There is no Epstein Client List

Maybe they were around from the previous admin or not doing enough. It's quite possible with the higher budget that things need to change there as well. Who knows

They no longer HAVE a budget. And Biden didn't change EVERYONE from the previous Trump administration. Most government jobs are not partisan. They go after human trafficking... You just have to want justice.

If they aren't doing a good job, you don't basically shutter the whole dept.
 
They no longer HAVE a budget. And Biden didn't change EVERYONE from the previous Trump administration. Most government jobs are not partisan. They go after human trafficking... You just have to want justice.

If they aren't doing a good job, you don't basically shutter the whole dept.
The timing certainly is bad, but who knows when it was scheduled. Could have been bloated. The most detailed explanation is here. From what I can tell they coordinate with local operations but mostly look at international problems or other countries. Given the current situation, even if they wanted to focus more on domestic trafficking, a lot of it has international roots... Seems terrible to me
 
Last edited:

He was shook to the core that there is no Epstein list

Reading that. I worry for the man's life.

That's a strong reaction for a list that we were told doesn't exist just a few days ago.
So the Daily Mail just shows itself to be an ass of a publication. What Bongino said was not at all in reference to the Epstein fiasco.



This is likely in relation to the Russiagate stuff Gabbard was peddling before.

Like Epstein's lawyer.

What a coincidence the lawyer died.

He sends them to shut him up in the other world.
His lawyer (not including others like Dershowitz) was 80 years old.
 
Last edited:
They no longer HAVE a budget. And Biden didn't change EVERYONE from the previous Trump administration. Most government jobs are not partisan. They go after human trafficking... You just have to want justice.

If they aren't doing a good job, you don't basically shutter the whole dept.
You know why he did that.
 
So the Daily Mail just shows itself to be an ass of a publication. What Bongino said was not at all in reference to the Epstein fiasco.



This is likely in relation to the Russiagate stuff Gabbard was peddling before.


His lawyer (not including others like Dershowitz) was 80 years old.

It's understandable, but what a coincidence that he "died" in a week of great controversy... Or they sent him to die.

It's like the DEA, which are experts in fabricating crimes.
 
So if she helps bag 5-10 guys, but NOT Trump, then half of y'all would be like, "fuck her, let her rot and those 5-10 guys can stay free if trump ain't in jail with them". That's TDS in a nutshell.
No - I think most people just want to see the bad guys brought to justice. This all started with a push by Trump supporters and Trump, most of us had just accepted that the rich and powerful would get off scott free like usual. But then we had a push by Trump and his administration and actual (fairly useless) files released. It was only when Trump did a complete u-turn and started acting kinda crazy defending not releasing anything more that anyone thought he was anything more than implicated in passing.
 
No - I think most people just want to see the bad guys brought to justice. This all started with a push by Trump supporters and Trump, most of us had just accepted that the rich and powerful would get off scott free like usual. But then we had a push by Trump and his administration and actual (fairly useless) files released. It was only when Trump did a complete u-turn and started acting kinda crazy defending not releasing anything more that anyone thought he was anything more than implicated in passing.
Not to mention most people that hate trump don't really care about this Epstein fiasco. They think his supporters are dumb for believing Trump would release anything, and this whole "Epstein list" was just a conspiratorial dead end to begin with.
 
Not to mention most people that hate trump don't really care about this Epstein fiasco. They think his supporters are dumb for believing Trump would release anything, and this whole "Epstein list" was just a conspiratorial dead end to begin with.
and Trump has ironically, by his own actions, made both of those realities possible.

If there's not a list, hes been lying every time he campaigned on it and so have his constituents. If there is a list, they are all lying about it now and covering up one of the biggest scandals in American history.

Either one doesn't look good on him.
 
Donald Trump orders US attorney general to 'produce' more Epstein documents - BBC News https://share.google/X5LSDnWMx5bcDmrIh

As many people noted the day this was announced:

"Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval," he said.

That could mean anything if Trump is the one determining what is "pertinent" and what isn't. If he were really taking this seriously, he would let Pam Bondi appoint a special council and select someone who's a known boy scout type figure, who has no connection to Trump or anyone in his orbit. But of course he's not going to let that happen.
 

'never had the privilege to go to a pedo island.'

simon cowell facepalm GIF
 
So either:
  • The bit about him not going is true. (doubt)
  • He's lying, but feels he's got enough control over the flow of information that he can control the narrative.

I am leaning towards the second tbh. I am hoping for the first one but honestly the shit he said in the past and dodgy behaviour now does not do him any favours
 

She's saying that she was given immunity, and the government renegged on it.

Who the fuck offers pedos immunity? She not only took part in threesomes involving minors but also actively procured those little girls for Epstein. There are dozens of women accusing her of this. Why would anyone offer her immunity AFTER Epstein died?

Unless of course she was working for CIA.
 
She's saying that she was given immunity, and the government renegged on it.

Who the fuck offers pedos immunity? She not only took part in threesomes involving minors but also actively procured those little girls for Epstein. There are dozens of women accusing her of this. Why would anyone offer her immunity AFTER Epstein died?

Unless of course she was working for CIA.

There's no need to bring the CIA into this equation at all.

This just looks like Trump is trying to bribe her into saying he never did anything wrong with a pardon. She can name some other names to give MAGA some read meat they've been hungry for, say Trump didn't do anything bad, and she gets a pardon.

Trump then attempts to control the release of any other information the government has and anything that leaks out that can be denied, he says it's all fake, witchhunt, Obama/Hillary/Biden, etc.

He just needs to get some additional information out there so MAGA will stop foaming at the mouth, but present it in a way that will let them convince themselves he's not part of the pedophile ring. That's the endzone he's trying to get to.
 
So either:
  • The bit about him not going is true. (doubt)
  • He's lying, but feels he's got enough control over the flow of information that he can control the narrative.
So confused where the concept of him attending the island is even coming from. He's known to be on flight lists, because he's used the planes previously. He was previously associated with Epstein before they had a falling out - perhaps even being involved in flipping him to the government investigators in the late 2000s for related materials. Even if you look at Virginia's testimony - she effectively exonerates Trump, at least in terms of anything she was directly involved in. This kind of information is from whence my present leaning comes.

Is Trump innocent of the more dire entanglements of Epstein? Personally, I think so. We won't know, of course, until the data is out. I'd like to see all the data.

Do you think anyone in this thread would somehow blink if Clinton was involved?

From those leaks during the initial investigation years back, Clinton appeared to be a frequent flyer.
 
Last edited:
From those leaks during the initial investigation years back, Clinton appeared to be a frequent flyer.
Exactly. Like it's a known fact that Clinton will show up in those files. Would be interesting to see if they do show him going to that Island.

Wanting pedophiles to face justice shouldn't be a partisan issue.
 
aByorMx_700bwp.webp





I had the misfortune of scanning through her twitter feed but while this particular tweet has been deleted, there are enough replies with pictures of it to know that she really did post that second tweet.
 
So confused where the concept of him attending the island is even coming from. He's known to be on flight lists, because he's used the planes previously. He was previously associated with Epstein before they had a falling out - perhaps even being involved in flipping him to the government investigators in the late 2000s for related materials. Even if you look at Virginia's testimony - she effectively exonerates Trump, at least in terms of anything she was directly involved in. This kind of information is from whence my present leaning comes.

Is Trump innocent of the more dire entanglements of Epstein? Personally, I think so. We won't know, of course, until the data is out. I'd like to see all the data.



From those leaks during the initial investigation years back, Clinton appeared to be a frequent flyer.
You'll never see the data. All we will ever have is mounting circumstantial evidence that all point to Trump's socalled "more dire entanglements" with Epstein that ends with him pardoning a pedophile and child sex trafficker. You can't really fan fiction your way out of this one.
 
Top Bottom