking... We have prohibition here in the US and we're a MAJOR hub for sex trafficking victims. No state in the union has legalized prostitution... There's a city or two that has in Nevada and they seem to be safe there.
 
Top Bottom