The interior is...interesting. The exterior is giving me AMC Eagle vibes, with respect to looking like a jacked up car.
The interior is...interesting. The exterior is giving me AMC Eagle vibes, with respect to looking like a jacked up car.
That's gonna be my next company car!
http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i216/OnkelC/68f4c50d.jpg[/IMG
[IMG]http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i216/OnkelC/353efcd3.jpg[/IMG
[B]it's a beauty by design[/B] and a clever idea to spec a car to be fun at medium speeds.[/QUOTE]
No, not even.
yes, absolutely.No, not even.
yes, absolutely.
Let's not fight over such subjective things as looks. That's how wars get startedNope. I will fight you to death on this.
IMO, the new viper is way way better than that of the mid 2000's viper. Man, that 1998 viper was hot. Those curves were amazing, and I am happy they are back. I didn't like what they did with the 2003-2012, they started looking too corvette-ish, and looked too bland imo.I'm really happy that Chevy has found a front end/grille design and shape that can define their car styles for years and years to come. It feels like so many companies flail around trying different looks and never getting anything that really works (Lexus, Toyota, Acura, Honda, etc.) so their design team should be really proud.
needed less curves and more defining lines. on the doors and going towards the back in particular.
IMO, the new viper is way way better than that of the mid 2000's viper. Man, that 1998 viper was hot. Those curves were amazing, and I am happy they are back. I didn't like what they did with the 2003-2012, they started looking too corvette-ish, and looked too bland imo.
Hot...
![]()
I think the rounded-everything is a style from the 90s and early 2000s that could have stayed in the 90s and early 2000s.
Nope. I will fight you to death on this.
Let's not fight over such subjective things as looks. That's how wars get started
Yeah, pretty much everything was boxy. The 1986 Taurus was considered a revolution in design, and it's not particularly rounded.Which was in direct response to the everything square phenomenon in the 1980s.
How many cars from the 80s do you remember not being shoeboxes?
Which was in direct response to the everything square phenomenon in the 1980s.
How many cars from the 80s do you remember not being shoeboxes?
Sure but were cars looking like shoeboxes in 2009? Maybe you missed it, but we're talking about why a car in 2012 looks like a car from 1999 in shape. I think the new Viper could have been better adapted to 2012 stylings. Less 1999 rounded body, more definition and shape. Particularly to the doors leading to the trunk.
If you like it, get a matching hat and wear it out in style. My opinion is as presented and needs no further justification.
Yes, which was an odd thing to do after the American Revolution was won in Dodge Challengers.Yes, didn't the War of 1812 start because the British insulted James Madison by saying that his new Mustang was ugly and bulky?
Good Lord that is bad. That ride height and the wheel arches look comically stupid.
This is the exact same car Lambo brought to NYC and revealed it behind closed doors to their most loyal buyers.
ima gonna keel you wit mah bike biatchNope. I will fight you to death on this.
ima gonna keel you wit mah bike biatch
http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i216/OnkelC/Motorrad001.jpg[/IMG
yes, that's me and yes, it was a Rickman if anybody cares.
so the cool is on me and the yolk's on you.[/QUOTE]
I have already discovered a major flaw in your plan of attack: sharp corners.
your knees are sharp.I have already discovered a major flaw in your plan of attack: sharp corners.
your knees are sharp.
So I called the guy about the 2.5rs I posted about yesterday. here's the summary
- he's had the car for about 7 years since about the 100k kilometer mark after buying from the local subaru dealer.
- Headgasket has not been replaced. I will thoroughly check this to see if it's an issue with this car.
- The 168k kilometer (105k mile) maintenance has not been performed.
- Recently had the clutch replaced after a trip.
- One wheel bearing is bad.
- Does not have complete service records.
Honestly doesn't make me confident about the car's past. I can do the timing belt/water pump, but the fact that the timing belt is past due is worrisome. I am going to look at it on monday, so I will let you guys know how that goes.
would you rather drive that or a panamera?
would you rather drive that or a panamera?
would you rather drive that or a panamera?
Thank you. To think that new, thing, is better is crazy to me.Lambo tractors were the shit.
Don't hate.
Love that the BRZ/FRS hate is still alive here. Despite how well this thing is going to sell, doesn't mean shit. It's still slow, not that great looking, and has a spartan interior.
So I called the guy about the 2.5rs I posted about yesterday. here's the summary
Honestly doesn't make me confident about the car's past. I can do the timing belt/water pump, but the fact that the timing belt is past due is worrisome. I am going to look at it on monday, so I will let you guys know how that goes.
Lambo tractors were the shit.
Don't hate.
Wait, you want to keep the engine? I'd only be worried about what condition the body is in.
would you rather drive that or a panamera?
It's not the first time. And the one you linked to is waaaaaay better than previous efforts.
![]()
![]()
Lambo started as a tractor company, after all.
Just got my baby tinted, 15%
![]()
that's some dark tint.
I did 35% on mine and am satisfied with it.
It's light compared to the car I had before this one.
5% on my previous Accord. Couldn't see a damn thing even with your face smack against the window.![]()
It's light compared to the car I had before this one.
5% on my previous Accord. Couldn't see a damn thing even with your face smack against the window.![]()
Created a winner.
Eh, I already have a turbo awd car. I'm looking for a decent daily driver.
what car is that? Evo? Audi? GSX Eclipse?