So when it's -30 Celsius like it gets in winter in most of Canada, the car won't start? This is DOA then.
Toyota Long Range EVs -Reuters
Gonna be interesting if they double Tesla's range and get like 600 miles on a charge, while halving charge time to like 10-15 minutes.
You can make them with sodium which can be had from seawater. Unless I misread one of the articles linked in here.Wow that sounds like it is a huge leap forward.
I wonder about cost, safety, how long it will take to go into production and lastly if it is any better for the environment as compared to Lithium. Hopefully these solid state materials don't need rare earth minerals.
Even if it didn't provide any added benefit that would be amazing if they were made with a commonly found substance.You can make them with sodium which can be had from seawater. Unless I misread one of the articles linked in here.
Tesla has 5 more years of development before then. Not saying that wouldn't be revolutionary but Tesla has the advantage that it already is in mass production with its cars.
In this article (https://news.utexas.edu/2017/02/28/goodenough-introduces-new-battery-technology) it says that particular technology works better in cold climates. So if they're using the same thing then you'll better off in -30C weather.Ugh, but it gets to -30C in my city
On a more serious note though, this type of tech would be amazing for grid-level storage and other industrial applications that need high power densities.
In this article (https://news.utexas.edu/2017/02/28/goodenough-introduces-new-battery-technology) it says that particular technology works better in cold climates. So if they're using the same thing then you'll better off in -30C weather.
You're setting hard limits to that already but this is first generation stuff we're talking about. It also says it can operate at -20C, not that it shuts down after that.That same article says that it only works to -20C
Anyhow, the reason why there's a temperature range for solid state batteries is because of carrier mobility. That's why most of them run hot instead of -20C to 60C.
What hurts Tesla isn't their competitors' R&D budgets so much as terrible local and state laws in America that require new cars be sold at dealerships and hinder if not outright forbids new car sales over the internet. This gives the big auto companies a distinct advantage in time to react to popular upstarts like Tesla and copy/reverse engineer their technology to be disseminated through their dealership systems.
It may not be good long term for Tesla, but if the big autos are reacting by making their own long distance electrics, then that's better for us as consumers and the planet as a whole.
I just hope these batteries contain minimal toxic materials, because that's currently the oddball faux-environmentalist criticism of electric cars.
Toyota Long Range EVs -Reuters
Gonna be interesting if they double Tesla's range and get like 600 miles on a charge, while halving charge time to like 10-15 minutes.
I believe they have an energy density that is 3 times greater than lithium ion battery of the same size (3 times the range on a single charge). They last for far more charging cycles since dendrites cannot form at the electrodes (i.e., at the anode and cathode). And they charge many times faster than even quick charging lithium ion batteries (a few minutes...like filling up at the pump).
They are the answer to our battery needs.
Toyota started their own accelerated R&D in batteries in 2010:
https://www.toyota-europe.com/world...echnology/next-generation-secondary-batteries
More reports come every few years:
https://www.toyota-europe.com/world...echnology/next-generation-secondary-batteries
They are working with 4 major universities in Japan plus NIMS which is one of the largest research centers in Japan.
In 2011 they published paper in UK mag on new solid state battery. In 2012 they had small working samples.
You can find examples that they started as early as 2008:
http://www.ilika.com/about-ilika/materials-innovation/solid-state-batteries
Generally Toyota does not publish PR pieces and false news... but they did not post anything about 2022 date. It might be telling that Toyoda is now personally spearheading the EV projects.
What does this mean for the gigafactory?
Theoretically, this technology greatly reduces the chances of fire/explosion. Being a solid, it is vastly more stable than the liquid we are using now, and is virtually leak-proof as an added benefit.Wonder how long till a car company has a Samsung situation with exploding batteries and cars catching fire.
Isn't it a bit ignorant to assume Tesla isn't working on solid state themselves?
Either way I like where the industry is heading and the more competition the better.
If only they could do away with car dealerships. Let me buy directly.
Probably another 5 years until I own an electric vehicle. Not enough options yet and the model 3 feels a bit above me even in it's "affordable" price range.
i wonder how fast the car will start
If Toyota can backup their claim, I'm in.
2022 is code for "we don't know if it's possible, but we are confident enough in the risk/reward ratio that we can put 5 years of R&D towards it".
This article tells me 3 things:
1. The risk/reward to push away from Lithium is extremely high right now (probably a lot of market pressure on buying/making the batteries)
2. Toyota possesses R&D that says a solution is inevitable
3. They are not certain at all if that solution is 3, 5, or 10 years away.
I wouldn't hold my breath - lots of materials that remain "5 years away" all the time, but it's clearly good news that Toyota is making a substantial R&D push. As usual the race is not "does it work?" but "can we make it cheaply enough to put in a car?"
They still do research themselves. Here's an example.Tesla does not do R&D on battery, likes of Panasonic and LG Chem do that... I am sure they are doing it to.
Since EVs dont matter for where i live, i wonder what will be application in other industries - significantly more dense small batteries will do wonders for electronics.
Almost a year into his new research partnership with Tesla, battery researcher Jeff Dahn has been hitting the talk circuit presenting some of his teams recent progress. We reported last week on his talk at the International Battery Seminar from March and now we have a talk from him at MIT this week.
He went into details about why Tesla decided to work with his team and hire one of his graduate students, but he also announced that they have developed cells that can double the lifetime of the batteries in Teslas products 4 years ahead of schedule.
Update: Dahn reached out to clarify that the cells in question were tested in the lab and they are not in Teslas products yet.
During the talk titled Why would Tesla Motors partner with some Canadian? embedded below, Dahn explained how they invented a way to test battery cells in order to accurately monitor them during charging and discharging to identify causes for degradation.
One of his students working on the project went on to work for Teslas in-house battery cell research group and another started a company to commercialize the battery cell testing machines that they developed. Their client list includes Tesla, but also Apple, GM, 24M, and plenty of other large battery manufacturers and consumers.
https://electrek.co/2017/05/09/tesla-battery-lifetime-double/While we couldnt get that valuable information, when they started recording again, it was for a Q&A session and the first question was about his teams ultimate goal for the lifetime of li-ion batteries.
He hesitated to answer, but then he said:
In the description of the [Tesla] project that we sent to NSERC (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada) to get matching funds from the government for the project, I wrote down the goal of doubling the lifetime of the cells used in the Tesla products at the same upper cutoff voltage. We exceeded that in round one. OK? So that was the goal of the project and it has already been exceeded. We are not going to stop obviously we have another four years to go. We are going to go as far as we can.
I dunno, 2022 is pretty aggressive in auto industry terms.
If Toyota can backup their claim, I'm in.
It's probably more like five to ten years. If you don't believe me search around for the major automakers plans to go electric. They're really not that aggressive compared to Tesla, and Tesla won't have a ton of stranded assets.
(Reuters) - Tesla Motors Inc (TSLA.O) said it was stepping up production plans for its upcoming Model 3 mass-market sedan and would build a total of 500,000 all-electric vehicles in 2018, two years ahead of schedule, but warned that spending will ramp up in tandem.
"This announcement marks the end of the solely combustion engine-powered car," said Hakan Samuelsson, Volvo president and chief executive, in a statement. "Volvo Cars has stated that it plans to have sold a total of 1 million electrified cars by 2025. When we said it we meant it. This is how we are going to do it."
Any improvements in battery tech are very welcome, but there are a number of elephants in the room that are going to stop large scale adoption of EV.
Infrastructure is one, both in terms of charging stations, and also for people how have restricted access to powerpoints at their homes, pricing is another, and the other thing is a change in mindset, this is be a big ask, people have been so used to petrol driven cars for so long that they view any shift with a sideways glance.
Not really. As long as a car looks good and is comfortable people will buy it. Hardcore motorheads are a small minority. In my country EVs are frequently top sellers of a given month. Infrastructure follows that success. It gets easier and easier to charge one on your way around town or at home. Government subsidy for environmentally friendly vehicles helps though.
It wont last long, people always have very strong opinions until they're made to look a bit silly. They're just people fighting against the future, being pretentious about something they barely have a grasp of.Maybe it's a social thing dependent on country?, which country are you in?, I've seen a lot of responses from the US and the UK that are quite damning, not to mention the whole slew of myths that are banded around.
If they don't give this man his noble prize before he dies I'll be pissedA 94 year old man may wind up playing a huge part in bringing us a glorius sustainable world.
The ageism (and all other "-isms") that exists in the tech world needs to die.
So when it's -30 Celsius like it gets in winter in most of Canada, the car won't start? This is DOA then.
The mindset change will come if you address the other points. People will gravitate to whatever is convenient, and cheap. Most will not even think about it once you hit those two points.Any improvements in battery tech are very welcome, but there are a number of elephants in the room that are going to stop large scale adoption of EV.
Infrastructure is one, both in terms of charging stations, and also for people how have restricted access to powerpoints at their homes, pricing is another, and the other thing is a change in mindset, this is be a big ask, people have been so used to petrol driven cars for so long that they view any shift with a sideways glance.