• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

US Navy 4 years away from ship-mounted laser cannon prototypes

Status
Not open for further replies.

XiaNaphryz

LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/03/navy-lasers-four-years/

The dream of sailors, nerds and sailor-nerds everywhere is on the verge of coming true, senior Navy technologists swear. Within four years, they claim they’ll have a working prototype of a laser cannon, ready to place aboard a ship. And they’re just months away from inviting defense contractors to bid on a contract to build it for them.

“Subsonic cruise missiles, aircraft, fast-moving boats, unmanned aerial vehicles” — Mike Deitchman, who oversees future weapons development for the Office of Naval Research, promises Danger Room that the Navy laser cannons just over the horizon will target them all.

Or they will be, if ONR’s plans work out as promised — not exactly a strong suit of proposed laser weapons over the decades. (Note the decided lack of blast at your side.) First step in reaching this raygun reality: Finish up the paperwork. “The contract will probably have options go through four years, but depending on which laser source the vendors pick, we may be able to demo something after two years,” says Roger McGiness, who works on laser tech for Deitchman. “Our hope afterwards is to move to acquisition.”

If this sounds like a rapid pace of development for the ultimate in science fiction weaponry, there are two major explanations why the Navy thinks the future makes a pew-pew-pew noise. The first is technological. The second is bureaucratic.

From a technological perspective, the Navy thinks maritime laser weapons finally represent a proven, mature technology. The key point came last April, when the Navy put a test laser firing a (relatively weak) 15-kilowatt beam aboard a decommissioned destroyer. Never before had a laser cannon at sea disabled an enemy vessel. But the Martime Laser Demonstrator cut through choppy California waters, an overcast sky and salty sea air to burn through the outboard engine of a moving motorboat a mile away. You can see video of the successful demonstration above.

The bureaucratic reason has to do with a decision inside the Office of Naval Research to focus its laser efforts with laser-like precision. For over a decade, it’s dreamed of creating a massive, scalable laser weapon, called the Free Electron Laser, that can generate up to a megawatt’s worth of blast power. Currently, the laser blasts 14 kilowatts of light — think 140 lamps, all shining in the same direction and at the same wavelength. A hundred kilowatts is considered militarily useful; a megawatt beam would burn through 20 feet of steel in a single second.

The Free Electron Laser has its critics, including a Senate committee. And it was sucking up all the oxygen inside the Navy’s laser efforts. So, as InsideDefense.com first reported, ONR decided, effectively, to break them up into the laser equivalent of weight classes. Generating a 100-kilowatt beam is now the province of “solid state lasers,” lasers that focus light through a solid gain medium, like a crystal or a optical fibers. The Free Electron Laser, which uses magnets to generate its beam, will stay focused on getting up to a megawatt.

That, the Navy’s scientists contend, will get an actual, working laser cannon onto a ship faster. Yes, a 100-kilowatt laser isn’t as powerful as the longed-for megawatt gun. And yes, a solid-state laser can’t operate on multiple wavelengths, while a Free Electron Laser can, making the mega-laser more useful when the sea air is full of crud and pollution. But the Office of Naval Research says that lots of active, near-term threats to ships will be vulnerable to the 100-kilowatt, solid state laser.

“It’s easier to shrink down a solid-state laser [to get on a ship], and there’s a maturity here, vice the Free Electron Laser,” says Deitchman. “The solid-state laser will still deal with many asymmetric threats, but not the most hardened, most challenging threats. It’s near-to-mid term. The Free Electron Laser is still long-term.”

There’s another advantage to developing a less-powerful laser first. The Navy’s surface ships don’t yet have the power generation necessary for spooling up a megawatt-class laser — or at least not if they don’t want to potentially be dead in the water.
That’s one of the reasons the Senate Armed Services Committee is skeptical of the Free Electron Laser. It’s not clear that the ships can cope with diverting 100 kilowatts of power, either, but the Office of Naval Research thinks they can, and the laser geeks are “working closely” with the Naval Sea Systems Command to make sure the scientists are writing checks that the ship’s generators can cash.
Slowly but surely, we're getting there!

48Kbr.jpg
 
The conflict between my inner peacenik and my inner 5-year-old are currently locked in brutal combat regarding how I feel about this.
 

Grinchy

Banned
Hopefully these are covered under the 2nd Amendment. What if a robber is wearing 20 ft of steel?
 

Poody

What program do you use to photoshop a picture?
So the Navy has gone public with lasers and rail guns in the next decade. What else don't we know about?
 

Jenov

Member
So the Navy has gone public with lasers and rail guns in the next decade. What else don't we know about?

Yeah, I'm wondering what weapons they are secretly working on if freakin lasers are now being publicly tested. The mind boggles.
 

Tajin

Banned
I'm pretty sure the Navy's experimental weaponry budget alone could provide healthcare to a majority of Americans.

That being said, awesome.

Whatever happened to their railgun though? That thing could launch bolts so far and so fast, that they would arc around the curvature of the earth.
 

wenis

Registered for GAF on September 11, 2001.
ibrkpEpIQmfLBS.jpg


Jess Perkins: 10,000 acres of wooded residential land were scorched in an instant when a laser cannon misfired during routine start-up tests.

Casey Wong: Yes, it was a day of mourning for the families of one hundred and thirteen known dead at this hour... Among them, two former United States Presidents. A day of mourning for a country.


slightly altered for context
 

Toppot

Member
I'm waiting for pew pew laser weapons in a handgun.

Mirrors are not perfect so they always absorb a fraction of the light. A fraction of a crap load of energy is still a crap load of energy, enough to melt the mirror.
Bad science ideas:

A stack of mirrors

A prism to reflect/bend the laser away

A magnifying glass the other way round to spread the laser, making it less effective.
 

Ether_Snake

安安安安安安安安安安安安安安安
Only good against third world countries, like all war weapons.
 

Atrus

Gold Member
So the Navy has gone public with lasers and rail guns in the next decade. What else don't we know about?

Well the next generation of bombers are pegged to be sub-orbital and orbital bombers while the next generation of fighters are likely going to be unmanned drones.

Unmanned land drones and vehicles, smarter ammunition, reactive body armor and powered armor would be the next good guess.
 
I"m all for cutting money out of the defense budget. But not for R&D. In any way.

It could be used for mining! Or other stuff we can't even imagine yet. All you guys are negative nancys.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom