Turkish Women allowed to wear head scarfs in Universities

Status
Not open for further replies.

Zapages

Member
Now this is more like it.

Turkish students allowed to wear headscarves


ANKARA, Feb 7: The Turkish parliament on Thursday adopted a constitutional amendment allowing women to wear headscarves in universities, a move that is strongly opposed by secularists.

Assembly deputy speaker Nevzat Pakdil announced that two votes by secret ballot easily achieved the two-thirds majority necessary to modify the constitution.

The ban on headscarves in universities has been implemented in varying degrees over the years, forcing many women to abandon their education and others to hide their headscarves under wigs to attend classes.

The key amendment said that “no one can be deprived of their right to higher education”, an allusion to young women who wear headscarves.—AFP

Source: http://dawn.com/2008/02/08/top11.htm
 
Nice to see :)

Once they choose to wear it, they must leave it on in public. This way, they won't be discouraged to go to Uni.
 
why is it even banned in the first place? Wasn't there or isn't there a large population of Muslims in that country at some point since they were conquered by Muslim rulers for a period of time. Plus they have some real nice mosques too.
 
black_13 said:
why is it even banned in the first place? Wasn't there or isn't there a large population of Muslims in that country at some point since they were conquered by Muslim rulers for a period of time. Plus they have some real nice mosques too.


Turkey is a Muslim country with an identity crisis due to Mustufa Kermal reaction to the Arab revolt and his actions to end anything Islamic in forming the "republic" after World War I... But now a days, its the military and their actions to end anything "Islamic" as it is afraid to be modern moderate Islamic country, which the people of the nation want. While the secularist want a country that pure secularist even more so than Europe itself and no once of religion from their daily practices in private and public life.
 
Good for them, I've been following this a while, what I find stupid is the secularists argument that by wearing headscarfs the country is one step closer to turning like iran.

Which in my poinion is complete bullshit....

First of all if they are so passionate about promoting democracy and that, then shouldn't they be happy and say it is now the womans choice to wear or not wear one, instead of forcing to make some woman do what they might not want to (not wear one)...

Anyway good for them
 
black_13 said:
why is it even banned in the first place? Wasn't there or isn't there a large population of Muslims in that country at some point since they were conquered by Muslim rulers for a period of time. Plus they have some real nice mosques too.

Dude it's an islamic country. 99.8% of Turks are muslim. But it's a country with a long history of secularism and the government has had a tendency to go a bit overboard with that.

But Ataturk's (the dude primarily responsible for Turkey's secularism) party lost for like, one of the first times ever(?) recently, and the new gov is much more islamic.
 
A headscarf is not required by Islam.


Pretty much the first step in having the fundamentalists gain more power especially over societal norms. Now those women who do not want to wear a scarf will be forced too given the peer pressure. A worrying sign.
 
Ripclawe said:
A headscarf is not required by Islam.


Pretty much the first step in having the fundamentalists gain more power especially over societal norms. Now those women who do not want to wear a scarf will be forced too given the peer pressure. A worrying sign.

boo hoo... If a western country's party is conservative than its alright with the world. Oh God forbid an Islamic country's elected party is Islamic. El is Extremist... The west is such a hypocritical society.

Not a worrying sign at all. Its good sign that country will come back to its Islamic roots, yet becoming a true democracy where freedom of choice is given to everyone.

Actually 'Headscraf' is a debatable subject... It can be on some interruptions or it could mean covering up.

The secularist are afraid that some religious women will be allowed to wear the headscraf and the women who chose not to wear it will feel that they are not pious then them or feel belittled as they won't be equal in appearance.

Which I say BS... Its the women's choice to do so. Let them chose what they want to do, instead of forcing them to do the one or another.
 
Ripclawe said:
A headscarf is not required by Islam.


Pretty much the first step in having the fundamentalists gain more power especially over societal norms. Now those women who do not want to wear a scarf will be forced too given the peer pressure. A worrying sign.

This is the unfortunate truth.
 
Ripclawe said:
A headscarf is not required by Islam.


Pretty much the first step in having the fundamentalists gain more power especially over societal norms. Now those women who do not want to wear a scarf will be forced too given the peer pressure. A worrying sign.
What about those women that were forced to not wear one? They wanted to, but they couldn't.

This amendment doesn't force women to wear hijab, it just gives them the option to. It's no different than what you have here in USA.

I don't see how that's worrying.
 
Zapages said:
boo hoo... If a western country's party is conservative than its alright with the world. Oh God forbid an Islamic country's elected party is Islamic. El is Extremist... The west is such a hypocritical society.

Not a worrying sign at all. Its good sign that country will come back to its Islamic roots, yet becoming a true democracy where freedom of choice is given to everyone.

Actually 'Headscraf' is a debatable subject... It can be on some interruptions or it could mean covering up.

The secularist are afraid that some religious women will be allowed to wear the headscraf and the women who chose not to wear it will feel that they are not pious then them or feel belittled as they won't be equal in appearance.

Which I say BS... Its the women's choice to do so. Let them chose what they want to do, instead of forcing them to do the one or another.

Turkey is not an Islamic country, Turkey is a secular republic. In the same way that the U.S is not a Christian nation even though Christians are the majority.
 
Septy said:
Turkey is not an Islamic country, Turkey is a secular republic. In the same way that the U.S is not a Christian nation even though Christians are the majority.

Yet the basis of some parts of the constitution are based upon the Bible...

Yet Turkey is trying to shun her own past, by ridiculing that its no longer an Islamic Country. Nevertheless she will be as long as there are practicing Muslims in the majority of the nation.

The Turkish Military will be forever be known for surprising democracy in its pure form, which includes religious and practical freedom.

Islam's political wing is very social democratic. But it is man who is corrupted Islam in the sense of its interpretation when everything is written well before the democracy that we know today was formed.
 
Zapages said:
Yet the basis of some parts of the constitution are based upon the Bible...

Yet Turkey is trying to shun her own past, by ridiculing that its no longer an Islamic Country. Nevertheless she will be as long as there are practicing Muslims in the majority of the nation.

The Turkish Military will be forever be known for surprising democracy in its pure form, which includes religious and practical freedom.

Islam's political wing is very social democratic. But it is man who is corrupted Islam in the sense of its interpretation when everything is written well before the democracy that we know today was formed.

Which passages of the Bible specifically? There is mention of God, but the U.S shunned a notion of a state religion from the beginning.

I'm curious, if Turkey were to become an Islamic state, do you think people should have the freedom to convert to another religion or leave religion altogther?

EDIT: I don't see how the "West" is hypocritical from a few posts here in this thread. European countries seem to prefer dealing with the present government instead of dealing with the Nationalist party.
 
The U.S Constitution is entirely secular. One of the great achievements by the founding fathers.

I hope Turkey stays secular. It's amazing that it has stayed secular even until this day. But I am worried as it seems less people in the country want secularism.
 
Quellex said:
Now Turkey will become a Shariah state, they are pretty much doomed!

Sad.

Yup sadly....
But i think the army will be a serious watchdog.
Religion and state must be separated..at all costs.
 
thesoapster said:
:lol

Nice to see some an extra ounce of freedom for those who choose to follow that.

In a perfect world yes..But when an islamic party takes the power ---> NO
Stop being naives people...This is the first step to put more religion into the state.
 
Masenkame said:
The U.S Constitution is entirely secular. One of the great achievements by the founding fathers.

I hope Turkey stays secular. It's amazing that it has stayed secular even until this day. But I am worried as it seems less people in the country want secularism.

Same can be said of the US.

The UK doesn't have a secular constitution, but it's entirely secular in practice because nobody gives a shit about religion.

Arbitrary documents written hundreds of years ago are irrelevant really, it's about the philosophical state of mind of the society.

And I wouldn't say the philosophical state of mind of the US or Turkey are very different at all right now when it comes to religion.
 
Sirolf said:
Yup sadly....
But i think the army will be a serious watchdog.
Religion and state must be separated..at all costs.

I hope you're not serious...by this logic Jews could not wear a kippah (the little...hat thing). Christians could not wear a cross necklace. They should be separate, but separating someone from their harmless religious practices is...bad.

Sirolf said:
In a perfect world yes..But when an islamics party takes the power ---> NO
Stop being naives people...This is the first step to put more religion into the state.

You're still kidding, right?

edit:

Branduil said:
Things I learned in this thread:

-free speech is bad.

-If people are allowed to wear religious symbols that means the government will become a theocracy in 5 years or less.

.
 
Masenkame said:
The U.S Constitution is entirely secular. One of the great achievements by the founding fathers.

I hope Turkey stays secular. It's amazing that it has stayed secular even until this day. But I am worried as it seems less people in the country want secularism.

Actually the majority of the people in Turkey are for secularism, but they are against the paranoid fear mongering way the country is run the last 80 or so years. "Allowing headscarves leads to Islamic state, Turkey will be doomed" or "Allowing more rights to Kurds will divide the country, Turkey will be doomed"! It's this way of thinking that's holding Turkey back to really progress towards a healthy humanrights situation. I am a Turk, my whole family (including me) is Muslim, hardly anyone wears a headscarve besides a few aunts and my grandmother. I think this new developement is a good thing.
 
Things I learned in this thread:

-free speech is bad.

-If people are allowed to wear religious symbols that means the government will become a theocracy in 5 years or less.
 
I wasn't serious. :lol (Those quoting me)

I fully support women having the option to wear scarves in universities.

I think some people here don't realize that the ultranationalists are generally the extremists in Turkey, they take their secularism to extremes. It's a stealth religion in a way.

An example being Veli Kucuk (former general) was planning on having Orhan Pamuk assasinated.

I know us that live in the USA generally associate the extremists with religious institutions, but in Turkey it generally leans the other way around.

RamzaIsCool said:
I am a Turk, my whole family (including me) is Muslim, hardly anyone wears a headscarve besides a few aunts and my grandmother. I think this new developement is a good thing.

Same here, the only people that wear hijab in my family are my mom, one of my aunts and my grandmother. No one else does, and no ones going to be forcing anyone to do so.
 
that is a strange position of secularists to take. I know they're trying to modernize the country, but banning people from wearing what they want isn't exactly a policy derived from liberalism
 
ElectricBlue187 said:
that is a strange position of secularists to take. I know they're trying to modernize the country, but banning people from wearing what they want isn't exactly a policy derived from liberalism

Secularism and Liberalism don't go hand in hand together. There are/were many Liberals who are religious. Turkey's secularism stems from a strongly nationalist position, carving out a Turkish homeland and not allowing pan-religious feeling or ethnic minorities to get in the way.
 
So.... Turkish women should be free to do whatever they wish. As long as they do what we want them to do?

Honestly forbidding the headscarf is as defensible as requiring it. As in not defensible at all. Why are you guys so terrified of a bit of cloth?
 
Azih said:
So.... Turkish women should be free to do whatever they wish. As long as they do what we want them to do?

Honestly forbidding the headscarf is as defensible as requiring it. As in not defensible at all. Why are you guys so terrified of a bit of cloth?

It's not like it was forbidden everywhere, only in schools and universities. Which is imo a good thing. I wouldn't mind banning all religious symbols from schools and universties.
 
Azih said:
So.... Turkish women should be free to do whatever they wish. As long as they do what we want them to do?

Honestly forbidding the headscarf is as defensible as requiring it. As in not defensible at all. Why are you guys so terrified of a bit of cloth?

Exactly...people should choose religion, not have it thrust upon them.

Xapati said:
It's not like it was forbidden everywhere, only in schools and universities. Which is imo a good thing. I wouldn't mind banning all religious symbols from schools and universties.

There's a difference between a school promoting a specific religion versus a student who has chosen their faith and wants to show it.
 
Xapati said:
It's not like it was forbidden everywhere, only in schools and universities. Which is imo a good thing.

That's as bad as saying

Itapax said:
It's not like it was required everywhere, only in schools and universities. Which is imo a good thing.

Institutions of learning should be inclusive guy.
 
Zapages said:
Yet the basis of some parts of the constitution are based upon the Bible...


Why are you lying?

ElectricBlue187 said:
that is a strange position of secularists to take. I know they're trying to modernize the country, but banning people from wearing what they want isn't exactly a policy derived from liberalism

Secular != liberal

Azih said:
Institutions of learning should be inclusive guy.

Ban all religious paraphernalia from the universities then. Save it for home or the magic building of your choice.
 
Count Dookkake said:
Ban all religious paraphernalia from the universities then. Save it for home or the magic building of your choice.
I've got no problems with atheists. As long as they keep it in their damn house.
 
Azih said:
I've got no problems with atheists. As long as they keep it in their damn house.

Keep what? :lol We don't wear funny hats or chant funny things. If you guys kept your toys and trinkets at home and not at school, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
 
Count Dookkake said:
Keep what? :lol We don't wear funny hats or chant funny things. If you guys kept your toys and trinkets at home and not at school, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

At least religious people don't whore their sisters.
 
Count Dookkake said:
Keep what? :lol We don't wear funny hats or chant funny things. If you guys kept your toys and trinkets at home and not at school, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

wow :\

Wow at this whole thread really.

This is a good decision..not something to cause an argument.
 
This place never ceases to amaze me with its combination of ridiculously oversimplified stereotypes and boundless naiveties.

Powerslave said:
At least religious people don't whore their sisters.

:lol
 
thesoapster said:
I hope you're not serious...by this logic Jews could not wear a kippah (the little...hat thing). Christians could not wear a cross necklace. They should be separate, but separating someone from their harmless religious practices is...bad.

You're still kidding, right?

edit:
.

I would ban the Jewish kippah but cross necklaces aren't inherently religious, so christians pretty much don't have anything attire-wise that is religious, unless you went to school dressed as a monk and I doubt anyone is dumb enough to do that.

I support the headscarf ban. Women shouldn't be forced to cover their faces even if they grow up being brainwashed to believe this is good for them. Banning headscarves is a very moderate and liberal way of improving Islam by allowing women to be a little bit more equal to men.

There is such a thing as moderate or secular Islam, it's very much like christianity in europe or america (where most people consider themselves christian, but aren't hardcore religious), and that is what should be promoted in today's society, not the sharia style fundamentalist Islam that oppresses women and homosexuals. I feel very sad for Turkey now because they are going one step backwards with this decision.
 
Pellham said:
but cross necklaces aren't inherently religious
wat?

I support the headscarf ban. Women shouldn't be forced to cover their faces
Who said anything about being forced? Who are you to force a woman not to cover her hair if she wants to?

There is such a thing as moderate or secular Islam
Then you don't know Islam very well.
 
It's perfectly apparent that a lot of white people think that Islam = terrorism.

This decision is identical to allowing white christian ladies to wear a crucifix on a necklace in College. I doubt half the panicking kids in this thread would object to that.
 
Azih said:
So.... Turkish women should be free to do whatever they wish. As long as they do what we want them to do?

Honestly forbidding the headscarf is as defensible as requiring it. As in not defensible at all. Why are you guys so terrified of a bit of cloth?

I was gonna say this exact thing, forcing a woman to not wear a headscarf is equally as bad as forcing them to wear a headscarf. Why should a woman be kept from pursuing higher education just because she wants to wear a cloth on her head?
 
GSG Flash said:
I was gonna say this exact thing, forcing a woman to not wear a headscarf is equally as bad as forcing them to wear a headscarf. Why should a woman be kept from pursuing higher education just because she wants to wear a cloth on her head?
Why would anybody in their right mind let a piece of cloth keep them from pursuing a higher education?
 
I can't support a headscarf ban in good conscience, but I'm also concerned at the direction Turkey's taking. Let's face it: in modern times, the more Islamic a country is, the generally crappier it ends up. Turkey's secularism may have come at the cost of some democracy, but other Muslim countries that didn't embrace secularism have even less democracy (and suffer on virtually every other scale as well).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom