demon said:I can NEVER get earbuds to stay in my ears. Pisses me off. Otherwise I'd pick up some nice ones.
quadriplegicjon said:i want sex in my ear.
i thought better headphones would make the ipod sound better??? maybe you should rip the songs at a better bit rate?
The kind of earphones i've always wanted! btw, how much?Suerte said:They're great, you can pretty much block out ALL the sound around you without having to put the volume up too high.
SnowWolf said:As someone mentioned, the drawback to getting quality headphones is that the iPod sounds like crap :lol. If sound quality matters to you, go with the iRivers![]()
Yeah, not earing any sounds around you, when the volume is even not at is maximum, it might be troublesome.GG-Duo said:These are "in-ear" phones, though.
So you wouldn't be able to use them in a work or street sort of environment. Can you imagine taking out a waxed-up pair of earphones while shopping? That's pretty much my biggest concern.
Willco said:I don't know what the hell they're called, but they are these earbuds made by Sony. I normally hate earbuds, but they've got like some kind of rubber/silcon thing for your ears and - by god! - they are so goddamn comfortable.
Sound pretty good too.
Great King Bowser said:God damnit why was no one aware of my pimping of Shure e2Cs?
I bought the EX71SLs before my Shures and in the end realised I should have bypassed them altogether and saved myself some money. The sound quality of Shures > Sony's aritficial bass and crappy treble anyday. You can get a pair of E2cs for like $65 as far as I'm aware in the States. I paid £50 for mine for christ's sake. GO GO GO.
Great King Bowser said:God damnit why was no one aware of my pimping of Shure e2Cs?
I bought the EX71SLs before my Shures and in the end realised I should have bypassed them altogether and saved myself some money. The sound quality of Shures > Sony's aritficial bass and crappy treble anyday. You can get a pair of E2cs for like $65 as far as I'm aware in the States. I paid £50 for mine for christ's sake. GO GO GO.
Fixed2BeBroken said:earbuds are bad for your ears by the way.
loxy said:Care to explain?
COCKLES said:Bowser my man...are they that good? I was tempted to buy a pair today in Tot Court Road for my Archos? (using a pair of £15 quid Toshibas at the moment...which already shit over the pack-ins).
Alright, I wanna do some whoring for the Koss KSC line, soo... I hope you're not using those big honkers for portable use. You should consider the KSC35/75s. THey use the same driver and are only $15(amazon)! They are clip-ons and sound absolutely incredible. Rivals even the Grado SR60s. Also, from what I've read, the Sony EX series has terrible boomy bass and screeching highs. Which is quite dissapointing. I would second Bowser's recommendation.whytemyke said:I got some big ol' Koss UR-20 headphones a few years ago. I'm still using them, and they're by far the best headphones i've ever purchased. only 30 bucks, too.
though I'm considering getting some of those surround sound headphones. those'd rule, if I had the dough to drop on 'em.
i love shopping while listening to music using earphones (Sony EX71SLs here), especially when shopping at Walmart. Granted, it means a loss of awareness, but it literally makes you feel like you're in another world when listening to music with earphones.GG-Duo said:These are "in-ear" phones, though.
So you wouldn't be able to use them in a work or street sort of environment.
Also, can you imagine taking out a waxed-up pair of earphones while shopping? That's pretty much my biggest concern.
they're for any monitoring situation. musicians use them as personal monitors during live performances as well. they make perfect sense for recreational use because noise pollution from outside a playback device degrades the quality of the sound heard by the recreational listener, not to mention listeners tend to not turn up the intensity of a playback device if the earphones provide isolation, which reduces the overall intensity the ear sees, which is kinder on the inner ear.Fixed2BeBroken said:isolated headphones are mostly for recording purposes (so sound doesnt leak into mic signal)...i find it funny people use them with thier portable ear killers.
fart said:they're for any monitoring situation. musicians use them as personal monitors during live performances as well. they make perfect sense for recreational use because noise pollution from outside a playback device degrades the quality of the sound heard by the recreational listener, not to mention listeners tend to not turn up the intensity of a playback device if the earphones provide isolation, which reduces the overall intensity the ear sees, which is kinder on the inner ear.
ps, fuck off.
fart said:who wouldn't be a little bugged at such obvious trolling.
even i noticed it and my first post was about (my) dick in feder's ear canal (OH SO HOT)
the fact remains that people do use them as monitors (studio and live), and they make some pretty good sense for those who do. yes some people opt for plugs live but this is a stupid argument.
the point is they DO make sense for home use, they're extremely UNLIKELY to permanently damage someone's hearing, and no one really wants to hear about it if you think they do.
i'm genuinely curious why this is so. (go go thread hijack)Fixed2BeBroken said:yea they are used in studios, but mostly for recording (so there is no sound leakage so you get the cleanest mic signal)...but engees dont really rely on them for themselves for multiple reasons that i could go into detail about...but dont really feel like it.
fart said:i'm genuinely curious why this is so. (go go thread hijack)
fart said:i mean, you should get cleaner sound from in-ear monitors than closed circumaural ones right?