• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The Most Important Global Issues of the Next 35 Years

Status
Not open for further replies.
What do you think they are? I mean, I don't know. But here's my best guess.

Shale and the American Energy Revolution
In 2012, America started exporting more oil than it imported, and now America has passed Russia as the largest exporter of natural gas. Launching onto the global market with cheap crude, America has essentially caused OPEC to declare economic war on us and try to force us out of the market. Some say that the dramatic drop in oil prices is one of the most important factors in the slowing global economy, while others insist that the dropping oil prices are actually a symptom of the slowdown, but regardless of the chicken-and-egg thought experiment, dramatically decreasing revenues will have massive ramifications on global politics and developing nations.

Russia is in an economic state almost as bad as the last time global trends reached a calamitous tenor in 1997 and caused it to default on its debt, which will have an unknown effect on its aggressive, nationalist political atmosphere and posturing.

Iran, which has been modernizing and ceding concessions to global political leaders on the promise that oil sales will finally bring prosperity to the hammered theocracy, now faces a barrel price that is half of what it had expected it would be, partially because of a belligerent Saudi Arabia fighting yet another battle to gain regional Sunni hegemony in the Middle East. Will shattered dreams dismantle Iranian modernization? How will nations dependent on oil profits respond to decreased revenues in the region? Thomas Picketty said the Middle East had the worst income inequality in the world and that is the primary reason for terrorism and instability. Will this destabilize the region further, after a failed Arab Spring has left temperamental dictatorships in ruins?

Africa
Nigeria is on track to have a trillion dollar economy by 2030, which will place it 17th in the world economy. And somehow, despite oil accounting for 2/3 of its government revenue, low costs of drilling and development mean that Nigeria can still remain profitable and will weather the storm far better than other nations. It is mostly probable that within 30 years, American politicians will be talking about whether we have a strong enough presence in Africa.

The (Real) Pivot to Asia
Despite an American obsession with the Middle East that's been around for three decades and topics like ISIS, Syria, and Iran dominating foreign policy debates in Western countries, the United States is finally pivoting to Asia (where most of the most important geopolitical developments will occur for the next few decades) by solidifying a trade deal more important than NAFTA with Pacific rim nations and committing strategically and militarily to its allies in the region. Re-establishing its Navy base in Subic Bay, Philippines, establishing relationships with emerging economies like Jakarta, and becoming even more engaged with a changing Tokyo is situating the United States to be firmly present for Asian politics. While strategically aligning itself against Beijing interests in the South China Sea may make it seem like the United States should be aggressive and unfriendly with China, the reality is that most Asian nations will want to have very good relationships with both Beijing and Washington, and China will be the "most complex relationship we will ever have".

Climate Change
The thing that makes climate change so unique is that it is simultaneously the most pressing threat to human existence and also predominantly manufactured by human activity. From mass extinction of species, to increased conflict in third world nations, we as a species have to make dramatic changes to all of human society or we threaten our entire survival. Catastrophic and apocalyptic predictions as soon as 200 years from now are hardly a stretch of the imagination and will surely be the most pressing issue of the far future, if we don't act in the near future. The Paris Climate Talks, also known as COP 21, is the first real commitment by the United States (the leader in carbon emissions) to reduce its carbon footprint and work with other nations to make dramatic cuts to emissions by key dates. But with the advent of cheap non-renewable energy becoming a normality for decades and the persistence of coal companies fighting solar power tooth-and-nail, renewable energy sources will constantly be in conflict with traditional energy until renewable energy is irrefutably cheaper than petroleum and natural gas.

Environmental Protection
The environment is actually a distinct issue from the climate. The explosive growth of the developing world will put one question on everyone's minds: wtf are we going to do with all that trash? If China is any indicator, industrialization in the 21st century is a very dirty, very unhealthy process, and will happen at speeds unprecedented in human history.

Species are undergoing mass extinction for reasons other than climate change. Sustainable agriculture is the exception, not the rule. Over half of all ocean ecosystems are either collapsing or in danger of ecological collapse. In fact, there are some estimates thatall large fish in the ocean could be wiped out by the year 2050 if sustainable fishing practices are not achieved soon. Yeah. That is the extent of our overconsumption of ocean resources.

Gene Engineering of Human Beings
The UK just gave scientists the right to experiment with gene editing of human embryos. GATTACA comparisons aside, we simultaneously have the potential to live in a society where literally no human being is born with genetic defects, but also huge mistakes have the potential to be made and unknown consequences will ensue in the manipulation of a largely chaotic system sensitive to small changes. These are the very same risks that currently apply to the genetic modification of produce and livestock, so scientists are well aware of it.

This has the huge potential of dramatically altering human society. The possibilities are both endless and unfathomable for me. I don't even know what will happen because of it, but it will be big. And the changes will come fast.

Okay, that's my list. What didn't make it on my list?

- Space. Elon Musk might have made one huge step in advancing human technology by accomplishing a reusable rocket landing (from orbit, suck it Jeff Bezos), but humans will not see the value of increasing funding for space exploration due to the intangibility of things like asteroid deflections, and settling Mars. Would love to be proved wrong.

- Global terrorism. Boko Haram and al Shebab will likely terrorize central Africa for maybe two or more decades, but the global terrorism will probably decrease or become widely irrelevant as the U.S. pivot to Asia leads to less resentment in the Middle East towards the West and terrorism becomes just another component to regional conflicts which will not end anytime soon.

- Privacy and the age of spying. In a world where it becomes impossible to not have a digital footprint, the amount of rights that the average person will lose related to digital privacy will nearly vanish but most people will be complacent because it will just be an automated and unnoticeable function of artificial intelligence networks operated by secret government agencies. Good or bad, that's just how it is, and has been.
 

Darren870

Member
Depends where you are. Here in the UK I doubt water is going to be a problem any time soon, but it will definitely be a problem state side.

Until companies start buying land and claiming the water as theres and selling it overseas or using it for shit products.

I mean it's not they've done that before.... Oh wait they do it all the time!

Edit: It actually pisses me off when people buy bottled water because they don't want to drink from the tap in countries where tap water is perfectly safe.
 

Nikodemos

Member
The trash problem will not be solved until the day we implement deep recycling, a.k.a. molecular dismantling.

Unfortunately, deep recycling needs a roughly three-fold increase in continuous/constant energy generation compared to what we have today (it's extremely energy-intensive, both electrical and thermal). It's fair to say that recent 'downpower/powerdown' initiatives haven't been merely misguided, but actually harmful towards achieving this goal.
 
Changes in energy will be very important. But American shale will only be a parenthesis. This is the most important change:

NlOyhqT.jpg


Numbers for wind energy are great as well, even if the change is not quite as impressively fast
 

Nikodemos

Member
Can you elaborate on this? I've never heard of this before.
Basically energy efficiency coupled with shutting down powerplants. "Use less energy so we may produce less energy" rather than "use less energy so that we may do something else with that energy". It's an unfortunate side-effect of lumping power generation and energy (chiefly electricity but not only) along with (other) public utilities rather than economic goods. It's a mental imagery thing: when you create an economic good, you'll try to sell it to others, or use it to create higher plusvalue economic goods, before stopping production. A public utility gets upsized or downsized based on factors other than pure economic calculations (politics, social trends etc.).
 

soco

Member
algorithmic shaping and prejudice

we've got some amazingly complex algorithms doing everything from security trading, crime prediction, and information shaping. As facebook shapes your feeds, what information are you missing? Does your sad or depressed friends get attention they need? As google routes you around the city to avoid traffic, they're also moving money around by places you might stop, what places miss that money? How do the ordering of their results change your view of the world? As we use social media like Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and Periscope in crisis events, what information is getting preferenced? Netflix and others try to predict what you might like, but how quickly do they get into feedback loops where you never get shows that surprise you?


We're training a lot of algorithms on biased datasets. If there are subtle prejudices in here, how much of that do the algorithms pick up? Are we going to pick up hints of racism in translation results? Are we going to create new prejudices through these algorithms? If we start predicting crime in areas and send extra police to those areas, chances are we'll probably also find more crime. How will this shape public reaction?

We're tossing huge amounts of data at learning algorithms and don't know what we're getting. What sort of hidden biases are in these and how will they affect us? Our metrics are pretty simplistic for some of these.
 
What happened in 2008?
I think there was a small bubble in the solar tech market around 2007 and 2008.

Basically energy efficiency coupled with shutting down powerplants. "Use less energy so we may produce less energy" rather than "use less energy so that we may do something else with that energy". It's an unfortunate side-effect of lumping power generation and energy (chiefly electricity but not only) along with (other) public utilities rather than economic goods. It's a mental imagery thing: when you create an economic good, you'll try to sell it to others, or use it to create higher plusvalue economic goods, before stopping production. A public utility gets upsized or downsized based on factors other than pure economic calculations (politics, social trends etc.).
Oh, I see what you're saying. Ultimately producing less energy is important in combating climate change, so I think that's a fair trade off. Maybe the route to go is more investment in recyclable consumer products and then have a very long term plan for existing human waste.

OP is too focused on the US POV
I'm from the US, so that was inevitable. I even had to delete phrases like "in this country"! I tried to be global but opposing viewpoints from other countries would be welcome. After all, this is a post-America world (thanks Fareed).

Changes in energy will be very important. But American shale will only be a parenthesis. This is the most important change:

NlOyhqT.jpg


Numbers for wind energy are great as well, even if the change is not quite as impressively fast
I disagree. While the richest nations will soon transition dramatically to solar, wind, and nuclear, natural gas and petroleum will dominate the energy sources for most of the world for at least the first half of the 20th century, and probably longer, because it will always be cheapest and renewable energy tech requires a capital investment that isn't necessarily present in all countries.
 

Nelo Ice

Banned
Until companies start buying land and claiming the water as theres and selling it overseas or using it for shit products.

I mean it's not they've done that before.... Oh wait they do it all the time!

Edit: It actually pisses me off when people buy bottled water because they don't want to drink from the tap in countries where tap water is perfectly safe.

I know how you feel. My sister and her boyfriend refuse to drink the tap water since apparently it doesn't taste good so we always waste money on bottled water. While I'm the only one that drinks water from the tap. It's like it's water, what do you expect it to taste like?!.
 

Darren870

Member
I know how you feel. My sister and her boyfriend refuse to drink the tap water since apparently it doesn't taste good so we always waste money on bottled water. While I'm the only one that drinks water from the tap. It's like it's water, what do you expect it to taste like?!.

I just don't understand the mentality of it. I've had people say the water here doesn't taste good (Australia).... Doesn't taste good? WTF are you talking about? Get used to it then..if it doesn't taste good.

Otherwise you:
Contribute to landfills with all the waste of plastic bottles
Contribute to the pockets of these companies who think water isn't a human right
Contribute to foodmiles (watermiles?) wasted to get you your precious bottled water
Contribute to drought places where water is stolen
Waste your hard earned money.

I actually travel with a UV pen now. When I go to countries where they say the water isn't safe I fill my bottle up from the tap, blast it with UV, and drink away. Save money and don't throw more plastic into the garbage in countries that have no idea what to do with it.

Though that water sometimes taste like proper shit...haha. I prefer a stream to a tap in some places.
 

Famassu

Member
Of course environmental problems will be the worst ones because most of it will be irreplaceable/something we have no ability to fix (at most we can try to lessen the harm caused, but not negate it altogether), not only because of the damage we are causing the environment but also because those can be root-causes for non-environmental problems as a side-effect.


bill1148 said:
Gene engineering is interesting. Could care less about the rest.
Pathetic.
 

Madness

Member
Fresh water.

You'll have to pry it from our cold dead hands in Canada. It's liquid gold, the real resource of the future, and we have a lot of it. But even now, companies like Nestlé are paying pennies to bottle up millions of liters of taxpayer funded spring water and sell it. Won't be long until all the top beverage corporations buy up aquifers and springs.

I think the most important global change of the future is the decline of the West on an economical and military scale. For the first time in centuries, a European/Western country will not dominate the globe. In ten years, the US ceases to be the sole economic superpower and China's economy will grow to the size that they could single handedly sanction Germany if they wanted to, and every other country would have to accept it since they're the world's largest exporter and the largest trading partner for several countries.
 
Automation is going to be huge. Yes you have had people decrying it for the past 50 years, but they were just the early people and this is a different type of automation. With our technology at the level it is, and with it increasing at an exponential rate we are sitting right on the plateau of a huge societal change.

Just looking at self driving cars alone, that will wreak havoc on employment as suddenly all of our truck drivers, all of our taxi drivers, our local delivery drivers and anybody who has driving as a huge portion of their job requirements will all be replaced by self driving cars that companies would only have to pay maintenance and fuel for.

This is a good video on the subject https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Pq-S557XQU
 
I think the most important global change of the future is the decline of the West on an economical and military scale. For the first time in centuries, a European/Western country will not dominate the globe. In ten years, the US ceases to be the sole economic superpower and China's economy will grow to the size that they could single handedly sanction Germany if they wanted to, and every other country would have to accept it since they're the world's largest exporter and the largest trading partner for several countries.
200808-post-american-world-fareed-zakaria.jpg


Have I got a book for you!


I did not appropriately discuss genetic engineering's implications in medical treatment. I apologize.
 

Kas

Member
algorithmic shaping and prejudice

we've got some amazingly complex algorithms doing everything from security trading, crime prediction, and information shaping. As facebook shapes your feeds, what information are you missing? Does your sad or depressed friends get attention they need? As google routes you around the city to avoid traffic, they're also moving money around by places you might stop, what places miss that money? How do the ordering of their results change your view of the world? As we use social media like Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and Periscope in crisis events, what information is getting preferenced? Netflix and others try to predict what you might like, but how quickly do they get into feedback loops where you never get shows that surprise you?


We're training a lot of algorithms on biased datasets. If there are subtle prejudices in here, how much of that do the algorithms pick up? Are we going to pick up hints of racism in translation results? Are we going to create new prejudices through these algorithms? If we start predicting crime in areas and send extra police to those areas, chances are we'll probably also find more crime. How will this shape public reaction?

We're tossing huge amounts of data at learning algorithms and don't know what we're getting. What sort of hidden biases are in these and how will they affect us? Our metrics are pretty simplistic for some of these.

This is something I've never considered, and I'm shocked I never did. The tech we use is only as good as the people who make and program it, but people are infallible or are just human.
 
By the end of that period, 2051, it's gotta be Artificial Intelligence. An issue that isn't just important, it's existentially necessary to deal with correctly, and it can have the biggest positive impact on society if it turns out well. There are related sub-issues on that path too, namely the impact that increasing automation can have on the viability of conventional capitalist societies.
 

Sadsic

Member
(im american)

- Population busts in the first world buoyed by immigration in some countries, but eating other countries alive

- The end of America as the world police and the beginning of 21st century geopolitics

- The end of the petrodollar for better or worse

- The end or beginning of true oligarchy in America

- CRISPR en masse

- Ending aging
 
The Dawn of Post-Labor: Computers aren't like past disruption technologies. They don't just simulate human skill, but also the human minds. Day by day more and more cashiers and clerks are being replaced by computers, 3D printers are replacing factory workers, various apps are replacing professionals, etc. This won't lead to a complete unemployment in 35 years, but it will make a significant dent in employment that people will have to figure out how to handle.

Further Evolution of the Economic Model: Inequality is becoming higher and higher. Debt is climbing higher and higher. Growth is slowing down. People need to find an alternative model to what we have. The problem is there are no immediate answers. Nations that tried fighting and in many respects improved inequality, such as a fair share of nations in Latin America, resulted in their growth stunted due to various regulations in curbing the growth. In contrast many Western nations over the past thirty years have had the focus of inequality take the back seat while they put more of a focus on growth and reducing debt only to have the growth go into the hands of the few and having debt still climb up. Fight inequality and your nation is less competitive which results in less wealth. Focus on competitiveness and inequality grows as things become a race to the bottom. This is an issue that nations need to solve in trying to find the next economic model. NOTE: This is from the perspective of developed nations.

By the end of that period, 2051, it's gotta be Artificial Intelligence. An issue that isn't just important, it's existentially necessary to deal with correctly, and it can have the biggest positive impact on society if it turns out well. There are related sub-issues on that path too, namely the impact that increasing automation can have on the viability of conventional capitalist societies.

I wonder if AI will lead to the near end of democracy. With an all knowing A.I. being doing everything for us in some sort of benevolent totalitarian society (at least economically)?
 

jufonuk

not tag worthy
Gene engineering is interesting. Could care less about the rest.
So you do care

I think it will be , global warming and pretty much what we are dealing with now.
But the ethical issues that Gene tampering will bring up are going to be interesting , imagine a younger generation smarter, stronger more superior to us ? Aargh .. Combat them with more social media and memes. As the fail safe is they are more self absorbed and narcissistic until a later age when they are more mature with their abilities.
 

curls

Wake up Sheeple, your boring insistence that Obama is not a lizardman from Atlantis is wearing on my patience 💤
AI is a bad thing. You will never control it.
 

Log4Girlz

Member
(im american)

- Population busts in the first world buoyed by immigration in some countries, but eating other countries alive

- The end of America as the world police and the beginning of 21st century geopolitics

- The end of the petrodollar for better or worse

- The end or beginning of true oligarchy in America

- CRISPR en masse

- Ending aging

Pff our robots will continue policing duties on the world scale
 
Overpopulation.

Global fertility rate is shrinking every year. Last year it was 2.36 and 2.1 is the replacement level fertility rate. Especially western countries will have underpopulation problems pretty soon and whole world will follow in couple of decades.
 
AI is a bad thing. You will never control it.

Only the rich and gun nuts fear the power of an ASI! I, for one, welcome our new benevolent ruler...
if you read this and I'm still alive, I was always on your side, please don't kill me!
 
Those saying population have nothing to worry about. The population is projected to stop growing after around 2050. As countries become industrialized, their populations decline.

I'm horrified about the UK GATTACA thing, though. It's going to be like those Pretties and Uglies novels. :(
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom