Syphon Filter
Member
He means the AI.
I believe the A.I is only as a supplement to the matches. They cant actually replace players.
He means the AI.
Not bots in the traditional sense. Like Unreal tournament,etc It's A.I for the matches but not actual bots to replace players.
People for Call of Duty: "SHIT GRAPHICS OMG"
People for Titanfall: "HYPE OMG BEST GAEM EVER"
I really don't get it.
Yeah, it really looks like a world that could have been awesome for SP.I didn't care about a SP campaign until watching that.
I really don't get it.
We've played it.
People for Call of Duty: "SHIT GRAPHICS OMG"
People for Titanfall: "HYPE OMG BEST GAEM EVER"
I really don't get it.
How the hell did you get footage of my beta gameplay
How the hell did you get footage of my beta gameplay
So Whatsup with that titan with jet packs eh? Must be a scripted event cause I know that wasn't in the beta..
More interested in blocking punches myself.
Not to put a downer on Titanfall but it doesn't necessarily have the greatest graphics ever. No one has said that. It is one of the most fun multiplayer games ever however.. hence the perhaps not quite so extreme as your example comments from fans.
Have you even seen Titanfall?
HQ version, 30 fps sadly but still looking great
http://www.gamersyde.com/news_titanfall_launch_trailer-15086_en.html
(give our new stream a try, I'm quite happy with the quality)
So much quotes here oh.
I mean lots of people complaining about Call of Duty's graphics and thinking Activision is milking gamers. I think there is no much difference here.
Multiplayer only game, with bad graphics, for 59.99 dollars. Additional DLC incoming in 45 days after launch with 14.99 dollars(I guess?).
I played beta on my PC too and loved gameplay. But pricing is not fair.
Why is the pricing not fair? I spent 60 hours with the free beta and enjoyed that time far more than with any other game I've played recently.
So much quotes here oh.
I mean lots of people complaining about Call of Duty's graphics and thinking Activision is milking gamers. I think there is no much difference here.
Multiplayer only game, with bad graphics, for 59.99 dollars. Additional DLC incoming in 45 days after launch with 14.99 dollars(I guess?).
I played beta on my PC too and loved gameplay. But pricing is not fair.
So much quotes here oh.
I mean lots of people complaining about Call of Duty's graphics and thinking Activision is milking gamers. I think there is no much difference here.
Multiplayer only game, with bad graphics, for 59.99 dollars. Additional DLC incoming in 45 days after launch with 14.99 dollars(I guess?).
I played beta on my PC too and loved gameplay. But pricing is not fair.
So much quotes here oh.
I mean lots of people complaining about Call of Duty's graphics and thinking Activision is milking gamers. I think there is no much difference here.
Multiplayer only game, with bad graphics, for 59.99 dollars. Additional DLC incoming in 45 days after launch with 14.99 dollars(I guess?).
I played beta on my PC too and loved gameplay. But pricing is not fair.
It looks more like a single player story, than a multiplayer game :/
Going to be so many uninformed kids returning this.
Awesome trailer. But it's also a huge bummer that this game has no single player campaign.
Why tease with narrative stuff?
Good multiplayer can provide potentially days of playtime but not having a crappy 5 hour campaign makes a game worth less than $60?So much quotes here oh.
I mean lots of people complaining about Call of Duty's graphics and thinking Activision is milking gamers. I think there is no much difference here.
Multiplayer only game, with bad graphics, for 59.99 dollars. Additional DLC incoming in 45 days after launch with 14.99 dollars(I guess?).
I played beta on my PC too and loved gameplay. But pricing is not fair.
So much quotes here oh.
I mean lots of people complaining about Call of Duty's graphics and thinking Activision is milking gamers. I think there is no much difference here.
Multiplayer only game, with bad graphics, for 59.99 dollars. Additional DLC incoming in 45 days after launch with 14.99 dollars(I guess?).
I played beta on my PC too and loved gameplay. But pricing is not fair.
I saw a glitch already at the 1:30 mark. Looks pretty good so far. Hitting the PC version for me.
Weeeeeeeeeird.
![]()
I still don't get what connection you've made between the graphics and 'best game ever' posts. They're not saying 'best graphics ever', and the gameplay is notably different compared to CoD.So much quotes here oh.
I mean lots of people complaining about Call of Duty's graphics and thinking Activision is milking gamers. I think there is no much difference here.
Multiplayer only game, with bad graphics, for 59.99 dollars. Additional DLC incoming in 45 days after launch with 14.99 dollars(I guess?).
I played beta on my PC too and loved gameplay. But pricing is not fair.
HQ version, 30 fps sadly but still looking great
http://www.gamersyde.com/news_titanfall_launch_trailer-15086_en.html
(give our new stream a try, I'm quite happy with the quality)