Come on, that first example is hyperbole. Millions of European teens did not spontaneously burst into flames whenever they saw tits on TV or in a newspaper stand, just because they didn't have nearly as difficult a time accessing nudity or sexual content as their North American peers. Not all European countries are exactly the same, and U.S. influence has actually made Europe more restrictive in recent years than in decades past (see the United Kingdom's actions right now), but they do tend to have a culture that is far less ashamed of exposure to nudity in media and public spaces than the U.S. Which is arguably healthier for everyone, in the long run, rather than defending an excessively prohibitionist and restrictive view.
The problem is they don't want to merely add hoops for children and nothing else. They're also adding hoops for actual adults and making it harder for sexual content websites to run their business, both financially and technologically. It's not a good faith effort. These are anti-porn extremists who, while shielding their efforts with the same old tired "think of the children" rhetoric, are ultimately hardline puritans.
