Biggest-Geek-Ever
Member
abload FTW.
Remember the last time a third movie in a superhero series was good?
Me neither
then again, before Nolan I can't remember the last time a live-action Batman was good, soooooo...
Remember the last time a third movie in a superhero series was good?
Me neither
then again, before Nolan I can't remember the last time a live-action Batman was good, soooooo...
Remember the last time a third movie in a superhero series was good?
Me neither.
How many superhero movie franchise reach the third movie to begin with?
We have Superman.
Iron Man is getting there.
...
seeing how wb let him be and even respected his distaste for 3d, i don't think this wwill be SM3This is going to be Nolan's Spiderman 3...I can feel it. God I hope not.
How many superhero movie franchise reach the third movie to begin with?
We have Superman.
Iron Man is getting there.
...
Good input.
It is funny though that Marlon Wayans got paid in full and never even got to be on set for Batman Returns.
Who got more for nothing Marlon or Billy D?
Batman Forev-ahBilly D got paid for Returns or Forever?
Different directors don't count.
Remember the last time a third movie in a superhero series was good?
Me neither
then again, before Nolan I can't remember the last time a live-action Batman was good, soooooo...
The only thing I remember from Forever was this awesome song.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMD2TwRvuoU
Billy D got paid for Returns or Forever?
Oh you mean the original.
Yeah he was a great Harvey Dent, even though he didn't do much.
Yeah but did Marlon Wayans get paid more for never being RobinHe got paid for Forever. A lot. He knew Dent would become Two-Face so he got it in his contract for '89's Batman that they'd have to use him for Two-Face. WB had to pay him a ton of money to get out of that deal to use Tommy Lee Jones.
Billy Dee as Two-Face would have been great.
He got paid for Forever. A lot. He knew Dent would become Two-Face so he got it in his contract for '89's Batman that he'd have some sort of say in playing him in future films. WB had to pay him a ton of money to get out of that deal to use Tommy Lee Jones.
Billy Dee as Two-Face would have been great.
Yeah he would've been great.
AH well.
Hmm, I wonder how Mel Gibson as Two Face would've been like.
This is more grounded-in-reality than Nolan's grounded-in-reality.
This is more grounded-in-reality than Nolan's grounded-in-reality.
that's just asking to be in a fan poster
I feel like such a dork for wanting to pick up a Batman and Bane action figure and The Bat or the Batpod.
I couldn't walk to the counter with them with a straight face XD
It would be swollen for days.How so? A intense burn wound wouldn't look like that just hours after the incident.
Crave Online: But what happens to Harvey Dent is so grotesque, was that image a problem?
Christopher Nolan: No. Everybody involved really, I think, understood the fanciful tone of the extremity of it. When we looked at less extreme versions of it they were too real and more horrifying. There's something, whether you're looking at a film like Pirates of the Caribbean or whatever, about a very fanciful, very detailed visual effect that I think is more palatable to an audience and is less repulsive and more fascinating. It's certainly morbidly fascinating, but it's clearly unreal. I think the visual effects are very well done and the guys involved did a terrific job, but the design of it is clearly fanciful.
omg, what happened to Mel!?
Gordon, Blake, andIs there three figures not yet revealed?
Not sure where to put this or if it's worth posting, but I was reading this article http://www.awardscircuit.com/2012/07/02/the-highlights-and-lowlights-of-2012-thus-far/, and there may or may not be a hint at the writers' TDKR review.
He says "The only 4 star review Ive published so far (hint theres one coming later this month)..." and then says he's planning on writing a best comic book movie of all time article "after the release of The Dark Knight Rises later this month." So I thought that was kind of interesting. Or maybe I'm just thinking way too much about TDKR and am trying to relate everything back to it.
So, seriously, when are we going to get reviews? Is there a firm date or are we all just clueless?
Not enough usage of the c word.Review:
Movie was good! 7/10
BB was still better though.
Not enough usage of the c word.
I wonder how AICN will hyperbolize this film in its review.