FUCK, I just played Zelda and killed a few moblins and a a Yiga ninja.
Am I going to go to jail for murder? (circle one) Y/N
I think a better takeaway from this would be to
A) set age limits for interaction in these types of games/experiences (she shouldn't be anywhere near this as a minor for instance) and
B) have better in-game methods for blocking/reporting problematic players.
I don't want to go all slippery slope defending some shitheads that were being gross here, but there should be a VERY clear line between actual crimes and "virtual" ones.
The world has gone mad. Next we'll be hearing about how a bunch of cunts seeking therapy for the amount of virtual tea bagging they had to endure after being killed in Halo 2 all those years ago. This is just bananas.
Wait, how is "hate crime" not "tangible crime"? You then mention assault as tangible crime when an assault is obviously a common form of hate crime too. A crime is characterised hate crime by the perceived motive behind it, but it still has to be a crime first and foremost, so, cops should be on it...the infamous hate crime over tangible crime, such as assaults, drugs, theft, burglaries etc...
Help!! someone’s assaulting me online!!!
Nevemind it’s okay now..
Wait, how is "hate crime" not "tangible crime"? You then mention assault as tangible crime when an assault is obviously a common form of hate crime too. A crime is characterised hate crime by the perceived motive behind it, but it still has to be a crime first and foremost, so, cops should be on it...
What are you talking about, where does the post you quote mention anything else being equal to rape? It's not even about the thread's actual topic, just responding to a very particular, quoted, post, regarding hate crimes and what not so, no clue what part confused you so much.Hows that equals to rape? How is possible to do a sexual assault on an avatar?
What are you talking about, where does the post you quote mention anything being equal to rape? It's not even about the thread's actual topic, just responding to a very particular, quoted, post.
Seems most people above are fine with it as long as the person has the option to go offline since that all makes it fake, no kid has ever been traumatised, groomed or coerced to suicide or whatever else by things happening in any form other than personal interaction within the same room I guess.
How about P A R E N T I N G?I think a better takeaway from this would be to
A) set age limits for interaction in these types of games/experiences (she shouldn't be anywhere near this as a minor for instance) and
B) have better in-game methods for blocking/reporting problematic players.
I don't want to go all slippery slope defending some shitheads that were being gross here, but there should be a VERY clear line between actual crimes and "virtual" ones.
Well just read the article, the implications are pretty easy to understand, not very subtle.Thread title doesn't equalize it to rape either anyway, it just says police investigate it, not what charges were pressed against the perps. And yes, adults inappropriately interacting with children should be investigated even long before it reaches the point of physically touching their genitals. Duh.
The impact of the attack on the girl's avatar was said to be heightened because of the immersive nature of the VR experience.
According to an unnamed senior officer familiar with the matter who spoke to the paper the victim, under 16 at the time, suffered psychological trauma "similar to that of someone who has been physically raped".
But in criminal law, rape and sexual assault require there to have been physical contact.
Some argue that legal changes may be necessary to ensure that those responsible for sexually motivated attacks on avatars in virtual worlds can be prosecuted and punished effectively.
I guess I should be on sex offenders list for all those times I would do thrust motions behind people in Phantasy Star Online lobbies on Dreamcast cuz I thought it was funny...
I completely agree at its core there are issues with the parenting, but I also remember being 15 and doing all kinds of shit my parents would hate and absolutely not want me to do. Plus you can't count on good parenting at all in 2024. These kids have been having tablets and phones shoved at them to shut them up for the last 10 years at least, since they got affordable to the masses.How about P A R E N T I N G?
Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-67865327
likening it to sexual assault.
Recalling the experience, Ms Patel told the same programme that she was "surrounded by three to four male-sounding and male-representing avatars, who started sexually harassing me in a verbal sense and then sexually assaulting my avatar".
She said they had used misogynistic language and "continued to touch my avatar in a way that can only be described as a sexual assault of my avatar".
Virtual crime shares a lot of similarities with thought crimes. I think UK already has had some cases hit the news of using words being illegal, so if I lived in the UK I'd be very worried about the precedent with this.For my non UK gaffers. The above, particularly the bolded, is a crime here. Intent will also play a huge part of the litigation.
I know people are keen to make light of the situation but that doesn't make it less of a potential crime in the UK.
Virtual crime shares a lot of similarities with thought crimes. I think UK already has had some cases hit the news of using words being illegal, so if I lived in the UK I'd be very worried about the precedent with this.
I don't think many people will stand up for the shitheads doing the harassing, but getting the law involved in a formal matter is a "cat out of the bag" scenario. Imagine you go on a flame rant on a message board one night when you're drunk and wake up with police at the door.
Yet...Also, flame rants are not against the law, here.
Yet...
Yorkshire Pudding and Soccer sucks!The UK government literally allocates specific time for flame rants between the two major parties. It's called "Prime Minister's questions." Where the party in power and the leader of the opposition politely insult each other under the guise of political debate. Which is broadcast live on national tv...
I think your flame rants on gaf are safe lol
you just committed self-dead.Help!! someone’s assaulting me online!!!
Nevemind it’s okay now..