Which game would be a good 'middle-step' to prepare for AH's playstyle if I can find interested people?
Nice! I need to try a few of those!AstroLad said:Added the co-op section and some other new stuff to the OP (updates will be spelled out in first line as now).
Glad people are enjoying the thread!
Suairyu said:Oh, Arkham Horror sounds like the kind of thing myself and a few of my friends might enjoy regularly. Shall have to work with your game progression system to see if my friends would go for board game play first, especially considering AH's price and complexity.
Generally I think that might be true, but I learned my lesson with Race for the Galaxy one too many times. ALWAYS TEACH SAN JUAN FIRSTBrashnir said:At the end of the day, learning a moderately-complicated game and then transitioning to a complicated game is still more work than just learning the complicated game to begin with. The nice thing about Arkham is that it's fully playable solo, so you can play a few games by yourself before trying to teach it to new people.
AstroLad said:Generally I think that might be true, but I learned my lesson with Race for the Galaxy one too many times. ALWAYS TEACH SAN JUAN FIRST
Suairyu said:All of us would be inexperienced with 'modern' (wikipedia presents the term 'German-style', if you're looking for a new term) boardgames, bar the hours I poured into XBLA Catan back when you could still find a game online. Taking a look at Pandemic, that seems fun, so I'll probably use that to bridge the gap in complexity and play style.
Hm, taking a look at Carcassonne now. Also looks like a fun entry game and runs about £10 cheaper than Catan. Choices, choices.
Do it. I can still play Catan but it's not something I get too excited for. It's a fantastic gateway game, but among all the gateways listed, it's probably the one that wears the fastest on me. Then again I remember at PAX East there were like 100 people playing a Catan tournament so your friends certainly aren't the exception.StoOgE said:I'm actually having a game night this week. I think Pandemic and Small World are both on the table. This is a group that usually only plays Catan because they love it and don't like to venture out into anything else.
AstroLad said:JuDo it. I can still play Catan but it's not something I get too excited for. It's a fantastic gateway game, but among all the gateways listed, it's probably the one that wears the fastest on me. Then again I remember at PAX East there were like 100 people playing a Catan tournament so your friends certainly aren't the exception.
It's not so much a complexity thing (though that is a factor), but also that none of my friends or even myself have regularly played boardgames or pnp roleplaying games before. I guess the progression would be more one of involvement and style of play - Carcassone and Catan, whilst downplaying the luck element in favour of strategy, seem closest to the 'classic' boardgames that near enough everyone universally understands.Brashnir said:I don't think there's really a "progression," so much as a guide for simpler games good for getting people into playing who might nor be into complexity.
Yep if anyone is looking for a super-light wargame, easily a wargame you can play with a wife or non-gamer friend, this is a great one imo. Play it a couple times a month with my wife. Didn't include it in the original Games for Couples list though just because of the theme.I also think I might sell my copy of Memoir 44 if anyone is interested in it. It isn't a bad game at all, it just really isn't my cup of tea. I like more balanced games with minimal luck. I find the whole C&C system to be too luck based and the maps lend themselves to one player being the underdog.
Suairyu said:It's really more about seeing if I can round up some friends into regular boardgaming first - then using a cooperative 'middle-step' like Pandemic to see if that sort of game suits their fancies - before I drop a larger sum of money on Arkham Horror, which right now seems to be going for more than £40 on Amazon.
XiaNaphryz said:If you're going to put up a co-op section, Fury of Dracula needs to be there. ;P
One of the first things I already mentioned, just adding to the queue. Pay attention!StoOgE said:Look, one fight at a time.
We need to get Power Grid off of the runner-up list first, then you can worry about whatever silly little games you prefer.![]()
Yeah was having this discussion on BGG, where it always degrades to "board games and video games are basically the same!" I just think as a general matter, board games inherently have way more shelf life. Anyone still playing 20-year-old copies of Scrabble can attest to this, but it's true for modern games as well. People play Ticket to Ride, Carcassonne, and Catan years after they've "moved on" to other games (if they've chosen to do so). The hobby certainly does lend itself to OMG DAY ONE "flavor of the month" people who can spend in ways similar to avid video-game buyers, but the games themselves are generally far more timeless imo.BattleMonkey said:Don't worry, board gaming is relatively cheap compared to most hobbies, and you get lot of mileage out of a single game usually. Only gets bad if you blindly just go around buying every board game you can find and trying to buy rare out of print stuff constantly.
AstroLad said:Yeah was having this discussion on BGG, where it always degrades to "board games and video games are basically the same!" I just think as a general matter, board games inherently have way more shelf life. Anyone still playing 20-year-old copies of Scrabble can attest to this, but it's true for modern games as well. People play Ticket to Ride, Carcassonne, and Catan years after they've "moved on" to other games (if they've chosen to do so). The hobby certainly does lend itself to OMG DAY ONE "flavor of the month" people who can spend in ways similar to avid video-game buyers, but the games themselves are generally far more timeless imo.
I usually read the rules and seek out video reviews of board games I'm interested. If I get one that's a dud I actually had success trading them online at BGG.BattleMonkey said:The one negative of board games is that you often can't try before buying, though rules for most games are found online anyways which makes a decent "preview"
BattleMonkey said:Don't worry, board gaming is relatively cheap compared to most hobbies, and you get lot of mileage out of a single game usually. Only gets bad if you blindly just go around buying every board game you can find and trying to buy rare out of print stuff constantly.
BattleMonkey said:I need to get on BGG market and such, got bunch of stuff like the World of Warcraft board game and sealed extra copy of Memoir 44 to get rid of. Ebay is not cutting it for board games, keep feeling ripped off for what some stuff sells for if it's not rare.
crowphoenix said:So, Gaf, I've got no one to really play games with, but I'm considering trying to get a few people interested. What would be a few good gateway games for 2-6 people? Besides, Catan, which I plan to buy even if I have to play by myself.
True, unless you start going into party-game country. That's probably the next section that will go into the OP, but check out Time's Up, Wits & Wagers, and Say Anything. RoboRally also plays great with 6 and is more of a "real" game.StoOgE said:6 is difficult..
AstroLad said:True, unless you start going into party-game country. That's probably the next section that will go into the OP, but check out Time's Up, Wits & Wagers, and Say Anything. RoboRally also plays great with 6 and is more of a "real" game.
I'm going to need it for my own reference :lol. Going to bgg.con with my wife and two friends so we'll have a roving group of four and meeting up with gaffers and just random people I'm sure we'll have a great need for 6+.StoOgE said:I think that would be a good section. That is one of the hardest parts of board game night. I have to invite 6-7 people hoping 4 will actually come. Then you wind up with too many people coming.
AstroLad said:I'm going to need it for my own reference :lol. Going to bgg.con with my wife and two friends so we'll have a roving group of four and meeting up with gaffers and just random people I'm sure we'll have a great need for 6+.
Almost forgot to mention Citadels too! (Which we played over the weekend, very fun (non-party) game imo that plays up to 8 and is quite cheap.)
Yep yep. I think at least 3-4 other gaffers are going too. My brother-in-law wanted to join us but tickets sold out like three months ago and there's a big waiting list now. We just bought out plane tickets this weekend. Four days of nonstop boardgaming *drool*StoOgE said:In Dallas?
I almost went to that this year.
6 actually isn't that bad, it's 7 or higher where you start seeing more issues. My post earlier in thread covers some suggestions, for specific gateway stuff that goes up to 6 I'd suggest Saboteur, Slide 5, Winner's Circle (play with hidden bets), or Alhambra.StoOgE said:Though, it should be noted that the most any of these games go to is 4-5 players. 6 is difficult..
AstroLad said:Yep yep. I think at least 3-4 other gaffers are going too. My brother-in-law wanted to join us but tickets sold out like three months ago and there's a big waiting list now. We just bought out plane tickets this weekend. Four days of nonstop boardgaming *drool*