As a long time PC gamer I cringe when I see a comment like this. I can understand that someone would be accustomed to using a controller when playing an FPS, but the notion that it is somehow better than KB/M, even as an opinion, is such an alien concept to me. The inefficiency of thumbing frantically trying to line up a shot on a flying dragon would drive me nuts. With a KB/M I'd have killed it, looted the remains and sauntered off with it's soul in the time it would take me to get that one shot off with the controller. Trying to play an FPS with a controller always feels gimped to me.
This is going to come off extremely arrogant but I'm okay with that.
As someone who has been playing PC games with a KB&M since the original Quake and who has played in the competitive FPS scene for over a decade with titles like Quake 3 Arena and CS (1.3-1.6), it always give me a great laugh when someone tries to preach the disadvantages of a controller to me on a game I prefer it in.
If you are playing a RTS, MOBA, or FPS then you will be crippling yourself without the mouse. If you are playing a 3rd action adventure, platformer, racer, or virtually any other genre, your love for the kb&m is probably misplaced since you are very clearly just incompetent with sticks. If you feel the FO or ES series qualify as an FPS game then I seriously cringe. The fact is anyone close to half competent with a controller can breeze through these games on their hardest difficulty and coordination won't ever be a factor.
I guess I'm lucky since I'm close to 30 years old, I was around when FPS games started coming out, lived in a city and state that was arguably the epicenter of the competitive gaming scene in the western world, I've been around since the beginning use of kb&m
and analog sticks in said games, and I've racked up far more than average experience with both.
/arrogance
Well maybe the person you originally quoted wasn't referring to performance, accuracy or efficiency. Both control methods have their pros and cons, so we don't need to look down on others for preferring one over the other.
And performance, accuracy, and efficiency are arguably all of one thing with the guy throwing out synonyms for leverage. In what way is the mouse more "efficient"? In what way is the performance better? The performance is only better in relation to the accuracy, so what he really means to say is that kb&m is more accurate.
So you are sacrificing ergonomics, comfort, more easily interacting with the UI and environment, and potential viewing positions all for the sake of accuracy in
Skyrim, and here is where we reach the point I truly scoff at; Not just the idea that accuracy is an important factor in FO or ES, but the negligible (in a game where hitscan doesn't matter) difference in accuracy you give up for users who are competent with more than one control system.
And I apologize in advance for ultimate derailment but some things I can just look over as one persons ignorance / misconception / misunderstandings but when there were 10 more posts afterward still related to the discussion, I had to put in my real opinion.