XiaNaphryz
LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/03/navy-lasers-four-years/
The dream of sailors, nerds and sailor-nerds everywhere is on the verge of coming true, senior Navy technologists swear. Within four years, they claim theyll have a working prototype of a laser cannon, ready to place aboard a ship. And theyre just months away from inviting defense contractors to bid on a contract to build it for them.
Subsonic cruise missiles, aircraft, fast-moving boats, unmanned aerial vehicles Mike Deitchman, who oversees future weapons development for the Office of Naval Research, promises Danger Room that the Navy laser cannons just over the horizon will target them all.
Or they will be, if ONRs plans work out as promised not exactly a strong suit of proposed laser weapons over the decades. (Note the decided lack of blast at your side.) First step in reaching this raygun reality: Finish up the paperwork. The contract will probably have options go through four years, but depending on which laser source the vendors pick, we may be able to demo something after two years, says Roger McGiness, who works on laser tech for Deitchman. Our hope afterwards is to move to acquisition.
If this sounds like a rapid pace of development for the ultimate in science fiction weaponry, there are two major explanations why the Navy thinks the future makes a pew-pew-pew noise. The first is technological. The second is bureaucratic.
From a technological perspective, the Navy thinks maritime laser weapons finally represent a proven, mature technology. The key point came last April, when the Navy put a test laser firing a (relatively weak) 15-kilowatt beam aboard a decommissioned destroyer. Never before had a laser cannon at sea disabled an enemy vessel. But the Martime Laser Demonstrator cut through choppy California waters, an overcast sky and salty sea air to burn through the outboard engine of a moving motorboat a mile away. You can see video of the successful demonstration above.
The bureaucratic reason has to do with a decision inside the Office of Naval Research to focus its laser efforts with laser-like precision. For over a decade, its dreamed of creating a massive, scalable laser weapon, called the Free Electron Laser, that can generate up to a megawatts worth of blast power. Currently, the laser blasts 14 kilowatts of light think 140 lamps, all shining in the same direction and at the same wavelength. A hundred kilowatts is considered militarily useful; a megawatt beam would burn through 20 feet of steel in a single second.
Slowly but surely, we're getting there!The Free Electron Laser has its critics, including a Senate committee. And it was sucking up all the oxygen inside the Navys laser efforts. So, as InsideDefense.com first reported, ONR decided, effectively, to break them up into the laser equivalent of weight classes. Generating a 100-kilowatt beam is now the province of solid state lasers, lasers that focus light through a solid gain medium, like a crystal or a optical fibers. The Free Electron Laser, which uses magnets to generate its beam, will stay focused on getting up to a megawatt.
That, the Navys scientists contend, will get an actual, working laser cannon onto a ship faster. Yes, a 100-kilowatt laser isnt as powerful as the longed-for megawatt gun. And yes, a solid-state laser cant operate on multiple wavelengths, while a Free Electron Laser can, making the mega-laser more useful when the sea air is full of crud and pollution. But the Office of Naval Research says that lots of active, near-term threats to ships will be vulnerable to the 100-kilowatt, solid state laser.
Its easier to shrink down a solid-state laser [to get on a ship], and theres a maturity here, vice the Free Electron Laser, says Deitchman. The solid-state laser will still deal with many asymmetric threats, but not the most hardened, most challenging threats. Its near-to-mid term. The Free Electron Laser is still long-term.
Theres another advantage to developing a less-powerful laser first. The Navys surface ships dont yet have the power generation necessary for spooling up a megawatt-class laser or at least not if they dont want to potentially be dead in the water. Thats one of the reasons the Senate Armed Services Committee is skeptical of the Free Electron Laser. Its not clear that the ships can cope with diverting 100 kilowatts of power, either, but the Office of Naval Research thinks they can, and the laser geeks are working closely with the Naval Sea Systems Command to make sure the scientists are writing checks that the ships generators can cash.