This beautiful song was made by a 5 second prompt
- Thread starter Danny22
- Start date
IlGialloMondadori
Member
What a load of garbage.
Dr.Morris79
Gold Member
It ain't for me 
I'll just stick to the olds if need be
I'll just stick to the olds if need be
kpopSuperstar
Member
I have no concern regarding AI and music. It doesnt have the demanding production cycle of movies and games.
There will be some decent AI songs here and there, but humans can compete with it. Music is also heavily about the marketing more than just making good music. The top 100 popular songs out right now is more about famous artists and what label they are signed to than the quality of their songs.
The only way this would be a big issue is if the major companies would ignore humans and produce everything through AI systems. Which won't happen because it's the brand of people like Taylor Swift or Dua Lipa as people that really sells.
You will have some AI songs on YouTube and TikTok that will trend for time to time, and likely you might get some high charted AI songs, but I see no future where people will be outcompeted and outdated in music.
There will be some decent AI songs here and there, but humans can compete with it. Music is also heavily about the marketing more than just making good music. The top 100 popular songs out right now is more about famous artists and what label they are signed to than the quality of their songs.
The only way this would be a big issue is if the major companies would ignore humans and produce everything through AI systems. Which won't happen because it's the brand of people like Taylor Swift or Dua Lipa as people that really sells.
You will have some AI songs on YouTube and TikTok that will trend for time to time, and likely you might get some high charted AI songs, but I see no future where people will be outcompeted and outdated in music.
kruis
Exposing the sinister cartel of retailers who allow companies to pay for advertising space.
You're too naive.
When it costs peanuts to create these AI tracks, shady companies will absolutely try to monetize those tracks on Spotify, Apple Music, Tidal, etc. If one of those tracks unexpectedly become popular among clueless listeners, it's almost free money. Spotify will be flooded by AI songs, recommending them left and right to its subscribers in its automated playlists and lots of listeners will find it increasingly difficult to discover new music without inadvertently adding AI songs and non existing bands and artists to their music libraries.
Spotify needs to implement AI filters right now before this blows up.
Last edited:
ProtoByte
Weeb Underling
The bot activity in the comment section is insane. Pretty sure bots have started or will start using the phrase themselves, but holy dead internet.
It's going to start forcing platforms to do a better job at curation. Record labels are going to have to protect themselves which ultimately means protecting their real life talent.
Last edited:
Trunx81
Member
calistan
Member
From the BBC a few days ago - plagiarists are using AI to create music in the style of known (but not huge) artists, uploading it to streaming services, and taking the profits from unsuspecting listeners.
There's zero curation, since nearly 100,000 songs are uploaded every day. Anyone could do it, zero talent required.
www.bbc.co.uk
There's zero curation, since nearly 100,000 songs are uploaded every day. Anyone could do it, zero talent required.
'AI slop': Emily Portman and musicians on the mystery of fraudsters releasing songs in their name
Artists on the mystery of being targeted by fraudsters releasing "AI slop" songs in their name.
www.bbc.co.uk
Danny22
Member
100k in a day is wild.From the BBC a few days ago - plagiarists are using AI to create music in the style of known (but not huge) artists, uploading it to streaming services, and taking the profits from unsuspecting listeners.
There's zero curation, since nearly 100,000 songs are uploaded every day. Anyone could do it, zero talent required.
'AI slop': Emily Portman and musicians on the mystery of fraudsters releasing songs in their name
Artists on the mystery of being targeted by fraudsters releasing "AI slop" songs in their name.
True but can you imagine the view count if a famous person had sung this? Although I suppose you could say that about small-time artists.
Same for books btw. Same for 'the most beautiful' images at this point. Or paintings. Way too much content so either you're '1 out of million' lucky and go viral or you need an established brand.
Kind of want to see this in big budget movie making or AAA games.
Wildebeest
Member
I guess if it all it takes for you are a few synth pads and an autotuned singer.
Maybe this is sort of artist this is a copy of a copy of.
Maybe this is sort of artist this is a copy of a copy of.
kpopSuperstar
Member
But that's not how people listen to music. I don't know anyone who randomly listen to random music, people listen to stuff because it belongs to artists they like and follow.
You can have hundreds of thousands of decent AI music uploaded to YouTube and people still won't care.
The point where this will become an issue is when companies starts to make digital artists.
But music is not that hard to make, skilled musicians can still make music relatively quick and easy.
The short term issue is all the spamming and copycat shit, the long term issue is digital artists made by big companies. But even so, it's not like the movie industry, where it's so expensive and demanding that AI productions will outdate humans. Music will always be doable for everyday people.
NeoIkaruGAF
Gold Member
In a world where Hatsune Miku and Squid Sisters concerts have been a thing for a few years already, we won't even need AI singers to be perfect onstage to compete for the spotlight against real singers and bands.
They'll never ask for compensation and royalties. They'll never skip a tour date, even if they are pregnant, sick or drunk. Every kind of story will be created about them by their labels, yet they'll always appear onstage in their best shape and song in an eternally perfect voice. And the less successful one will be replaced with little effort.
I think we may even see real-people bands performing onstage before completely AI main events.
Compared to games and especially movies, AI will have very little trouble replacing real people in music to an alarming degree.
kruis
Exposing the sinister cartel of retailers who allow companies to pay for advertising space.
Guess you've never heard of Spotify's "Smart Shuffle" feature.
Spotify also has very prominent AI generated "Made For You" and "Your top mixes" playlists section based on your personal playlists and listening habits. It's also possible to subscribe to other people's playlists. Anyone using these features could inadvertently come across AI generated music.
Trunx81
Member
He actually complained a few years ago about the lack of "depth" in current music.Even this man would be embarrassed by that junk.
T8SC
Member
He's right, it's pretty bad these days, nobody even acknowledges the listener at the start of a song anymore!
poppabk
Cheeks Spread for Digital Only Future
I would recommend 'Idoru' by William Gibson. We will definitely have a virtual super star within the next decade or two.
DKehoe
Member
He's right, it's pretty bad these days, nobody even acknowledges the listener at the start of a song anymore!
Poppinfresh
Member
Why should they?
There's a market for AI-generated entertainment and the song posted above doesn't sound any better or worse than countless mediocre "real" artists on Spotify. I mean, if stuck that song in the middle of a bunch of songs currently being played on the radio, I'd be hard-pressed to tell you which one was AI and which one wasn't.
The entertainment industry and other creatives are going to resist AI just like they resisted MP3s, streaming, and digital distribution, but AI is the future and within 5-10 years it's going to be commonplace and normal to have completely AI-generated entertainment.
Reizo Ryuu
Member
The thing I listen to the most and the entire reason I chose that service to subscribe to is Apple Music Radio, so I constantly hear new stuff and can directly add it to my library if I like something.
Mitsurux
Member
Record labels will totally begin to include AI artists into their portfolios. There is just to many pluses for them.
Vast reduction in music production costs.
Elimination of any Human related issues (Sickness, writers block, personal issues, contract negotiations etc.)
Possible adjustment on what responsibilities a Producer or A&R person has. (New Roles?)
Easy ability to remix or alter music from existing music catalogs that the label owns.
The tech will only get better
Then you have the more interesting aspects like virtual artist concerts, resurrection of deceased artist etc.
Vast reduction in music production costs.
Elimination of any Human related issues (Sickness, writers block, personal issues, contract negotiations etc.)
Possible adjustment on what responsibilities a Producer or A&R person has. (New Roles?)
Easy ability to remix or alter music from existing music catalogs that the label owns.
The tech will only get better
Then you have the more interesting aspects like virtual artist concerts, resurrection of deceased artist etc.
Danny22
Member
Whats the name, its not showing up for me?
What are they supposed to do with a 100k songs per day? Use AI to find AI?
Yeah I think people are going with a pre conceived opinion. I shouldn't have written this was a prompt song. Maybe let the users discover it themselves.
I'm not sure how someone can listen from 1;16 to 1:57 and say that? I'm assuming you're anti-AI and call it slop when used in entertainment? Genuinely curious.
Who is he?Even this man would be embarrassed by that junk.
Last edited:
Trunx81
Member
Verknallt in einen Talahon
And the guy is HP Baxxter from Scooter (HP stands for Hans-Peter)
poodaddy
Member
You asked for two minutes bud. The song sucks. Thus, you owing me two min-, eh, fuck it. Know what, whatever point you think you made, you're completely right bud.
Danny22
Member
I'm not sure how someone can listen from 1;16 to 1:57 and say that? I'm assuming you're anti-AI and call it all slop when used in entertainment? Genuinely curious.
You asked for two minutes bud. The song sucks. Thus, you owing me two min-, eh, fuck it. Know what, whatever point you think you made, you're completely right bud.
Last edited:
The Cockatrice
I'm retarded?
People who claim they "know" it was AI are just full of shit lmao. That being said, artists should be protected, though I'm not sure what can be done.
Last edited:
Reizo Ryuu
Member
did you forget you posted that already, or are you actually a bot yourself?
diffusionx
Gold Member
OP in shambles
T8SC
Member
Dave. You can usually find him on a train.
Grildon Tundy
Gold Member
The voice and melody is nice. The instrumentation is boring.
Sounds like the BGM on an emotionally-manipulative TikTok about a Millenial couple saving a stray baby raccoon.
Sounds like the BGM on an emotionally-manipulative TikTok about a Millenial couple saving a stray baby raccoon.
RJMacready73
Simps for Amouranth
Heimdall_Xtreme
Hermen Hulst Fanclub's #1 Member
Britney Spears, Metallica, Foo Fighters, Korn, Limp Bizkit... And many more must be furious and distressed by AI.
Just like musicians who want to start a band.
Just like musicians who want to start a band.
Last edited:
Danny22
Member
I actually edited it after he replied to it, then decided to post it again because I really wanted an answer to it (as to whether he calls all AI slop). I feel like if you're calling this slop, you're likely calling all AI usage slop.did you forget you posted that already, or are you actually a bot yourself?
I know I regret so badly adding 5 second prompt in that line. I think most of these calling it 'wtf is this shite' wouldn't have had such reactions if I had and it would have been more interesting if some 'ai slop' NPCs had liked it and then discovered it was AI. Any way to edit that headline?
Last edited:
The Cockatrice
I'm retarded?
You can report your own post and ask a mod to edit it if they accept ofc. Too late though.
Last edited:
diffusionx
Gold Member
if you want to play music, just play music. AI doesn't change any of that. People who think they can make a career out of pop music probably need to change their plans sure but that's also been the case for at least a decade. It's very difficult to make a living as a pop musician these days.
Poppinfresh
Member
There's plenty of boring and worthless slop being turned out by humans, so human involvement or lack thereof doesn't dictate how worthless (or not) something is.
You play this to people randomly without telling them it's AI and 9/10 wouldn't be able to tell, and I'd wonder if the person who was able to tell was actually able to tell or just got lucky with a guess.
As for protecting artists, beyond ensuring that their likeness isn't used without their consent, I don't think they need protection. AI-created music (and everything else) is free-market competition, and competition is good.
RCX
Member
Agreed on the first point. But does that mean we should uber-mechanize the production of that slop with AI?
Clear
CliffyB's Cock Holster
Its AI slop because if you actually pay attention its evidently just a superficially convincing facsimile of a real song.
The lyrics seem to make sense, but like a perfectly rendered human hand with too many fingers, they actually don't.
No meaning. No emotion. No talent required.
The lyrics seem to make sense, but like a perfectly rendered human hand with too many fingers, they actually don't.
No meaning. No emotion. No talent required.