MHWilliams
Member
Anime/Manga GAF incoming?
It is their culture and you need to respect that.
A grown adult drawing a child having sex in no way directly, or indirectly, harms actual children.
there is one store in Akihabara in particular (that used to be a games store) that is so off the charts dodgy i don't even know where to start.
Stocking dvd/br of 8 year olds sucking bananas is one thing - having meet and greets from the people in the dvd/br is a whoooooooooooooooole different level.
Normal people over here don't respect it
Anime/Manga GAF incoming?
I mean yeah, when you consider the Gravure idol kind of stuff with pre-teen/early teen children, I can understand and agree, it's more than a little creepy.
Stepping into the manga realm though..... now I'm on the fence here. A grown adult drawing a child having sex in no way directly, or indirectly, harms actual children.
This came up in a thread before, I think it was non-nude but sexually provocative photos of children that are legal while possession of child pornograghy was outlawed this year.
Either way, Japan is majorly fucked up when it comes to sexualizing kids.
We've got a live one!This would have no legal basis whatsoever. First, thought crime isn't something envisioned in modern legal systems. Pedophilia isn't accepted because childs can't consent and consequentially they can't have sex or anything (with exceptions of both minors and whatever). There is no consent dilemma in cartoons. Banning it would be more alike at banning omosexuality, where adults do things in full consent and it's still banned because it goes against "morality". The gateway argument make no sense either; it made no sense for drugs, it made no sense for games that promote killings, and it make no sense here.
Second, you have no ways to define a child in stylized drawings. What define a child? Being short? I just give it long ears and call it an halfling. Pubes? Plenty of adults shave. Small tits? Plenty of women have no tits. Even if such a ban went in effect, the only thing that would change is that everything would be considered done by adults cosplaying. Sorta like "this work is fiction" and whatever.
There's way more ground to ban actual children models. That has proven disastrously effects on a lot of children's psiche, and i don't think a parent giving consent is a strong enough rebuttal, since we ban most dangerous things from childrens no matter the opinion of the parent. There's a reason that kind of thing is not done anywhere else in the world but japan afaik.
there is one store in Akihabara in particular (that used to be a games store) that is so off the charts dodgy i don't even know where to start.
Stocking dvd/br of 8 year olds sucking bananas is one thing - having meet and greets from the people in the dvd/br is a whoooooooooooooooole different level.
Is this the end of third party Vita support?
We've got a live one!
Hopefully they ban all types.
I genuinely don't care about drawn children.
How about they get those real children out of the skimpy bikinis first?
Billboards featuring women with voluptuous figures and distinctly child-like faces are also widely seen in urban centers
We've got a live one!
You know, you could try to argue against him, you silly gooses.He probably prefers the usagi drop manga to the anime.
No you don't.It is their culture and you need to respect that.
How about they get those real children out of the skimpy bikinis first?
What does this even mean?
What does this even mean?
I don't think I need to argue. I think they are both part of the same problem.You know, you could try to argue against him, you silly gooses.
Gravure idols and sexulisation of real children are a problem that should be eradicated. But it gets more difficult in the realm of total fiction. Are you banning murder in fiction, too?
We've got a live one!
I don't think I need to argue. People don't read murder mysteries because they want to go out and kill someone.
For all of you who are in favour of banning cartoons and comics (a majority, it seems): to close all "loopholes", wouldn't it be safest to ban literary depictions of child abuse as well?
It is their culture and you need to respect that.
For all of you who are in favour of banning cartoons and comics (a majority, it seems): to close all "loopholes", wouldn't it be safest to ban literary depictions of child abuse as well?
What kind of effect does it have? I think pedophiles aren't created by the existence of lolicon content. Pretty sure there are plenty of pefophiles outside Japan and plenty of those who hate anime or don't even know it. It's really a similiar argument with rape fantasy porn, incest or murder in any media.I don't know, I'd rather pedophiles satisfy their urges with "extreme child manga porn" than actual cp - or even worse actual children.
But at the end of the day I can't argue against banning that stuff, even though who knows what kind of effect this is gonna have. I bet there's alot of people actually relying on this fictional stuff to satisfy their sexual fantasies. If it's banned and harder to obtain they might turn to real children instead...
The oppression of VitaGAF has reached such heights that I wouldn't even admit to owning one (which I don't) lest I be hazed off the forum.
Yes, but what does it mean?
There where a lot of things that where part of cultures that are now gone away, because they where crazy.It is their culture and you need to respect that.
pinocchiodead.gifIs this the end of third party Vita support?
What if someone draws one of these with drawn kids that look like your kids?
Oh, THEN you'll suddenly get why we need to consider drawn child porn along the same lines as actual child porn. It doesn't fucking matter if the picture was made with a camera, pen, or sculpture. It's child porn. Victims of rape still have to feel the damage of an act someone did to them, whether it was themselves videotaped or someone decided to draw them participating in the act. There is only negatives that come with allowing such sick shit to exist.
Is this the end of third party Vita support?
For all of you who are in favour of banning cartoons and comics (a majority, it seems): to close all "loopholes", wouldn't it be safest to ban literary depictions of child abuse as well?
What kind of effect does it have? I think pedophiles aren't created by the existence of lolicon content. Pretty sure there are plenty of pefophiles outside Japan and plenty of those who hate anime or don't even know it. It's really a similiar argument with rape fantasy porn, incest or murder in any media.
I don't know, I'd rather pedophiles satisfy their urges with "extreme child manga porn" than actual cp - or even worse actual children.
What if someone draws one of these with drawn kids that look like your kids?
Oh, THEN you'll suddenly get why we need to consider drawn child porn along the same lines as actual child porn. It doesn't fucking matter if the picture was made with a camera, pen, or sculpture. It's child porn. Victims of rape still have to feel the damage of an act someone did to them, whether it was themselves videotaped or someone decided to draw them participating in the act. There is only negatives that come with allowing such sick shit to exist.