PauloRoberto
Member
It depends...
If we compare about 'what could have be' and the reality, it's Microsoft, because a company with so much money should have a extremely better output, and that is not the case (not surprising if we remember how Windows feels worse since Windows 8, at least [and i was a beta tester of Windows 7, when this would represent something]). Today, only idiots still defend MS - includingo some users from NeoGaf.
If we compare about the reality and imagination world that a company is living, it's Ubisoft, and that is not even a context. This shitty company still think they show all the others about how a game is created and shields it self using polemics and politics, meanwhile, all its games are on nose-drive trajectory in quality and storytelling - hell, Salai from AC Brotherhood DLC is more charismatic than almost any one NPC form any other AC Game... (Da vinci is more charismatic than almost any other NPC form any other AC game combined!).
If we compare about 'what could have be' and the reality, it's Microsoft, because a company with so much money should have a extremely better output, and that is not the case (not surprising if we remember how Windows feels worse since Windows 8, at least [and i was a beta tester of Windows 7, when this would represent something]). Today, only idiots still defend MS - includingo some users from NeoGaf.
If we compare about the reality and imagination world that a company is living, it's Ubisoft, and that is not even a context. This shitty company still think they show all the others about how a game is created and shields it self using polemics and politics, meanwhile, all its games are on nose-drive trajectory in quality and storytelling - hell, Salai from AC Brotherhood DLC is more charismatic than almost any one NPC form any other AC Game... (Da vinci is more charismatic than almost any other NPC form any other AC game combined!).