Can Crusher
Banned
Don't worry, MS will just add more servers. More servers = more cloud transistors = more hardware power = Better yields = cheaper hardware OMG this is good news!
probably the whole PS Meeting part
No. That didn't matter, it was the fact that Sony were ready to reveal early and go hard for 2013.
probably the whole PS Meeting part
Well there ya go. The 8GB DDR5 may be the "caught off guard" part?
probably the whole PS Meeting part
I am not so sure about this. At least, PS4 and XBone seem to be on par with regards to CPU power and size of memory (although PS4 has more memory dedicated to games, but XBone still has plenty). XBone might get inferior drawing distances but world size and AI should suffer that much.
The only one that can save them, the one who should have been helming the entire division, the one that got them to where they wanted to be
Despite being an MS hater, this is not good at all. Who's stopping devs from making multiplats optimized for the XBone and porting them to the PS4 without any optimization? If they don't make use of that extra power, what's the point?
If the Xbox One is much cheaper than the PS4 perhaps this will happen.
Correction: Gameplay>graphics, except when those graphics are a skybox based on complex atmospheric equations solved in the cloud.
CoD is huge, but it's not the "next big thing". This happens every generation. Previous huge franchises stay huge( for a time ), but they aren't the driver of hardware sales they once were. Whichever platform grabs the "next big thing" in gaming will be the one who succeeds first.
If the Xbox One is much cheaper than the PS4 perhaps this will happen.
If the Xbox One is much cheaper than the PS4 perhaps this will happen.
No, they have separate cocks that can be modified at wish. Heck, they have separate power saving frequencies [CPU will not always work @ full speed, GPU also].
In terms of the mass market MS could still be in a better position then sony
they have kinect built in, the X1 could be the wii of this gen but it would be like if the wii had 512mb of slower then 360 ram, a GPU with half the flops but the same architecture.
and a 800-900flop DX11 GPU with 5GB+32mb esram is not going to produce games that makes gamers rip out there eyes and smash the screen in disgust
that hardware will still be able to produce games that look a lot better then we have now.
I'm at a loss of how they thought that 2013 would not be the time to launch? I'm curious to think how long they thought they could ride the 360 out? Till 2015? That makes no sense.
have you noticed how geoff keighley and cboat are never in the same place at the same time?
May be a stupid question, but if a constrained launch supply is the biggest problem that these poor yields will lead to, assuming that they don't downclock, is this really that terrible a thing for them? Couldn't they just as quickly spin a thin supply as artificially high demand as they sort it out, it's not exactly a new practice.
From what I understand, if they change the GPU clock in an APU set up that affects the CPU too. TheCPU would be downclocked too. They have to be multiples of each other.(or the GPU is set up to be a 2x multiplier)GPU is fine for the title. I mean technically its an APU which includes the CPU/GPU and eSRAM, and is the part they're having yield problems with so that's what they'll be downclocking.
However while technically that's true they could possibly change some APU settings so that only the GPU ends up slower. So considering at the moment we've only heard of a GPU downclock I'd say "GPU" is best to use in the title as its going to be clearer and easier to understand for most of GAF
Serious question: why is the confirmation post written like the person was drunk and riding a train? Were they drunk and riding a train?
Serious question: why is the confirmation post written like the person was drunk and riding a train? Were they drunk and riding a train?
Serious question: why is the confirmation post written like the person was drunk and riding a train? Were they drunk and riding a train?
Hmm....so MS was really targeting 2014 then?
Yeah thats what gets me too. What the heck has Microsoft been doing these last couple of years? But if CBOAT is right then it really was a failure in leadership which means Mattrick and Ballmer.I'm at a loss of how they thought that 2013 would not be the time to launch? I'm curious to think how long they thought they could ride the 360 out? Till 2015? That makes no sense.
You'll have to show me where as I never saw it.
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2013/05/xbox-one/
" A single 28-nanometer chip contains an integrated CPU, GPU, and embedded memory rather than three separate units crammed onto a 90-nm chip in the 360."
(Updated: The latest information seems to be that Microsoft got it wrong, and that it is in fact a 28nm SoC, just like Kabini.)-link
Serious question: why is the confirmation post written like the person was drunk and riding a train? Were they drunk and riding a train?
Well there ya go. The 8GB DDR5 may be the "caught off guard" part?
have you noticed how geoff keighley and cboat are never in the same place at the same time?
The only one that can save them, the one who should have been helming the entire division, the one that got them to where they wanted to be
From what I understand, if they change the GPU clock in an APU set that affects the CPU too. There the CPU would be down locked too. They have to be multiples of each other.
If the Xbox One is much cheaper than the PS4 perhaps this will happen.
Makes it harder to be found by searching, and other websites and blogs aren't likely to quote it.
Serious question: why is the confirmation post written like the person was drunk and riding a train? Were they drunk and riding a train?
People just talking about FLOPs a la CUs, a downclock means triangle set-up rate will be lower, it's fillrate will be lower. Just what a piece of shit.
Hmm....so MS was really targeting 2014 then?
Wow, that is no good.
There's some truth to this, but there's a flip side to it as well. If Sony doesn't have similar supply issues with PS4, and they're just flying off the shelves through holiday 2013 at a 2 or 3 to 1 ratio versus the Xbone, that's going to be trouble. Ask any platform holder what they'd rather have: sales or spin.
From what I understand, if they change the GPU clock in an APU set that affects the CPU too. There the CPU would be down locked too. They have to be multiples of each other.
800/1600mhz for example. If the the GPU is dc to 700, than the CPU would decrease to 1400mhz. So XBone would have a CPU disadvantage as well.
Can anyone confirm this?
If the Xbox One is much cheaper than the PS4 perhaps this will happen.
also, Sony was damn lucky (or they made a really smart choice) getting a certifiable genius being the architect of their system.
what i understand and i believe almost all us do too, is that MS trying to ride the same boat as ninty in 2006. civilians like to flail their limbs in front of the tv more than we can think of.
My bet would be that they thought Sony would not go first as Sony could not afford to go first. Somehow Sony is still trying to, but whatever.
Something tells me we'll see a lot of CG smoke and mirrors.Man, poor MS can't catch a break lol
Seriously E3 can't come soon enough. We'll really see what the console can do compared to the PS4.
If things are as bad as some are making it seem though, no amount of money is acceptable by any smart business to associate itself with a seeming sinking ship. For this reason, I doubt a lot of this is as bad as it seems at the moment.With all this info coming out, I think it leads more evidence to MS throwing a lot of money to lock up stuff like LoL and other games rumored about recently.
Makes sense, it caught everybody off guard
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=514454&page=73
even developers.
Also Sony is lunching WORLDWIDE. We don't know if MS will do that too or they will do one region after another.
Someone need to comment this.