On my third watch now and im even starting to rethink my stance on Mckellen, there are a few faults in delivery I can find which really irk me (When he gives sting to Bilbo in particular) but its still very good.
On my third watch now and im even starting to rethink my stance on Mckellen, there are a few faults in delivery I can find which really irk me (When he gives sting to Bilbo in particular) but its still very good.
I'm more wondering how the hell they managed to place the center of that mass of that thing in such a place that it stays upright. That must be one heavy rock.
More like:
Fili: Why couldn't they set us down a little further along the way?
Gandalf: Did you hear that last series of "kaw" sounds as they flew away?
Fili: Yes?
Gandalf: That was Eagleish for "Y'all gonna get eaten by a dragon, fuck that shit. Eagles out, bitches."
My apologies to Christopher Tolkein for my liberties with the mannerisms of eagles.
Edmond Dantès;53317821 said:Bilbo and the party dominated the marketing for AUJ as you'd expect, with Bilbo getting the honour of the official poster. But what of The Desolation of Smaug?
Will they want to reveal Smaug in mere posters and such or will they focus on the Elves and Men this time?
Tauriel maybe or Legolas/Thranduil.
Or generic dragon fire.
Plus shirtless Bard and Thranduil.Oh there will be Legolas marketing. Lots of it.
While we are at it they should do shirtless Legolas+Fili+Kili ads.
Something like this would work. Especially if The Necromancer takes part at the end.Yeah, my female friends refer to fili, kili, and thorin as "the hot ones," and feel very similarly about Thranduil and Legolas. They're crazy if they don't market the hell out of those guys.
They should also focus heavily on teasing darker, dangerous things and completely hide radagast to win back people who thought Radagast was awful and the Goblin king was too "dreamworksy."
Edmond Dantès;53166327 said:I think it's safe to say that the Misty Mountains theme is now Howard Shore's most memorable Middle-earth theme, surpassing even the Fellowship theme.
The full rendition of it in Over Hill is wonderful.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MD8269JEdPA#t=2m45s
Look forward to hearing more variations of it in the next two films.
I did watch in the evening. It was actually only my third time watching it. The previous times were the initial viewing in 24fps 3D and the the second time in HFR 3D. I wasn't able to make the London premiere in the end unfortunately, but there's always the next two red carpet premieres.Oh gods yes, it's definitely my favorite of his Middle Earth music. It does seem like the consensus is that the rendition in Over Hill is the best. I totally agree. Personally, though, it's not too far ahead of the hobbit theme... hobbits theme. Theme for hobbits, lol, crap. At least the Misty Mountains music doesn't make me tear up every time I hear it, I just get shivers down my back <3 Neil Finn's rendition is fucking fantastic as well; the extended version with the extra instrumental bit at the end just makes me melt. Love!
YAY! I'm glad you finally got your copy, Edmond! Did you watch it right away after buying it, or did you wait a whole hour?! I'm totally jealous of the steelbook editions. I've never seen them over here before!
Slight correction; the professor always had it in his mind that The Necromancer was Sauron.In the book itself, Necromancer was just a plot device, so that Gandalf would have an excuse to leave the group, as well as for them not to travel around the forest. He's barely mentioned other than Gandalf saying "oh yeah, I defeated the Necromancer".
When LotR was being written, Necromancer was retroactively re-written to be Sauron. Gandalf gives more backstory there, which has been integrated into the Hobbit movies.
He was not flawless in LotR either. I'm particularly annoyed by his dialogue with Saruman in the chamber, where he mutters "Yes, Sauron" as if he's talking to Sauron himself.
That doesn't stop most of his stuff from being excellent though.
He doesn't say "Yes, Sauron", he says "The eye of Sauron".
He doesn't say "Yes, Sauron", he says "The eye of Sauron".
No way man. No way.Edmond Dantès;53373807 said:The exact dialogue is as follows:
Saruman: Concealed within his fortress, the Lord of Mordor sees all his gaze pierces cloud, shadow, earth and flesh. You know of what I speak, Gandalf a great Eye lidless wreathed in flame.
Gandalf: The Eye of Sauron.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1Vyhve9gtg#t=0m20s
Here's a handy guide detailing all the film's dialogue and the corresponding scene.
http://www.tk421.net/lotr/film/fotr/09.html
Edmond Dantès;53322315 said:Something like this would work. Especially if The Necromancer takes part at the end.
It was so peppered with humour and lightness, says Thorin Oakenshield actor Richard Armitage, because in movies two and three... it gets very, very dark.
It starts off quite light and I think progressively it will get more dangerous and dark as Bilbo gets further from home and in more jeopardy, Gollum star Andy Serkis told us. Well be able to sense that and feel that.
As the quest for the dwarves becomes more complicated and threatening. Itll carry more weight.
http://uk.movies.yahoo.com/exclusiv...rk’-sequel-desolation-of-smaug-135608803.htmlBofur actor James Nesbitt called that same tonal difference in the upcoming sequel a natural part of the journey. It starts off with innocence and hope, said the 48 year-old actor, and I think weve already seen some bits in An Unexpected Journey where there is fear and Bilbo represents a lot of that. But I think in The Desolation of Smaug will get darker as they go into that world.
is that real? smaug design hasn't been revealed yet?
It's a fan mock-up.is that real? smaug design hasn't been revealed yet?
In terms of the Elrond conversation, it was an effective way to deal with one of the copyright issues; not been able to mention the name of Turgon the King of Gondolin, the original owner of Glamdring.The directorial/script decision for characters to speak over more interesting characters is quite irritating, on a rewatch last night. If Christopher Lee is doing what is likely to be his last role, I want to hear what he has to say. Not have Cate Blanchett mind-speaking over the top of him. If Elrond is describing why Glamdring is named for what it is, I want to hear that, and not a letter-opener joke about Sting. Just seems like bookmarking for the Extended Edition in so many ways.
Edmond Dantès;53374626 said:In terms of the Elrond conversation, it was an effective way to deal with one of the copyright issues; not been able to mention the name of Turgon the King of Gondolin, the original owner of Glamdring.
Indeed. It's also the reason why Gandalf doesn't remember the names of the two Blue wizards. Having Gandalf mention Alatar and Pallando by name would have invoked the wroth of the Tolkien Estate. That's why having a Tolkien scholar aiding them was so important.Wow, they are very protective of their stuff. Not being able to mention a name.
No way man. No way.
Against the power of official dialogue there can be no victory. You must join with us, Napalm_Frank. You must embrace official dialogue. It would be wise, my friend.No man, No way.
Don't ruin the movies for me!
Edmond Dantès;53374866 said:Indeed. It's also the reason why Gandalf doesn't remember the names of the two Blue wizards. Having Gandalf mention Alatar and Pallando by name would have invoked the wroth of the Tolkien Estate. That's why having a Tolkien scholar aiding them was so important.
Edmond Dantès;53375331 said:You must join with us, Napalm_Frank. It would be wise, my friend.
So how long after The Hobbit trilogy is done will we see another piece of Tolkien on the big screen?
Could be a decade from now if WB want to keep hold of the licence.So how long after The Hobbit trilogy is done will we see another piece of Tolkien on the big screen?
Edmond Dantès;53376036 said:Dream scenarios... HBO's The Lord of the Rings.
If not HBO, the BBC. Although, they aren't really known for big budget fantasy series. The likes of Merlin et al are produced for a fraction of what HBO spend on their flagship shows.HBO will just make it trendy and sexualized. They'll turn Gollum into a hot female sex slave or something.
HBO will just make it trendy and sexualized. They'll turn Gollum into a hot female sex slave or something.
Edmond Dantès;53383953 said:If not HBO, the BBC. Although, they aren't really known for big budget fantasy series. The likes of Merlin et al are produced for a fraction of what HBO spend on their flagship shows.
Maybe the upcoming Atlantis will buck the trend.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/latestnews/2013/atlantis-casting.html
I think Christopher Tolkien would be too.I would be fine with a BBC Silmarillion radio drama.
You know, for all the outcries about the sex in GoT, which btw, are in the books, lots of it, I don't understand why that show gets all the stick and not Spartacus. Spartacus is insane with its sex.
ASOIAF has all three of those.I just prefer writing like Tolkien that focuses more on the unique aspects of the genre, which is the fantasy, the worldbuilding, and the epic drama. As opposed to just taking sex, violence, and politics and putting it in a fantasy or historical setting, which a lot of shows seem to do these days.
ASOIAF has all three of those.
Edmond Dantès;53388273 said:Why are fantasy world accents British?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17554816
Interesting discussion, although to be a touch pedantic (even though it is addressed in the article), there isn't one unified 'British accent', but many, many regional accents (as is the case in all countries) with Received Pronunciation and Cockney being the most well known around the world.
Ha! I love Bilbo and Gandals first conversation, especially this bit
Gandalf: Im looking for someone to share in an Adventure!
Bilbo: An Adventure... No i dont imagine anyone west of Brie would have much interest in adventures! Nasty, disturbing, uncomfortable things..make you late for dinner!
So well delivered by Martin
Yeah, that's why I don't like the show. To be fair though, I haven't seen much of it.