The N64 launched at $250.M3wThr33 said:NES - $199
SNES - $199
N64 - $199
Cube - $199
The N64 launched at $250.M3wThr33 said:NES - $199
SNES - $199
N64 - $199
Cube - $199
AirBrian said:Not that it really matters, but...
PS2 = October 2000
GCN = November 2001
~13 months.
Goreomedy said:You're from NZ? Nothing good has EVER come from NZ.
-- THE BASTARDS HAVE LANDED
AirBrian said:Not that it really matters, but...
PS2 = October 2000
GCN = November 2001
~13 months.
No. I see people say that all the time. If you paid that much you got fucked. It was going to launch at 250, but Nintendo dropped to 199 about a month or so prior to launch.The N64 launched at $250.
Oops, sorry. I thought you were talking about North America.soundwave05 said:PS2 = March 2000 (Japan)
GCN = September 2001 (Japan)
That's 18 months give or take.
Well but like someone else said Nintendo knows their fans will buy. They don't seem to care about the market anymore imo, they are just going after nintendo fans.Musashi Wins! said:that's too much for the tech and their goals if this speculation is accurate.
No they didn't. I still have my N64 box with a $249.99 sticker on it from Walmart. Somehow I doubt Walmart was price gouging.Drensch said:No. I see people say that all the time. If you padi that much you got fucked. It was going to launch at 250, but Nintendo dropped to 199 about a month or so prior to launch.
Aika'svyse said:Well but like someone else said Nintendo knows their fans will buy. They don't seem to care about the market anymore imo, they are just going after nintendo fans.
Eric_S said:For once I actually went to the last page of a thread instead of reading through it.
After seeing how much has been revealed so far, I've got to say I'm quite pleased with my decition.
( What, what do you mean with "contentless post"?)
..pakbeka.. said:I predict I'll be disappointed tonight
Hardware ranges from $199, and up, generally speaking. All stores are still receiving hardware, but at a slow trickle, and we've found that the best way to get one is to call the stores closest to you, find out when they believe they'll get one in, and then show up that morning -- and show up early, as in, before the store opens. FAO Schwarz usually has the unit, but at $30 more than the MSRP, for $229.
No it wasn't. I'll take a picture of the sticker tonight. I'm sorry folks, but Walmart was not ripping people off.soundwave05 said:N64 was $199.99 US.
If you paid $249.99 US (w/o Mario) you got ripped off.
The N64 dropping to $199.99 is what caused the Playstation to drop in price as well.
Then you got screwed. No Nintendo system ever launched at over $200.Haleon said:No they didn't. I still have my N64 box with a $249.99 sticker on it from Walmart. Somehow I doubt Walmart was price gouging.
Haleon said:No it wasn't. I'll take a picture of the sticker tonight. I'm sorry folks, but Walmart was not ripping people off.
Ristamar said:Then you got screwed. No Nintendo system ever launched at over $200.
Here's another guy that paid 249.99 for itMama Smurf said:Jesus Christ, this isn't gamefaqs, we're not just making shit up like we know what we're talking about.
You got screwed. Plain and simple.
Drinky Crow said:believe![]()
Ark-AMN said:Again I'll ask, does REV need as much power as 360 and PS3 if its not going to do any big HD stuff?
Ark-AMN said:Again I'll ask, does REV need as much power as 360 and PS3 if its not going to do any big HD stuff?
Yeah, that was total damage control. I really don't care what the specs of the Revolution are. I'm just saying that this "news" is nothing to be excited about. The Revolution might be similar to the Xbox in specs, but guess what, I couldn't care less. And I'm pretty sure the Revolution is going to be less powerful than the Xbox 360, so how was my post damage control?Doube D said:damage control in full effect! Nbots unite!
BigGreenMat said:You have to realize that this is a system that still won't release for ~9 months and people are guessing it will be about the same as an Xbox in specs and cost about the same which is ridiculous. First off given that it is a new piece of hardware that was created around the tech and pricing available in a little less than a year it should be able to be FAR more powerful than an Xbox and still cost a similar amount of money. I mean they could easily toss 256MB of non-exotic RAM into the machine with small process/power efficient chips that are MUCH faster than Xbox's chips for about the same price because they are not locked into any contracts and pricing structures that are 4 years old. In fact it would probably cost them MORE to produce memory chips with a lower amount as opposed a greater amount. Seriously there are almost no products that have memory amounts less than 256MB nowadays so it makes no sense that the system would have any less than that unless it is using some weird cutting edge tech RAM that is expensive to produce, but I don't see Rev using anything as relatively new as RDRAM or 1TSRAM this time around.
Oh and lets just do some comparisons on RAM right. N64 to GC was an increase of 10X for RAM. PSX to PS2 was ~12x increase. Xbox to X360 in a very short generation time was an 8X increase. So lets say that the Revolution ends up costing the same at launch as N64 and GC ($200). Given the trends it would point to Revolution having at least 384MB (a good round multiple #) of RAM. Now lets say that the system is less. Well it would still be completely reasonable given that it is coming out almost a year after x360 and won't have such a speed premium that at least 192MB if not 256MB of RAM is attainable at a $99 pricepoint. The low amounts of RAM talked about here are mindboggling.
Haleon said:Here's another guy that paid 249.99 for it
http://www.joystiq.com/entry/1234000407062281/
Search for Nintendo 64.
And no, you don't know what you're talking about. I'll post a picture tonight.
It depends on what you mean by need?Ark-AMN said:Again I'll ask, does REV need as much power as 360 and PS3 if its not going to do any big HD stuff?
UltraMarioMan said:Why is everyone SO convinced Rev will be so underpowered? You guys are nuts. At worst it will be Rev=Xbox360<PS3.
STFU Please, you've be warned before. Don't try to wheasel your way out of admitting defeat by posting pictures that don't prove a goddamned thing.Haleon said:Here's another guy that paid 249.99 for it
http://www.joystiq.com/entry/1234000407062281/
Search for Nintendo 64.
And no, you don't know what you're talking about. I'll post a picture tonight.